Skip to content

RCT Comparing EMDR and CBT for Treatment of Resistant Depression

Multicenter RCT Comparing EMDR and CBT Efficacy for Treatmen of Resistant Depression

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03972033
Enrollment
128
Registered
2019-06-03
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Depression, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Heart Rate Variability, High Definition Electroencefalography, Neurobiological Processing

Keywords

depression, neurobiology of emotions, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, trauma, psychotherapy

Brief summary

Depression is one of the most common invalidating mental disorders, ranked by World Health Organization as the single largest contributor to global disability. Current recommended treatments for depression include antidepressant medication and according to guidelines, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Interpersonal Therapy (IPT). Despite encouraging preliminary results (e.g., Matthijssen et al., 2020), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is not yet recognized as an effective therapy for depression by APA and NICE. The project aims to conduct a large multisite study that addresses the shortcomings of previous efficacy research on EMDR for depression. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of EMDR therapy in reducing depressive symptoms in adults with major depression as compared to CBT. Secondary aims of the study are the effectiveness of EMDR, as compared to CBT and TAU, in improving anxiety, and other symptoms. It is hypothesized that EMDR is not inferior to CBT.

Detailed description

The study is a multicenter clinical randomized controlled trial, conducted in Italy, USA and UK that will assess the effectiveness of EMDR therapy compared to CBT and TAU. Patients will be recruited at four clinical centers: Turin and Rome in Italy, and Kansas City in USA. The study protocol was approved by the local research ethics committee in each of the countries where the intervention is implemented.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEMDR

Treatments will be independent and blinded to the clinical psychologists conducting the clinical assessments. EMDR and CBT treatments will be provided for 16 weeks, each comprising 16 weekly individual sessions. Interventions will be conducted according to published treatment manuals. All treatment sessions will be video recorded for fidelity rating and supervision. As a safety criterion, if severe worsening of symptoms is observed, patients are withdrawn from their assigned treatment arm.

BEHAVIORALCBT

Treatments will be independent and blinded to the clinical psychologists conducting the clinical assessments. EMDR and CBT treatments will be provided for 16 weeks, each comprising 16 weekly individual sessions. Interventions will be conducted according to published treatment manuals. All treatment sessions will be video recorded for fidelity rating and supervision. As a safety criterion, if severe worsening of symptoms is observed, patients are withdrawn from their assigned treatment arm.

Sponsors

EMDR Europe
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcomes assessors doesn't know the patient group assignment.

Intervention model description

The design of the study is a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, single episode or recurrent, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5); 2. a score of at least 20 on Beck's Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II); 3. having received ADM treatment with a stable dose for at least six weeks and maintained stable during treatment; 4. legal capacity to consent to the treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. diagnosis of current PTSD (assessed with MINI-Plus and the International Trauma Questionnaire - ITQ, Cloitre et al., 2018); 2. diagnosis of complex PTSD (assessed with the ITQ); 3. history of psychotic symptoms or schizophrenia; 4. bipolar disorder or dementia; 5. cluster A and B severe personality disorders; 6. dissociative symptoms (DES-B score \>2); 7. any substance-related abuse or dependence disorder (except those involving nicotine) in the 6 months prior to the study; 8. a serious, unstable medical condition; 9. a severely unstable social and economic condition (e.g. no fixed abode; job loss without any other source of income); 10. being pregnant; 11. acute suicidality that needs hospitalization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in depressive symptomsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup).Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)
changes in depressive symptomsweek 0, week 16, week 40Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
changes in cognitive component of depressive syndromemonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)
changes in HD-EEGmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)HD-EEG in resting state phase and a second phase with a task
changes in fMRImonth 0 (T0)fMRI in resting state phase and a second phase with a task
changes in HRVmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)HRV detection during hdEEG assessment
psychiatric diagnosismonth 0 (T0)Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5)
changing in depressive symptomsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup) and every weekPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changing in physical activity habitsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF)
changing in post-traumatic symptomsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)International Trauma Questionnaire
changing in suicidal thinkingmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Paykel Suicide Scale
addressing potentially traumatizing eventsmonth 0 (T0)Traumatic Experience Checklist (TEC)
changing in post-traumatic stress symptomsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
assessing disability and functional impairment as a result of treatment1 month time frameSheehan Disability Scale for Treatment Induced Impairment (SDS-T)
changing in anxiety symptomsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup) and every weekGeneral Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
changing in stressmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
assessing childhood traumamonth 0 (T0)Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)
evaluating the quality of relationshipsmonth 0 (T0)Relationship Questionnaire (RQ)
changing in dissociative symptomsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Brief Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-B)
changing in autonomic symptomsmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)
changing in the emotional regulationmonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
changing in the dimensions of the emotional stylemonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Emotional Style Questionnaire (ESQ)
changing in quality of sleep, in particular insomniamonth 0 (T0, baseline), month 4 (T1, post-treatment), month 10 (T2, followup), month 22 (T3, followup)Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactLuca Ostacoli, Associate Professor
luca.ostacoli@unito.it3335613155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026