Skip to content

Investigation of the Efficacy of a VR Exposure-based Eye Contact Training‬ to Reduce Fear of Public Speaking

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of a VR Exposure-based Eye Contact Training‬ to Reduce Fear of Public Speaking

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03970187
Acronym
ASSIST-2019
Enrollment
96
Registered
2019-05-31
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2019-09-20
Last updated
2019-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fear of Public Speaking (Subclinical)

Brief summary

Investigation of the efficacy of an eye contact training App in virtual reality, based on principles of exposure therapy for the treatment for subjects with fear of public speaking.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted as a randomized controlled single-blind study in a parallel groups design. Participants will be divided into groups afraid of public speaking with and without fulfilling the criteria of social anxiety (according to DSM-V), which can represent a clinically relevant and more generalized form of public speaking anxiety. The treatment for the participants solely differs in terms of whether they receive (1) the VR exposure or (2) a fear-unrelated VR task (study phase 1) or no treatment at all (study phase 2), resulting in the following 2 groups: * Group 1 (treatment group) consists of individuals with fear of public speaking that will (in study phase 1) receive a three-session VR exposure and undergo (in study phase 2) a 2-week treatment period with the same VR scenarios, each repeated three times. * Group 2 (control group) consists of individuals with fear of public speaking that will not receive any active treatment but complete a distractor task in VR in study phase 1 and no treatment in study phase 2. In study phase 1, the treatment group receives three VR exposure sessions each lasting for 20 minutes, whereas the control group completes three virtual distractor tasks (e.g. virtual tours) of identical duration. In study phase 2, the treatment group completes a home training spanning two weeks (9 x 20-minutes sessions), whereas the control group does not receive any treatment (untreated comparison group). In study phase 1, before and after the virtual exposure session, participants undergo an in vivo PST to assess the acute effects of the VR exposure-based eye contact training App. In study phase 2, the participants undergo a third in vivo PST to assess the training effects of the VR exposure-based eye contact training after two weeks of home training. This design allows a direct isolation and comparison of acute effects (study phase 1) and of training effects (study phase 2) and therefore enables an overall estimation of the effectiveness of the VR exposure-based eye contact training. Approximately 96 participants between 18 and 40 years with fear of public speaking will take part in the study. Approximately 1 to 5 weeks after having finished the first study phase, all participants that have not dropped out will take part in the second study phase.

Interventions

OTHERExposure-based eye contact training in Virtual Reality (VR)

The intervention is an App for virtual reality. The VR App provides three different virtual scenarios. Participants will be asked to stand in front of a virtual audience and to maintain eye contact with audience members. The advance to higher difficulty levels is according to a pre-defined exposure scheme. Participants will be given all instructions via the App. There will be three sessions on one day (duration of 20 min each) in study phase 1. The indication is disproportionate fear of being evaluated by others and reduced eye contact as a typical avoidance strategy in individuals with fear of public speaking. In the study phase 2, there will be nine sessions spanning over two weeks (duration of 20 min each, with maximally one session per day). The indication is disproportionate fear of being evaluated by others and reduced eye contact as a typical avoidance strategy in individuals with fear of public speaking.

Sponsors

Prof. Dominique de Quervain, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Investigators evaluating the (external) performance in the in vivo Public Speech Test (PST) will be blinded (unaware of group assignment of participants, single-blind).

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled single-blind study design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fear of public speaking, assessed by two separate aspects: * High fear in social situations including the potential of being evaluated by others * Social situations can only be withstood under high fear or are avoided * Aged between 18-40 * Fluent in German

Exclusion criteria

* BDI-II sumscore \>= 20 * Suicidal ideation (BDI-II item 9 \> 0) * Serious medical or psychological condition, other than social anxiety (including Depression, Epilepsy and Migraine) * Concurrent psychotherapy * Previous exposure-based therapy for social anxiety (including public speaking anxiety) or other anxiety disorders * Parallel participation in another psychological or medical study * Chronic medication intake (except oral contraceptives) * Chronic drug intake (i.e. LSD, mushrooms, Ecstasy, MDMA, amphetamines etc.) * Medication intake before visits (less than 24 h) * Alcohol intake before visits (less than 12 h) * Cannabis or other psychoactive substances (including benzodiazepines) intake before visits (less than 5 days) * Restricted 3D sight * For women: Current pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS, fear)Assessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksFear of public speaking is quantified by means of SUDS-ratings during a Public Speaking Test (PST) in vivo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global subjectively perceived improvement of fear, eye contact and performance after single VR-exposure/waitlistAssessed at visit 1 after completing the second PSTGlobal subjectively perceived improvement of fear, eye contact and performance by the VR eye contact training App will be done by VAS-ratings
Questionnaire for fear of negative evaluation (The Furcht vor negativer Evaluation - Kurzskala; FNE-K)Assessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksThe FNE-K is a frequently used, valid, and reliable self-report questionnaire consisting of 12 items measuring fear and distress related to negative evaluation by others (e.g. I am afraid that people will find fault with me) on 4-point Likert scales. The FNE-K has demonstrated good reliability and validity (Reichenberger et al., 2016).
Eye-tracking measuresAssessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksGaze behaviour (fixation frequency and location, scan path characteristics) and pupil size
Physiological measuresAssessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksSalivary cortisol levels
Global external assessment of performance in an in vivo public speech testAssessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksThe global external assessment of performance is done by averaging VAS-ratings (range from 0 = very bad performance to 100 = very good performance) of the PST from three independent members of a committee (experimenters) and a forth experimenter that will rate the performances using a video and audio recording from the speeches.
Total time of eye contact during an in vivo public speech testAssessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksTotal time of eye contact is measured by a mobile eye tracking device from Pupil Labs and operationalized by the number of frames the gaze is in predefined regions of interest comprising the eyes of the committee members.
Fear of eye contact (SUDS, eye contact)Assessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksFear of public speaking is quantified by means of SUDS-ratings during a Public Speaking Test (PST) in vivo.
Global self-assessment of performance in an in vivo public speech testAssessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksThe global self-assessment of performance is done by a VAS-ratings (range from 0 = very bad performance to 100 = very good performance) of the PST
Global subjectively perceived improvement of fear, eye contact and performance after VR-training/waitlistAssessed at visit 2 after completing the PSTGlobal subjectively perceived improvement of fear, eye contact and performance by the VR eye contact training App will be done by VAS-ratings
Questionnaire for social anxiety (Soziale-Phobie-Inventar; SPIN)Assessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksThe SPIN is a 17-item questionnaire developed by the Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Department at Duke University. It is effective in screening for, and measuring the severity of fear related to the negative evaluation by others. The 17 items cover different aspects of the anxiety such as fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms on 5-point Likert scales. The statements of the SPIN items indicate the particular signs of public speaking anxiety (e.g. I am bothered by blushing in front of people). The SPIN demonstrates solid psychometric properties and is valid as a measurement for the severity and clinical relevance of fear related symptoms (Connor et al., 2000).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Simulation sickness in VRAssessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksSafety outcome, assessed by the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ)
Feature-specific external and self-assessment of performance in an in vivo public speech test (VAS-ratings)Assessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksFeature-specific assessment of the participants performance in the in vivo PST is measured by VAS-ratings (from 0 = very bad to 100 = very good) from three independent members of a committee. A forth experimenter will rate the performances using a video and audio recording from the speeches. 8 specific VAS-ratings covering nonverbal aspects of performances (e.g. facial expression, gestures etc.) are divided into two subscales with 4 VAS-ratings each (1 = speech, 2 = appearance).
Vocal indices of stressAssessing change between baseline and predefined follow-up time points during 11 weeksVocal indices of stress comprise f.e. level and variability of the fundamental frequency or the active speech duration. They will be measured by analysing the audio recordings during the PST.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026