Skip to content

Vascular Access Outcome Measure for Function: a vaLidation Study In haemoDialysis

Vascular Access Outcome Measure for Function: a vaLidation Study In haemoDialysis (VALID)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03969225
Acronym
VALID
Enrollment
702
Registered
2019-05-31
Start date
2019-12-06
Completion date
2023-02-17
Last updated
2024-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemodialysis Access Failure (Disorder), Vascular Access Complication

Keywords

Haemodialysis vascular access, Core outcome, Vascular access function, Validation, Haemodialysis, Hemodialysis, Vascular access intervention, Vascular access procedure, Standardised outcomes in nephrology (SONG)

Brief summary

A functioning vascular access provides a lifeline for patients requiring haemodialysis but vascular access dysfunction remains one of the leading causes of excessive morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs in this group. Despite increasing numbers of vascular access trials, successful interventions to improve vascular access function have been sparse and compromised by highly variable, often selectively reported outcome measures of limited relevance to patients and health professionals. Through engagement of all relevant stakeholders including patients and caregivers, vascular access function, defined by the need for interventions to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis, has been identified as one of the most critically important outcome measures for trials in haemodialysis. This prospective, multi-centre, multinational validation study aims to assess the accuracy and feasibility of measuring vascular access function part of routine clinical practice and across different clinical settings to ensure successful global implementation of this core outcome measure in future trials in haemodialysis.

Detailed description

Haemodialysis is the most common treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease worldwide and can only be provided via a functional vascular access. Patients, caregivers and health professionals consider vascular access function one of the most critically important outcomes in haemodialysis but trial-based evidence to improve vascular access function is limited by the inconsistent and selective reporting of this outcome. Reporting of a standardised outcome measure for vascular access function across all trials in haemodialysis will enhance the consistency and relevance of trial evidence to guide patient-centred care. Based on international contribution of all relevant stakeholders including patients, the need of interventions to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis was considered a simple, pragmatic, and meaningful measure of vascular access function. To ensure global implementation across all trial in haemodialysis, it needs to be feasible to accurately collect this outcome measure as part of routine clinical practice without requiring additional resources or expertise in vascular access. VALID is a prospective, multi-centre, multinational validation study to assess the accuracy and feasibility of measuring vascular access function, defined by the need for interventions to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis by clinical staff as part of their routing clinical practice and across different clinical settings. The primary objective of the VALID study is to determine whether vascular access function can be measured accurately by clinical staff as part of routine clinical practice compared to the reference standard of a research team with expertise in vascular access during a 6-month follow-up period. An estimated 612 participants will be recruited from approximately 10 dialysis units of difference size, type (home-, in-centre and satellite), governance (private versus public), and location (rural versus urban) across Australia, Canada, China, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Malaysia and the United States of America (USA). Implementation of a validated outcome measure for vascular access function across clinical trials will improve the reliability, comparability and relevance of future research in haemodialysis to inform patient-centred care.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Australasian Kidney Trials Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
The University of Queensland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients new to or established on chronic haemodialysis (i.e. incident and prevalent patients on chronic haemodialysis) * Patients 18 years or more of age * Able to provide informed consent (if consent is required).

Exclusion criteria

* Anticipated to require haemodialysis for less than 90 days * Treating team considers patient unsuitable to be enrolled * Patient or authorised representative not willing to consent (if consent is required).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reporting of vascular access function, defined by the need for any intervention(s) required to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis. Vascular access interventions to be collected are outlined in the description below.6 monthsArteriovenous fistula (AVF)/Arteriovenous graft (AVG) * Open surgical or endovascular creation/placement of AVF/AVG * Open surgical revision or endovascular intervention of AVG/AVF * Thrombolysis or thrombectomy of AVG/AVF * Ligation or resection of arteriovenous access * Repair of aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm * Competing/collateral vein ligation * Fistulogram (Angiogram) +/- angioplasty +/- stenting (including inflow artery, body of AVF/AVG, venous outflow, central vein) * Competing/collateral vein embolisation * Superficialisation/transposition * Management of Dialysis Associated Steal Syndrome (DASS)/Access Induced Ischaemia. Procedures include: * Distal Revascularisation, Interval Ligation (DRIL) * Proximalisation of the Arterial Inflow (PAI) * Revision Using Distal Inflow (RUDI) * Banding Central venous catheter (CVC) * CVC insertion * CVC exchange * Fibrin sheath removal/disruption * CVC removal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of vascular access interventions to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis (number/patient-year).6 monthsInterventions collected as listed in the Primary Outcome description
Time to first vascular access intervention to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis (days).6 monthsInterventions collected as listed in the Primary Outcome description
Type of vascular access interventions.6 monthsInterventions collected as listed in the Primary Outcome description

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment rate (number of participants/year)6 monthsFeasibility outcome measures
Time required for measuring vascular access function (minutes)6 monthsFeasibility outcome measures
Enrolment ratio (number of patients enrolled/number of patients screened)6 monthsFeasibility outcome measures
Eligibility ratio (number of patients eligible/number of patients screened)6 monthsFeasibility outcome measures
Completeness of data collection (percentage)6 monthsFeasibility outcome measures
Likert score of feasibility questionnaire with data collectors (scale of 1 to 5, 1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree)6 monthsFeasibility outcome measures
Qualitative analysis of semi structured interview with data collector6 monthsFeasibility outcome measures

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Malaysia, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026