Skip to content

A Comparison of the Outcomes of Distal Fingertip Amputations Treated With Either Artificial (Xeroform) or Biological Dressings

A Comparison of the Outcomes of Distal Fingertip Amputations Treated With Either Artificial (Xeroform) or Biological Dressings

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03968835
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-05-30
Start date
2018-12-24
Completion date
2021-05-31
Last updated
2020-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation, Traumatic, Finger Injuries

Brief summary

This is a prospective study looking to evaluate whether the treatment outcomes for patients who sustain a distal fingertip amputation are improved or no different when using biological dressings versus artificial dressings.

Interventions

For the first 30 people, bacitracin will be applied and covered with xeroform and gauze.

OTHERSkin Graft

For the next 30 patients, the amputated composite skin and soft tissue unit will be thinned out to become a full thickness skin graft.

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All individuals presenting at Bellevue Hospital for evaluation and treatment of a finger amputation distal to the germinal matrix that present along with the amputated distal fingertip unit.

Exclusion criteria

* replantation candidate, incomplete distal finger-tip amputation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to complete healing up to 3 Months3 months
Percentage of graft viability (for biological dressing only)1 week

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026