Indication of Ceaseran Section in Primigravida According to Robson's Classification

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03967028

Enrollment

100

Registered

2019-05-30

Start date

2019-11-05

Completion date

2021-12-31

Last updated

2022-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CESAREAN SECTION

Brief summary

Rate of caesarean section surgery are rising worldwide,but the determinant of this increase,especially in low-income and middle-income countries, are controversial.In 1985,The world Health organization (WHO) stated;(There is no justification for any region to have a ceasearan section rate higher than 10-15%). Despite the lack of scientific evidence indicating any substantial maternal and perinatal benefits from increasing cs rates,and some studies showing that higher rates could be linked to negative consequences in maternal and child health, CS continue to increase world wide

Interventions

PROCEDUREcesarean section

lower segment cesarean section either elective or emergency

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Nullipara * Single fetus . * More than 37 weeks . * Patients who pass into spontaneous * Patient who induced labour

Exclusion criteria

* Non cephalic presentation. * Abnormal lie

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
The prevalence of etiologies of cesarean section	one month	determine the rate of cesarean section with different indication according to Robson classification

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026