Skip to content

Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED)

Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED): R21 Pilot Phase

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03966989
Acronym
IQED
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-05-29
Start date
2021-12-31
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2021-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergency Department

Keywords

Emergency Medicine, Behavioral Research

Brief summary

Recent work in emergency medicine has shown errors were more likely to occur at the end of shifts, as pressure exists to make a number of decisions simultaneously, and after what may be an already long series of cognitive challenges. Decision fatigue may also contribute to disparities by surfacing subconscious bias. The objective of the R21 pilot phase of Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED) is to identify addressable gaps in quality and equity and use performance feedback as an intervention to improve performance on chest pain, CT imaging, and antibiotic prescribing. Performance feedback intervention will include feedback offline via email or text.

Detailed description

The objective of the R21 pilot phase of Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED) is to identify addressable gaps in quality and equity and use performance feedback as an intervention to improve performance on chest pain, CT imaging, and antibiotic prescribing. Performance feedback intervention will include feedback offline via email or text. Each clinician will be randomized at the provider or clinic level to either the intervention or control group. Once clinicians are randomized, the aforementioned intervention will be turned on for a 3-6 month time period. For providers in the intervention group, the goal is to evaluate the effect of social norms on overuse and underuse behavior related to prescriptions or testing. Near real-time social norms will be delivered to providers which benchmark their own performance on various metrics to that of their peers. The investigators performance feedback reports for each provider randomized to receive the audit and feedback intervention will have three key characteristics: (1) each target provider will receive his or her individual performance, (2) benchmarks will prominently feature the performance of providers who would be considered credible peers of the target provider, and (3) benchmarks will reflect only performance that is desirable (e.g., showing only the performance of the best-performing credible peers). Providers randomized to the control group will follow standard practice.

Interventions

Performance feedback offline that benchmarks providers' own performance to that of their peers

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER
Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
LAC+USC Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Davis
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Attendings and residents that see patients in the Emergency Department.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: Chest Pain6 monthsMeasurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to chest pain (proportion of cases in which HEART score algorithm was used for chest pain patients)
Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: CT imaging6 monthsMeasurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to CT imaging (proportion of orders for unnecessary CT scans)
Efficacy of behavioral nudges to improve quality and safety in Emergency Medicine through measurement of adherence to guidelines: Antibiotic prescribing6 monthsMeasurement of clinician adherence to guidelines for quality measures related to antibiotic prescribing (proportion of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory infections)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026