Skip to content

Comparison Between Conventional Monitoring Versus Monitoring Via Vitaphone in the Detection of Post Ablation Atrial Arrhythmias of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Comparison Between Conventional Monitoring Versus Monitoring Via Vitaphone in the Detection of Post Ablation Atrial Arrhythmias of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03966976
Acronym
VITAPHONE
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-05-29
Start date
2018-03-15
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2019-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common atrial arrhythmia. Ablation of AF is a recent technique, nevertheless, the success rates of ablation vary between 50% and 70% depending on the paroxysmal or persistent nature of AF. These rates are difficult to assess in routine practice because they are based on the recurrence of fibrillation. The Vitaphone is a non-invasive device, with which the patient can record a single-track ECG as his or her symptoms take place. The plot is then transmitted via the internet to the centre, which can thus diagnose a relapse of AF. The aim of our study is to correlate the rhythm and symptoms of 20 patients with Vitaphone 6 months after AF ablation and to compare them with 20 other patients receiving conventional monitoring.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common atrial arrhythmia in the population and its incidence will increase in the coming years. Ablation of AF is a recent technique, the efficiency of which has considerably increased in recent years. Nevertheless, the success rates of ablation vary between 50% and 70% depending on the paroxysmal or persistent nature of AF. These rates are difficult to assess in routine practice because they are based on the recurrence of fibrillation. This definition of recurrence based on symptoms (palpitations, asthenia, fatigue, shortness of breath, malaise, precordialgia) is widely debated because some patients have asymptomatic AF recidivism, while others experience palpitations that are not due to AF. In this context, studies have been carried out with electrocardiographic recording devices implanted subcutaneously. Given the invasiveness of this monitoring, it is not feasible in current practice. The Vitaphone is a non-invasive device, with which the patient can record a single-track ECG as his or her symptoms take place. The plot is then transmitted via the internet to the centre, which can thus diagnose a relapse of AF. The aim of our study is to correlate the rhythm and symptoms of 20 patients with Vitaphone 6 months after AF ablation and to compare them with 20 other patients receiving conventional monitoring. This is, to our knowledge, the first non-invasive French study using the Vitaphone.

Interventions

DEVICEECG monitoring & record

This is a mobile ECG recorder that not only records short portions of ECG on one or three leads, but also stores, processes and transmits their data to facilitate the diagnosis and to confirm the occurrence of AF arrhythmia episodes by the physician.

Conventional follow-up

Sponsors

Dr Alexis MECHULAN
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ramsay Générale de Santé
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* AF ablated patient * Patient with paroxysmal AF before the procedure * Patient with health insurance or beneficiary of a social security scheme * Unprotected adult patient * Patient having given their consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient having undergone an AF ablation due to persistent AF * Unable to understand or handle the Vitaphone alone * Failure to participate * Minors * Pregnant, lactating or parturient women * Adult receiving psychiatric care, under legal protection, trusteeship or guardianship, or deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence rate of AF between 3 and 6 months3 to 6 monthsAtrial arrhythmia documented in each arm by either an ECG or Holter or Vitaphone between 3 and 6 months post-ablation of paroxysmal AF and validated by a cardiologist.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactJean Francois OUDET
jf.oudet@ecten.eu+33683346567
Backup ContactMarie Barba
mh.barba@ecten.eu+330664888704

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026