RM Program
Conditions
Brief summary
Sustainability can be defined by several dimensions: the pursuit of program elements, the maintenance of its effectiveness, its integration into work processes, the adaptation of the program to the local context, its integration into the organizational culture, the dissemination of the program to other centres. Studies show that the continuation of the entire intervention is rare once the research stops. The PRisM study (Pluriprofessionality and Risk Management through a Multifaceted Program in Primary Care) was a primary care risk management (RM) research project. Its purpose was to develop a safety culture within the participating multi-professional primary care structures. From 2015 to 2017, multi-professional primary care offices participated in the study, half of which implemented a RM program consisting of: 1) Training on RM in the context of primary care; 2) The appointment of a RM referent; 3) The conduct of six meetings of systematic analysis of incidents. The PRisM study represents a favorable ground for the development of a methodology for evaluating the sustainability of a RM program in primary care.
Interventions
OTHERSustainability of a research program in risk management
No intervention will be implemented in the present study. The investigators will evaluate of the sustainability of a research program in risk management in pluriprofessional primary care offices: * Qualitatively assessed safety culture and Sustainability of the PRisM RM program in the offices by interviews of professional belonging to the offices. * Quantitatively assessed safety climate in the offices measured by the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPS) Questionnaire (fill in by the professionals of the offices)
Sponsors
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Volontary pluriprofessional primary care offices * Having participated in the PRiSM study
Exclusion criteria
* office that waived participation in the PRisM study course * office with a participation rate in the first PRisM safety climate survey \< 30%. * office of the PRisM study intervention group that did not implement the program as planned
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| patient safety culture | 24 months from the end of the PRiSM study in 2017 (2019) | \- Qualitatively assessed through the model developed for health by Reiman, which apprehends the safety culture through organizational dimensions, social processes and psychological dimensions |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactPauline OCCELLI, MD
Backup ContactKarine POYAU, PhD
Outcome results
None listed