Skip to content

Stent Therapy Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy

Endoscopic Management of ESOphago-gastric Anastomotic LEAKages (EsoLeak): Stent Therapy Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03962244
Acronym
EsoLeak
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-05-23
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2021-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leaks, Anastomotic

Keywords

Esophagectomy, Esophageal Cancer, Vacuum therapy, Stents

Brief summary

Exploratory study of the efficiency of endoscopic stenting versus endoscopic vacuum therapy in patients with intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomotic leakage after oncological resection of the esophagus.

Detailed description

We analyze the outcome of using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in the treatment of postoperative leakage after esophagogastrostomy.

Interventions

DEVICEEsoSponge

Endoscopically placed an EsoSponge for Negative pressure wound therapy in the area of the esophagogastric anastomotic leaks

DEVICESelf-Expanding Metal Stent

Endoscopically placed self-expanding-metal-stent (SEMS) for negative pressure wound therapy in the area of the esophagogastric anastomotic leaks

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital of Cologne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed oesophageal carcinoma or similarly operated neoplasia (e.g., GIST, NET, subepithelial tumors) * Esophagectomy with an intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis * Radiologically or endoscopically diagnosed esophago-gastric anastomotic leakage * Clinical symptoms / symptoms due to insufficiency or increase in signs of inflammation, most likely as a result of anastomotic leakage * Age ≥18 years * To empower the patient to understand the scope of the study and its consequences or information, to consent to it and to sign the educational documents. * Written declaration of consent of the patient to be included. If the patient is unable to sign by hand, a witness must confirm the oral examination by signature.

Exclusion criteria

* Macroscopically incompletely resected tumor (R2), palliative resection * Endoscopically verified necrosis or critical ischemia of the anastomotic region of the interponate * Size of insufficiency more than 50% of circumference * Impossibility of radiological interventional insertion of a drainage * Early anastomotic leak (≤ 48 hours postoperatively), late insufficiencies (\> 4 weeks) * Therapeutic anticoagulation * Severe septic shock that indicates surgical therapy * Pregnant and lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction of treatment assessed by EORTC QLQ - OES186 monthsAssessing the quality of life of patients during the treatment of stent and EVT with a questionnaire by EORTC QLQ - OES18. This Questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactSeung-Hun Chon, MD
seung-hun.chon@uk-koeln.de+49221478 4864
Backup ContactChristiane Bruns, MD
Christiane.bruns@uk-koeln.de0049221 478 4801

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026