Skip to content

Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

SMART (Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy) for Localized Prostate Cancer; a Phase II Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03961321
Acronym
SMART
Enrollment
104
Registered
2019-05-23
Start date
2016-08-25
Completion date
2019-04-17
Last updated
2019-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

SMART, Prostate cancer, SBRT, MRgRT, Toxicity

Brief summary

Rationale: This prospective study investigates the outcomes of daily online stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Visualization of the prostate, rectum and bladder prior to and during radiation delivery can be used to deliver gated treatment (beam-on only when the prostate is in the predetermined position) using small uncertainty margins. The novel MRIdian treatment delivery system (ViewRay, USA), which will be used for this study, allows for the immediate generation of an optimal radiotherapy plan based on the current anatomy of the prostate and surrounding normal organs prior to each fraction. These major advances will (i.e. dosimetrically) allow for an optimisation of normal tissue radiation doses, which should theoretically decrease toxicity to surrounding organs such as the rectum or bladder. Another advantage of this approach is that online MR-based prostate imaging does not rely on implanted gold markers, avoiding an invasive procedure to insert such markers. If proven feasible, this approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer. The main goal of this phase II study of SMART for prostate cancer is to evaluate the early and early-delayed toxicity, i.e. within the first year after treatment. An established 5-fraction hypofractionated radiation scheme will be used in this trial. Main outcome parameters will include gastro-intestinal, genitourinary and sexual symptoms, which will be monitored at fixed time points using CTCAE criteria. In addition, patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using EORTC-QOL questionnaires. Objective: To investigate the early and early-delayed toxicity profile of SMART in patients with localized prostate cancer. Study design:phase II observational study Study population: 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Study intervention: Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions Main study parameters: Early and early-delayed toxicity (CTCAE v. 4.0); (IPSS) and Qol C30 PR25. Secondary endpoint will be the offline evaluation of the dosimetric benefit of SMART by comparing cumulative doses to organs at risk.

Detailed description

Rationale: This prospective study investigates the outcomes of daily online stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Visualization of the prostate, rectum and bladder prior to and during radiation delivery can be used to deliver gated treatment (beam-on only when the prostate is in the predetermined position) using small uncertainty margins. The novel MRIdian treatment delivery system (ViewRay, USA), which will be used for this study, allows for the immediate generation of an optimal radiotherapy plan based on the current anatomy of the prostate and surrounding normal organs prior to each fraction. These major advances will (i.e. dosimetrically) allow for an optimisation of normal tissue radiation doses, which should theoretically decrease toxicity to surrounding organs such as the rectum or bladder. Another advantage of this approach is that online MR-based prostate imaging does not rely on implanted gold markers, avoiding an invasive procedure to insert such markers. If proven feasible, this approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer. The main goal of this phase II study of SMART for prostate cancer is to evaluate the early and early-delayed toxicity, i.e. within the first year after treatment. An established 5-fraction hypofractionated radiation scheme will be used in this trial. At VUmc, experience with this scheme has been obtained as a result of participation in a recently concluded multicenter randomized phase II trial \[METc NL4181402912; 20012/398\]. Main outcome parameters will include gastro-intestinal- (GI), genitourinary- (GU) and sexual symptoms, which will be monitored at fixed time points using CTCAE criteria. In addition, patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using EORTC-QOL questionnaires. Objective: To investigate the early and early-delayed toxicity profile of SMART in patients with localized prostate cancer. Study design: A phase II observational study Study population: 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Study intervention: Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing (SIS) of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy per fraction). This stereotactic radiation scheme was also used in \[METc NL4181402912; 20012/398\]. Main study parameters: Early and early-delayed toxicity (CTCAE v. 4.0); prostate specific symptom score (IPSS) and Qol (EORTC-QoL C30 & QLQ Prostate Cancer module (QLQ-PR25)). Secondary endpoint will be the offline evaluation of the dosimetric benefit of SMART by comparing cumulative doses to organs at risk. Nature, extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This novel SMART approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer by limiting radiation doses to surrounding normal organs and thereby potentially radiation-induced toxicity. Also, implantation of gold markers would become unnecessary using MR-guided gated radiotherapy. Disadvantages for patients include the need to be positioned within the MRI bore during radiation delivery, and a prolonged time per treatment fraction (estimated at 30 minutes per fraction), which has to be weighed against the use of a total of only five fractions. As the radiation fractionation scheme that is used in this study has been evaluated in prior trials, no further patient-related risks are anticipated.

Interventions

RADIATIONstereotactic mr guided adaptive radiotherapy

Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing (SIS) of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy per fraction).

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 18 years or older * WHO performance score 0-2 * Biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate * Gleason ≥ 6 * Prostate volume ≤ 90 cc on TRUS * T-stage: cT1c-T3b (on MRI and/or endorectal ultrasound) * All patients should be able to undergo MRI scans * No evidence of lymph node or distant metastases on radiological staging * The multidisciplinary team advised external beam radiotherapy treatment * IPSS (International Prostate Symptoms Score) ≤19 * Previous TURP is allowed provided there is at least 8 weeks interval with radiotherapy * The administration of concomitant hormonal therapy is allowed * Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous irradiation in the pelvic region * Contra-indications for MRI * As no safety data for 0.35 Tesla MRI scanners are available on electronic devices such as pacemakers or implanted defibrillators, deep brain stimulators, cochlear implants, this constitutes an absolute contraindication for this study, even for devices that have been considered safe for MRI scans with higher magnetic field strengths. * Patients who have a metallic foreign body in their eye, or who have an aneurysm clip in their brain, cannot have an MRI scan since the magnetic field may dislodge the metal * Patients with severe claustrophobia may not be able to tolerate an MRI scan * Patients with a hip prosthesis will not be eligible for the MRI scan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early gastrointestinal toxicitydetermined at 3 monthsCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Late gastrointestinal toxicitydetermined at 12 monthsCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Early genitourinary toxicitydetermined at 3 monthsCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Late genitourinary toxicitydetermined at 12 monthsCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Early quality of life (QoL)determined at 3 monthsEORTC QoL core questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Early prostate specific quality of life (QoL)determined at 3 monthsEORTC QLQ-PR25
Late quality of life (QoL)determined at 12 monthsEORTC QoL core questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Late prostate specific quality of life (QoL)determined at 12 monthsEORTC QLQ-PR25

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026