Skip to content

Two-drug Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Scheduled Cesarean Deliveries

Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis in Scheduled Cesarean Deliveries

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03960970
Enrollment
800
Registered
2019-05-23
Start date
2019-09-15
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2019-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometritis, Cesarean Section; Infection, Wound Infection

Keywords

Cesarean Delivery, Endometritis, Wound Infection, Azithromycin, Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Brief summary

Cesarean deliveries are the most common surgical procedure performed in the United States. A significant decrease in cesarean delivery associated maternal morbidity has been achieved with preoperative prophylactic single-dose cephalosporin, widely used before skin incision. Also, on laboring patients and/or with rupture of membranes, several studies suggest that adding azithromycin to standard cephalosporin prophylaxis is cost-effective and reduces overall rates of endometritis, wound infection, readmission, use of antibiotics and serious maternal events. Azithromycin has effective coverage against Ureaplasma, associated with increased rates of endometritis. Although two-drug regimen has been suggested for laboring and/or patients that undergo cesarean delivery, no studies have investigated the potential benefits of two-drug regimen in non-laboring patients.

Detailed description

Cesarean deliveries are the most common surgical procedure performed in the United States, and scheduled cesarean deliveries account for at least 40% of all cesarean deliveries every year. A significant decrease in cesarean delivery associated maternal morbidity has been achieved with preoperative prophylactic single-dose cephalosporin given within 60 minutes of skin incision. Also, on laboring patients and/or with rupture of membranes, several studies suggest that adding azithromycin to standard cephalosporin prophylaxis is not only cost-effective but reduces overall rates of endometritis and wound infection. Azithromycin provides effective coverage against Ureaplasma, commonly associated with increased rates of endometritis. Although two-drug regimen has been suggested for laboring and/or patients that undergo cesarean delivery, no studies have investigated the potential benefits of two-drug regimen in non-laboring patients. No increase in neonatal morbidity was noted with adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis, including adverse events.

Interventions

Additional IV Azithromycin 500 mg to Standard Prophylaxis

DRUGMefoxin 2g

Standard Prophylaxis

Sponsors

RWJ Barnabas Health at Jersey City Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pregnant patients admitted to Labor and Delivery unit between June 2019 and July 2020 will be randomized to received either standard prophylaxis or azithromycin and cephalosporin for preoperative prophylaxis after inclusion and exclusion criteria are met and informed consent for participation is signed.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women 18 years or older * Women undergoing primary or repeat cesarean delivery * Singleton gestation * Gestational age greater than 34 weeks * Pregnant patients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery * Intact membranes * Non-laboring * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Maternal age \< 18 years * Multi-fetal gestation * Known allergy to cephalosporin or azithromycin * Patient unwilling or unable to provide consent * Diagnosis of rupture of membranes * Intraamniotic infection, or any other active bacterial infection (e.g. pyelonephritis, pneumonia, abscess) at time of randomization. * Immunocompromising medical conditions: HIV positive with CD4 count below 200, chronic steroid use, current diagnosis of cancer and/or chemotherapy age use * Emergent cesarean precluding consent or availability of study medication * Need for hysterectomy at time of delivery * Use of antibiotic in the 72 hours prior to admission, with exception to patient receiving antibiotics for GBS * Inability to contact patient on postpartum period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rates of EndometritisUp to 6 weeks after deliveryPresence of at least two of the following signs with no other recognized cause: fever (temperature of at least 38°C \[100.4°F\]), abdominal pain, uterine tenderness, or purulent drainage from the uterus.
Rates of Wound InfectionUp to 6 weeks after deliveryPresence of either superficial or deep incisional surgical-site infection characterized by cellulitis or erythema and induration around the incision or purulent discharge from the incision site with or without fever and included necrotizing fasciitis. Wound hematoma, seroma, abscess or breakdown alone in the absence of the preceding signs did not constitute infection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rates of Maternal Postpartum Readmission or Unscheduled VisitUp to 6 weeks after deliveryAdmission to hospital or unscheduled appointment in additional to regular 1-week and 6-week postpartum visit
Rates of Serious Adverse EventsUp to 6 weeks after deliveryMICU admission, thromboembolic events, sepsis, maternal death
Rates of Postpartum Antibiotic UseUp to 6 weeks after deliveryAntibiotic use for any reason including other infections such as UTI and sepsis.
Rates of Maternal FeverUp to 6 weeks after deliveryTemperature equal or greater than 100.4F

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rates of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) AdmissionUp to 6 weeks after deliveryNeonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission rather than prematurity
Rates of Neonatal ReadmissionUp to 6 weeks after deliveryHospital readmission within 6 weeks of birth

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactTali Wajsfeld, MD
tali.wajsfeld@rwjbh.org2019152000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026