Skip to content

Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of OPN-375 in Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without the Presence of Nasal Polyps

A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of 186 and 372 μg of OPN-375 Twice a Day (BID) in Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without the Presence of Nasal Polyps

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03960580
Enrollment
223
Registered
2019-05-23
Start date
2019-06-06
Completion date
2022-05-04
Last updated
2023-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Brief summary

This is a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 186 and 372 μg twice daily (BID) of OPN-375 in subjects with chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of twice-daily doses of 186 and 372 µg of OPN-375 (fluticasone propionate) with placebo in subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis using the following co-primary endpoints: 1. A change from baseline in symptoms as measured by the average morning composite score of nasal congestion, facial pain or pressure sensation, and nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior) at the end of Week 4. 2. A change from baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the average percent of the volume opacified in the ethmoid and maxillary sinuses.

Interventions

OPN-375, BID

Sponsors

Optinose US Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. men or women aged 18 years and older at baseline visit 2. women of child bearing potential must be abstinent, or if sexually active, 1. be practicing an effective method of birth control (eg, prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method \[eg, condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel\], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or 2. be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation, or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy), or 3. be postmenopausal (amenorrhea for at least 1 year) 3. women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Screening) 4. must have a history of chronic sinusitis and be currently experiencing 2 or more of the following symptoms, 1 of which has to be either nasal congestion or nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior nasal discharge) for equal to or greater than 12 weeks: * nasal congestion * nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior nasal discharge) * facial pain or pressure * reduction or loss of smell 5. endoscopic evidence of nasal mucosal disease, with edema or purulent discharge; or polyps/polypoid tissue \<Grade 1 in middle meatus, bilaterally 6. must have confirmatory evidence via a computed tomography(CT) scan of bilateral sinus disease (have at least 1 sinus on each side of nose with a Lund-Mackay score of ≥1) 7. baseline CT scan must show a combined ≥25% opacification of the ethmoid sinuses and ≥25% opacification of at least 1 maxillary sinus 8. must have at least moderate symptoms (as defined in protocol) of nasal congestion as reported by the subject, on average, for the 7-day period preceding Visit 1 (Screening) run-in 9. must have an average morning score of at least 1.5 for congestion on the Nasal Symptom Scale (as defined in protocol) recorded on the subject diary over a 7-day period during the first 14 days of the single-blind run-in period 10. must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization 11. Subjects with comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening). Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening) with plans to continue use throughout the study. 12. Subjects with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, who have undergone aspirin desensitization and are receiving daily aspirin therapy, must be receiving therapy for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1. 13. must be able to cease treatment with intranasal steroids, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for asthma and COPD) at the screening visit. 14. must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at Visit 1 (Screening) 15. must be able to use the exhalation delivery system correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use with the practice exhalation delivery system (EDS) at Visit 1 (Screening). 16. must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. women who are pregnant or lactating 2. inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason, including nasal septum deviation 3. inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow 4. is currently taking XHANCE® 5. have previously used XHANCE® for more than 1 month and did not achieve an adequate symptomatic response 6. the nasal/sinus anatomy prevents the accurate assessment of sinus volume via CT scan 7. history of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before Visit 1 or has not healed from a prior sinus or nasal surgery 8. have current evidence of odontogenic sinusitis, sinus mucocele (the affected sinus is completely opacified and either the margins are expanded and/or thinned OR there are areas of complete bone resorption resulting in bony defect and extension of the mass into adjacent tissues), evidence of allergic fungal sinusitis, or evidence of complicated sinus disease (including, but not limited to, extension of inflammation outside of the sinuses and nasal cavity) 9. have a paranasal sinus or nasal tumor 10. have polyp grade ≥1 (polyp that is free on 5 sides and has a stalk) on either side of the nose as determined by the nasoendoscopy at screening 11. have a nasal septum perforation 12. have had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before Visit 1 (Screening) 13. have evidence of significant mucosal injury, ulceration (eg, exposed cartilage) on Visit 1 (Screening) nasal examination/nasoendoscopy 14. have current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis) 15. have significant oral structural abnormalities (eg, a cleft palate) 16. have a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis 17. history of Churg-Strauss syndrome or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes 18. symptom resolution or last dose of antibiotics for purulent nasal infection, acute sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection has not occurred before Visit 1 or was less than 4 weeks before the CT scan. Potential subjects presenting with any of these infections may be rescreened 4 weeks after symptom resolution. 19. planned sinonasal surgery during the period of the study 20. allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to corticosteroids or steroids 21. has used oral steroids in the past for treatment of chronic sinusitis and did not experience any relief of symptoms 22. has a steroid eluting sinus stent still in place within 30 days of Visit 1 23. allergy or hypersensitivity to any excipients in study drug 24. exposure to any glucocorticoid treatment with potential for systemic effects (eg, oral, parenteral, intraarticular, or epidural steroids, high dose topical steroids) within 1 month before Visit 1 (Screening); except as noted in inclusion criteria for subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD 25. have nasal candidiasis 26. history or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension 27. history of intraocular pressure elevation on any form of steroid therapy 28. history or current diagnosis of the presence (in either eye) of a subcapsular cataract 29. history of immunodeficiency 30. any serious or unstable concurrent disease, psychiatric disorder, or any significant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator could confound the results of the study or could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study 31. have a positive drug screen or a recent (within 1 year of Visit 1 \[Screening\]) history of drug or alcohol abuse, or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study 32. have participated in an investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of Visit 1 (Screening) 33. have received mepolizumab (Nucala®), reslizumab (Cinquair®), dupilumab (Dupixent®), omalizumab (Xolair®), or benralizumab (Fasenra™) within 6 months of Visit 1 (Screening) 34. is using strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors (eg, ritonavir, atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, saquinavir, ketoconazole, telithromycin, conivaptan, lopinavir, voriconazole) 35. is an employee of the investigator or study center, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study center, or is a family member of the employee or the investigator. 36. patients who report unexplained worsening of vision within the past 3 months (e.g. difficulty reading or seeing traffic signs from a distance). A diagnosis of presbyopia established by an eye care professional is not exclusionary.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 44 WeeksChange from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified (APOV) in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses.Baseline, Week 24Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for the Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined24 WeeksLund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The values reported for this outcome are the change in total opacification of the left an dright maxillary and ethmoid sinuses (Visit 6 \[Wk 24\] score minus Baseline score). Each visit score can range from a total of 0-12 (sum of 0-2 score assigned for each of left and right maxillary, left and right anterior ethmoid, and left and right posterior ethmoid).
Change in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™24 WeeksThe SIT is a test comprised of 4 booklets each containing 10 microencapsulated (scratch and sniff) odors. Forced choice response alternatives accompany each test item. Each correct response is assigned a score of 1 and incorrect responses are assigned a score of 0. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of each individual odor for a total possible score ranging from 0-40. The higher the score, the better the individual's sense of smell. The test provides an absolute indication of smell loss (anosmia; mild, moderate or sever hyposmia) as well as an index to detect malingering.
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument24 WeeksThe EQ-5D consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The outcome measured for this study was the EQ VAS, which records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled The best health you can imagine and The worst health you can imagine. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement. VAS scores range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument24 WeeksThe SF-6D is a single health state index derived from the 11 items from the SF-36v2. SF-6D scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state). The values provided in the outcome data are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Visit 6 (Week 24).
Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24Baseline, Week 24Percentage of subjects indicating that they are willing to consider Sinus Surgery. This is a comparison of health economic measures and data was obtained by direct questioning of the subjects during study visits.
Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.Baseline, Week 24Percentage of subjects who meet the minimal objective criteria for surgical intervention based on completion of a surgical intervention assessment questionnaire for the investigator.
Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a SurgeryWeek 24Outcome value presented here is the percent of subjects who are approved for surgery but no longer elect to undergo a surgery. Number of participants analyzed indicates the total number of participants for whom this analysis was completed.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Baseline, Week 4The 4 individual CRS symptoms are: congestion, facial pain or pressure sensation, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), and sense of smell. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The scores at baseline and week 4 are calculated by averaging the score reported for the individual symptom over 7 days prior to the timepoint. The value provided in the results is calculated by subtracting the score at Week 4 from the score at Baseline; therefore, scores reported here can range from -3 to 3.
Time to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis24 WeeksComparing the distribution of time to first acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis across treatment groups. An exacerbation of chronic sinusitis is defined as a worsening of symptoms that requires escalation of treatment.
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains24 WeeksThe SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 symptoms and social/emotional consequences of their nasal disorder across several domains including: rhinologic, extra-nasal rhinologic, ear/facial pain, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction. Total scores range from 0-110. The score range for each domain are as follows: Rhinologic: 0-30; Extra-nasal rhinologic: 0-15; Ear/facial: 0-25; Psychological dysfunction: 0-35; Sleep dysfunction: 0-25. Each item is rated as follows: 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem, 3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be, and total scores are calculated by adding scores together. The values reported here are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Week 24 and, therefore, can range from the negative maximum score value to the positive maximum score value.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.8 weeks, 12 weeks.Change from baseline in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Range of scores for each symptom is 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The composite score is the sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0-9. Scores reported at each timepoint are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days before the given timepoint. The values presented here are calculated by subtracting the score at Baseline from Week 8 and Week 12, respectively.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom Scores8 Weeks; 12 WeeksSubjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresBaseline, Week 8, Week 12Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) scores. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresBaseline, Week 8, Week 12Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresBaseline, Week 8, Week 12Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The sense of smell scored as 0= normal, 1=slightly impaired, 2=moderately impaired, 3=absent.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus SurgeryBaseline, Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT for subgroups in patients without and without previous sinus surgery. Percent volume opacified of the combined ethmoid and maxillary sinuses can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total ScoreBaseline, Week 24Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The total LM score for a CT scan ranges from 0-24.
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairBaseline, Week 24Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification). Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-4 (sum of 0-2 for each side). The values reported below are calculated by subtracting the total score at baseline from the total score at Visit 6 (week 24).
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.Baseline, Week 24Percent volume opacified of the worst maxillary sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst maxillary sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same maxillary sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.24 weeksPercent volume opacified of the worst ethmoid sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst ethmoid sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same ethmoid sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.24 weeksPercent volume opacified of the worst sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total ScoreBaseline, Week 24Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% for each each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal). Total score ranges from 0 to 50.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Baseline, Week 24Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100%. Each of the following sinus pairs can achieve a total score of 0-10 (sum of score on each left and right side): anterior ethmoids, posterior ethmoids, maxillary sinuses, frontal sinuses, sphenoid sinuses. The values reported for this outcome are calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined24 weeksZinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%. The total score for the combined ethmoids and maxillary sinuses can range from 0-30 (0-5 for each left and right of the anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses). The outcome values presented in the results were determined by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Week 24.
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations24 WeeksZinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%. Data provided for full population and with and without prior sinus surgery subgroups. Number of participants analyzed in the subgroups will be less than the total overall, as these are only portions of the total population.
Change in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)12 Weeks, 24 WeeksThe PSQI is a validated, self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 component scores (each ranging between 0 and 3): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these 7 components yields 1 global score ranging between 0 and 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Change in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4, Week 24Global impression of change will be assessed using a subject-completed PGIC scale range: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse. Values provided for this outcome measure are the percentage of subjects reporting a score of 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, or 3 - Minimally improved at each timepoint.
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)24 WeeksThe SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, 36-item subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The SF-36v2 survey with a 4-week recall will be used. It yields scale scores for each of these 8 health domains , each of which is scored from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health status, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.
Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Score (MCS).24 WeeksChange from baseline to Week 24/ET on the MCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.
Change in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS)24 WeeksChange from baseline to Week 24/ET on the PCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.
Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)24 WeeksThe 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)24 WeeksThe 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Results reported for this outcome measure are the

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse24 WeeksMeasure pulse in beats per minute (bpm)
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight24 WeeksAssessment of safety from physical examination-weight measured in kg or lb
Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage24 WeeksAssessment for safety from the collection of information for concomitant medications usage. Top 5 reported con-meds by therapeutic class are listed for this outcome.
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination24 WeeksAssessed in nasal examination worksheet which includes recording the presence of any epistaxis, septal erosion/perforation, ulceration/erosion of area other than septum.
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood Pressure24 WeeksIncludes systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Evaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)24 WeeksAssessment of safety by measuring severity of AEs using scale with 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Czechia, Georgia, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
75
OPN-375 186 μg BID
OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
73
OPN-375 372 μg BID
OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks OPN-375: OPN-375, BID
74
Total222

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event211
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy210
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyMarked Randomized in error (patient did not receive study drug)010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOPN-375 186 μg BIDPlaceboOPN-375 372 μg BIDTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants8 Participants11 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
65 Participants67 Participants63 Participants195 Participants
Age, Continuous47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.34
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.53
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
71 Participants74 Participants74 Participants219 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Beclomethasone
2 participants2 participants2 participants6 participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Budesonide
3 participants7 participants2 participants12 participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Fluticasone and azelastine
13 participants14 participants13 participants40 participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Fluticasone furoate
23 participants28 participants24 participants75 participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Fluticasone proprionate
15 participants20 participants16 participants51 participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Mometasone furoate
28 participants38 participants35 participants101 participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Other
2 participants2 participants2 participants6 participants
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within last 10 years
Triamcinolone
2 participants2 participants1 participants5 participants
Other Chronic Sinusitis Treatment History
Plan to continue on saline lavage during study (decided at baseline visit)
15 participants20 participants13 participants48 participants
Other Chronic Sinusitis Treatment History
Systemic antibiotic in last 5 years
10 participants19 participants19 participants48 participants
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Any Surgery
30 participants32 participants31 participants93 participants
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Balloon sinuplasty
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Endoscopic sinus surgery
28 participants26 participants30 participants84 participants
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Other surgery
3 participants7 participants7 participants17 participants
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Polypectomy alone
2 participants5 participants7 participants14 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
72 Participants74 Participants73 Participants219 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
6 Participants6 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
8 Participants7 Participants7 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
37 Participants36 Participants30 Participants103 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
9 Participants6 Participants9 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants5 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants32 Participants39 Participants111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants43 Participants35 Participants111 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans
0
25 Participants31 Participants32 Participants88 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans
1
46 Participants41 Participants41 Participants128 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans
2
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
CT Scans
3
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans
0
73 Participants71 Participants71 Participants215 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans
1
0 Participants4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans
2
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sinus Imaging in last year
MRI Scans
3
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking History
Current Cigarette Smoker
12 participants6 participants4 participants22 participants
Smoking History
Current Smoker (other forms of tobacco)
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 750 / 730 / 74
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 7517 / 7343 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 751 / 734 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4

Change from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4-0.81 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.202
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4-1.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.204
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4-1.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.204
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified (APOV) in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses.

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified (APOV) in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses.1.19 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 1.74
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified (APOV) in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses.-7.00 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 1.725
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified (APOV) in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses.-5.14 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 1.742
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains

The SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 symptoms and social/emotional consequences of their nasal disorder across several domains including: rhinologic, extra-nasal rhinologic, ear/facial pain, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction. Total scores range from 0-110. The score range for each domain are as follows: Rhinologic: 0-30; Extra-nasal rhinologic: 0-15; Ear/facial: 0-25; Psychological dysfunction: 0-35; Sleep dysfunction: 0-25. Each item is rated as follows: 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem, 3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be, and total scores are calculated by adding scores together. The values reported here are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Week 24 and, therefore, can range from the negative maximum score value to the positive maximum score value.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsRhinologic Symptoms Domain Score-2.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.649
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsTotal Score-8.72 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.186
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsExtra-Nasal Rhinologic Symptoms Domain Score-1.61 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.411
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsEar/Facial Symptoms Domain Score-1.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.613
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsPsychological Dysfunction Domain Score-1.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.951
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsSleep Dysfunction Domain Score-1.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsSleep Dysfunction Domain Score-4.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.622
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsPsychological Dysfunction Domain Score-5.81 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.955
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsTotal Score-19.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.197
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsEar/Facial Symptoms Domain Score-4.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.616
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsRhinologic Symptoms Domain Score-5.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.653
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsExtra-Nasal Rhinologic Symptoms Domain Score-2.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.413
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsRhinologic Symptoms Domain Score-4.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.656
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsExtra-Nasal Rhinologic Symptoms Domain Score-2.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.415
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsSleep Dysfunction Domain Score-3.61 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.626
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsEar/Facial Symptoms Domain Score-3.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.619
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsTotal Score-15.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.219
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub DomainsPsychological Dysfunction Domain Score-4.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.965
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.

Percent volume opacified of the worst ethmoid sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst ethmoid sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same ethmoid sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-2.79 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 1.928
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-9.65 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 1.92
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-6.82 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 1.928
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.

Percent volume opacified of the worst maxillary sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst maxillary sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same maxillary sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-5.83 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.734
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-14.50 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.708
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-10.21 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.724
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.

Percent volume opacified of the worst sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-6.07 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.493
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-14.02 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.439
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.-10.75 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.448
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery

Change from Baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT for subgroups in patients without and without previous sinus surgery. Percent volume opacified of the combined ethmoid and maxillary sinuses can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set population sizes provided as overall number of participants analyzed. Subgroup population sizes provided with each set of results below.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus SurgeryPatients with prior sinus surgery3.89 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.882
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus SurgeryPatients without prior sinus surgery-0.53 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.118
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus SurgeryPatients with prior sinus surgery-5.86 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.862
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus SurgeryPatients without prior sinus surgery-7.83 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.129
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus SurgeryPatients with prior sinus surgery-6.73 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.873
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus SurgeryPatients without prior sinus surgery-4.50 percentage of opacificationStandard Error 2.166
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus Pair

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification). Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-4 (sum of 0-2 for each side). The values reported below are calculated by subtracting the total score at baseline from the total score at Visit 6 (week 24).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairFrontal Sinus Pair0.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.093
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairMaxillary Sinus Pair0.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.052
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairAnterior Ethmoid Pair0.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairPosterior Ethmoid Pair0.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairSphenoid Sinus Pair0.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.078
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairMaxillary Sinus Pair0.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.049
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairAnterior Ethmoid Pair0.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairPosterior Ethmoid Pair0.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairFrontal Sinus Pair-0.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairSphenoid Sinus Pair-0.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairSphenoid Sinus Pair0.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.078
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairFrontal Sinus Pair-0.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairAnterior Ethmoid Pair0.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairMaxillary Sinus Pair0.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.049
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus PairPosterior Ethmoid Pair-0.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for the Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The values reported for this outcome are the change in total opacification of the left an dright maxillary and ethmoid sinuses (Visit 6 \[Wk 24\] score minus Baseline score). Each visit score can range from a total of 0-12 (sum of 0-2 score assigned for each of left and right maxillary, left and right anterior ethmoid, and left and right posterior ethmoid).

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for the Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined0.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.162
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for the Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined0.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for the Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined0.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The total LM score for a CT scan ranges from 0-24.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score0.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.332
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score-0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.327
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.329
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined

Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%. The total score for the combined ethmoids and maxillary sinuses can range from 0-30 (0-5 for each left and right of the anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses). The outcome values presented in the results were determined by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Week 24.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined0.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.568
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined-1.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined-1.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.546
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.

Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100%. Each of the following sinus pairs can achieve a total score of 0-10 (sum of score on each left and right side): anterior ethmoids, posterior ethmoids, maxillary sinuses, frontal sinuses, sphenoid sinuses. The values reported for this outcome are calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Frontal Sinus Pair0.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Maxillary Sinus Pair0.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Anterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.218
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Posterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.239
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Sphenoid Sinus Pair0.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.249
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Maxillary Sinus Pair-0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Anterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair-0.73 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.215
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Posterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair-0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Frontal Sinus Pair-0.37 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.245
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Sphenoid Sinus Pair-0.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.239
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Sphenoid Sinus Pair0.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.243
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Frontal Sinus Pair0.00 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.246
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Anterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair-0.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.217
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Maxillary Sinus Pair-0.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.202
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.Posterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair-0.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.236
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations

Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%. Data provided for full population and with and without prior sinus surgery subgroups. Number of participants analyzed in the subgroups will be less than the total overall, as these are only portions of the total population.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsPrior sinus surgery subgroup-0.37 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.228
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsTotal population-0.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.137
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsWithout prior sinus surgery subgroup-0.37 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.165
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsPrior sinus surgery subgroup-0.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.223
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsTotal population-0.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.135
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsWithout prior sinus surgery subgroup-1.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.167
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsTotal population-0.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.135
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsWithout prior sinus surgery subgroup-0.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.168
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient PopulationsPrior sinus surgery subgroup-0.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.225
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score

Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within partial opacification and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% for each each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal). Total score ranges from 0 to 50.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score0.73 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.815
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score-2.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.806
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score-1.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.816
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).

The 4 individual CRS symptoms are: congestion, facial pain or pressure sensation, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), and sense of smell. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The scores at baseline and week 4 are calculated by averaging the score reported for the individual symptom over 7 days prior to the timepoint. The value provided in the results is calculated by subtracting the score at Week 4 from the score at Baseline; therefore, scores reported here can range from -3 to 3.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Full analysis set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Facial Pain/Pressure-0.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Congestion/Obstruction-0.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Nasal Discharge-0.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Sense of Smell-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.066
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Congestion/Obstruction-0.60 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Nasal Discharge-0.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Sense of Smell-0.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.067
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Facial Pain/Pressure-0.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Facial Pain/Pressure-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Congestion/Obstruction-0.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Sense of Smell-0.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.067
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).Nasal Discharge-0.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.

Change from baseline in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Range of scores for each symptom is 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The composite score is the sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0-9. Scores reported at each timepoint are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days before the given timepoint. The values presented here are calculated by subtracting the score at Baseline from Week 8 and Week 12, respectively.

Time frame: 8 weeks, 12 weeks.

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change Total Population-1.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change Total Population-1.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change With Prior Surgery Population-1.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.347
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change With Prior Surgery Population-1.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.361
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change Without Prior Surgery Population-1.13 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.263
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change Without Prior Surgery Population-1.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.276
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change Without Prior Surgery Population-2.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.273
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change Total Population-2.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.212
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change With Prior Surgery Population-2.76 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.379
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change Without Prior Surgery Population-1.86 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change Total Population-2.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.223
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change With Prior Surgery Population-2.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.355
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change Total Population-2.60 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.223
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change With Prior Surgery Population-1.95 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.355
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change Without Prior Surgery Population-2.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.274
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 12 Change With Prior Surgery Population-2.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.375
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change Total Population-2.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.212
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.Week 8 Change Without Prior Surgery Population-2.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.084
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.089
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.089
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.66 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

Time frame: 8 Weeks; 12 Weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.40 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.078
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.69 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.76 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.91 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.97 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) scores. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.66 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.86 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The sense of smell scored as 0= normal, 1=slightly impaired, 2=moderately impaired, 3=absent.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 12-0.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in AM Score - Week 8-0.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 8-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom ScoresChange in PM Score - Week 12-0.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
Secondary

Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument

The EQ-5D consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The outcome measured for this study was the EQ VAS, which records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled The best health you can imagine and The worst health you can imagine. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement. VAS scores range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument2.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.889
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument9.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.88
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument7.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.891
Secondary

Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)

The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, 36-item subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The SF-36v2 survey with a 4-week recall will be used. It yields scale scores for each of these 8 health domains , each of which is scored from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health status, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Physical Functioning Score0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.012
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Role Physical Score0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.018
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Bodily Pain Score2.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.193
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)General Health Score-0.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Vitality Score0.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Social Functioning Score-0.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.173
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Role Emotional Score-0.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.133
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Mental Health score-1.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Bodily Pain Score5.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.205
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Role Emotional Score2.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.147
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)General Health Score4.71 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.025
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Vitality Score4.59 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.129
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Social Functioning Score4.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.186
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Physical Functioning Score3.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.023
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Role Physical Score5.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.029
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Mental Health score2.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.112
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Bodily Pain Score3.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.223
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Role Physical Score3.73 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.049
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Physical Functioning Score2.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.043
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)General Health Score2.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.037
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Role Emotional Score0.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.167
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Social Functioning Score1.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.204
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Vitality Score3.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.157
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)Mental Health score1.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.138
Secondary

Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument

The SF-6D is a single health state index derived from the 11 items from the SF-36v2. SF-6D scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state). The values provided in the outcome data are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Visit 6 (Week 24).

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument0.00 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.016
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument0.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.016
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument0.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.016
Secondary

Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)

The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)-0.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.306
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)-0.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.308
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)-0.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.312
Secondary

Change in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™

The SIT is a test comprised of 4 booklets each containing 10 microencapsulated (scratch and sniff) odors. Forced choice response alternatives accompany each test item. Each correct response is assigned a score of 1 and incorrect responses are assigned a score of 0. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of each individual odor for a total possible score ranging from 0-40. The higher the score, the better the individual's sense of smell. The test provides an absolute indication of smell loss (anosmia; mild, moderate or sever hyposmia) as well as an index to detect malingering.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™0.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.954
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™2.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.959
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™0.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.972
Secondary

Change in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Global impression of change will be assessed using a subject-completed PGIC scale range: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse. Values provided for this outcome measure are the percentage of subjects reporting a score of 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, or 3 - Minimally improved at each timepoint.

Time frame: Week 4, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set provided as overall number of participants. Number analyzed at each timepoint is the total number of responders at that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboChange in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 437 Participants
PlaceboChange in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 2442 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 447 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 2459 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 456 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 2463 Participants
Secondary

Change in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

The PSQI is a validated, self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 component scores (each ranging between 0 and 3): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these 7 components yields 1 global score ranging between 0 and 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame: 12 Weeks, 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Week 12-0.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.306
PlaceboChange in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Week 24-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.293
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Week 12-1.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Week 24-2.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.298
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Week 12-1.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.307
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Week 24-1.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.295
Secondary

Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Score (MCS).

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the MCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Score (MCS).-0.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.888
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Score (MCS).2.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.895
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Score (MCS).1.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.913
Secondary

Change in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS)

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the PCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS)2.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.712
OPN-375 186 μg BIDChange in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS)5.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.723
OPN-375 372 μg BIDChange in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS)4.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.738
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery

Outcome value presented here is the percent of subjects who are approved for surgery but no longer elect to undergo a surgery. Number of participants analyzed indicates the total number of participants for whom this analysis was completed.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Total number of responders in each treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery35 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery33 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery36 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24

Percentage of subjects indicating that they are willing to consider Sinus Surgery. This is a comparison of health economic measures and data was obtained by direct questioning of the subjects during study visits.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed is total number of responders.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24Baseline38 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24Week 2435 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24Baseline40 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24Week 2436 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24Baseline38 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24Week 2433 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.

Percentage of subjects who meet the minimal objective criteria for surgical intervention based on completion of a surgical intervention assessment questionnaire for the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed is total number of responders in each treatment group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.Baseline15 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.Week 2414 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.Baseline6 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.Week 243 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.Baseline15 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDPercentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.Week 2410 Participants
Secondary

Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)

The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Results reported for this outcome measure are the

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed is the total number of responders at Week 24.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Severe depression0 Participants
PlaceboSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Moderate depression0 Participants
PlaceboSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)No depression52 Participants
PlaceboSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Mild depression15 Participants
PlaceboSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Very severe depression2 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Moderate depression4 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)No depression55 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Mild depression12 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Severe depression0 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Very severe depression0 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Very severe depression0 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Severe depression1 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)No depression51 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Moderate depression2 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDSeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)Mild depression15 Participants
Secondary

Time to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis

Comparing the distribution of time to first acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis across treatment groups. An exacerbation of chronic sinusitis is defined as a worsening of symptoms that requires escalation of treatment.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis9.83 WeeksStandard Error 0.215
OPN-375 186 μg BIDTime to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis5.00 WeeksStandard Error 0
OPN-375 372 μg BIDTime to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis8.04 WeeksStandard Error 0.131
Other Pre-specified

Evaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

Assessment of safety by measuring severity of AEs using scale with 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Safety analysis set. Values provided for this outcome are the count of subjects with at least 1 AE in each category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Severe1 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Moderate17 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Mild13 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Moderate8 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Mild15 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Severe1 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Mild22 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Severe2 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)Moderate19 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood Pressure

Includes systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in millimeter of mercury (mmHg)

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure126.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.3
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure78.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.29
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure124.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.26
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure76.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.88
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure126.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.94
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure78.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.69
Other Pre-specified

Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse

Measure pulse in beats per minute (bpm)

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse73.7 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.37
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse74.1 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 6.76
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse72.1 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 8.18
Other Pre-specified

Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight

Assessment of safety from physical examination-weight measured in kg or lb

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight77.86 kgStandard Deviation 16.527
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight76.30 kgStandard Deviation 15.25
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight81.14 kgStandard Deviation 20.091
Other Pre-specified

Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage

Assessment for safety from the collection of information for concomitant medications usage. Top 5 reported con-meds by therapeutic class are listed for this outcome.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageHMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors8 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageOther Nasal Preparations (includes sodium chloride and sea water)22 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageAdrenergics in combination with corticosteroids or other drugs15 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageGlucocorticoids11 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageSelective Beta-2-adrenoreceptor Agonists11 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageGlucocorticoids9 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageSelective Beta-2-adrenoreceptor Agonists4 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageOther Nasal Preparations (includes sodium chloride and sea water)15 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageHMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors7 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageAdrenergics in combination with corticosteroids or other drugs9 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageSelective Beta-2-adrenoreceptor Agonists8 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageAdrenergics in combination with corticosteroids or other drugs19 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageGlucocorticoids7 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageHMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors9 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication UsageOther Nasal Preparations (includes sodium chloride and sea water)15 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination

Assessed in nasal examination worksheet which includes recording the presence of any epistaxis, septal erosion/perforation, ulceration/erosion of area other than septum.

Time frame: 24 Weeks

Population: Safety analysis set. Overall number analyzed is the total number of responders in each treatment group.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationEpistaxisNone71 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationEpistaxisPresent0 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationSeptal erosion/perforationNone70 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationSeptal erosion/perforationPresent1 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationUlceration/ErosionNone71 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationUlceration/ErosionPresent0 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationMucosal candidiasisNone71 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationMucosal candidiasisPresent0 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationSeptal erosion/perforationNone71 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationMucosal candidiasisNone71 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationSeptal erosion/perforationPresent0 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationUlceration/ErosionNone71 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationUlceration/ErosionPresent0 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationEpistaxisNone70 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationEpistaxisPresent1 Participants
OPN-375 186 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationMucosal candidiasisPresent0 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationSeptal erosion/perforationNone70 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationEpistaxisPresent4 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationEpistaxisNone68 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationSeptal erosion/perforationPresent2 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationMucosal candidiasisNone72 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationUlceration/ErosionPresent0 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationUlceration/ErosionNone72 Participants
OPN-375 372 μg BIDEvaluation of Safety-Nasal ExaminationMucosal candidiasisPresent0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026