Skip to content

The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Performed Under Direct Vision on Postoperative Pain in Spine Surgery

Investigation of Erector Spinae Plane Block Effect in Spine Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03960528
Acronym
ESPOUSES
Enrollment
56
Registered
2019-05-23
Start date
2019-04-18
Completion date
2020-02-10
Last updated
2021-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Keywords

spine surgery, postoperative pain, perioperative analgesia, postoperative opioid requirement

Brief summary

Spine surgery is typically associated with severe postoperative pain. Although the number of spine surgeries has increased day by day, postoperative pain management have been limited. The recently described erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is obtained by applying the local anesthetic drug between the fascia of the erector spinae muscles and the transverse process of the vertebrae. Anatomical and radiological investigations in fresh cadavers suggest that the potential place of influence of ESPB is dorsal and ventral spinal nerve roots. A small number of publications showing the analgesic efficacy of ESP in spinal surgery have been reported in the literature. The erector spinae muscles are easily identified during spine surgery, and erector spinae plane blocks can be performed under direct vision rather than via ultrasound guidance or simply using anatomical landmarks. Therefore, the investigators aim to observe the efficacy of the under direct vision erector spinae plane block on pain scores after spinal surgery.

Detailed description

Approval from the university local ethics committee will be obtained. Participans will be informed about the potential benefits and complications after the study protocol has been fully and thoroughly explained. After premedication with 0.03 mg / kg iv midazolam, participans will be noninvasively monitored by taking into the operating room (heart rate, blood pressure, pulse oximetry). Anesthesia induction will delivered with fentanyl 1mcg / kg, propofol 2 mg / kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg / kg. The maintenance of anesthesia will be achieved by infusion of sevoflurane 2-3% in 50% O2/50% medical air and remifentanil infusion of 0.1-0.5 mcg / kg / min. Thirty minutes before end of the surgery, all patients were intravenously administered 1 mg/kg tramadol HCl and 1gr paracetamol. Under direct vision ESPB technique: Erector spinae muscles and transverse processes will be identified by the surgeon. At the end of the surgery 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%/lidocaine 1% mixture will be injected to the between of the erector spinae muscles and transverse processes bilaterally. In the sham comparator group, 20 ml of isotonic saline will be administered bilaterally by the surgeon as described above. After the surgery, 1 g paracetamol was intravenously administered once every 8 h. A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, which was prepared using morphine, was attached to the patients and was programmed to administer concentration 0.5mg / ml ( 2cc bolus 8 min lock time 2cc/h infusion). This administration continued for 24 h. Postoperative pain was assessed using visuel analog scale (VAS) (VAS 0 = no pain, VAS 10 = most severe pain ). Duration at postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was recorded right from 0 h. VAS scores at 0, 1, 6, 12 and 24 h were recorded. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was evaluated using a numeric ranking scale (0 = no PONV, 1 = mild nausea, 2 = severe nausea or vomiting once attack, and 3 = vomiting more than once attack). If PONV score was \>2, the antiemetic metoclopramide Hcl 10mg was intravenously administered.

Interventions

PROCEDUREErector spinae plane block

Bilateral 20 ml Bupivacaine 0.25% + lidocaine 1% injected between erector spinae muscles and transverse process under direct vision.

PROCEDUREControl group

20 ml NaCl 0,9% used for the infiltration between the transverse process and the erector spinal muscle under direct vision on each side.

Sponsors

Bezmialem Vakif University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 20-75 years 2. ASA 1-2-3 3. Patients scheduled for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with previous neurological disease symptoms (TIA, syncope, dementia, etc.) 2. Allergy to drugs 3. Major cardiac disease 4. Renal failure 5. Psychiatric disease 6. Patients who refuse to participate in the study 7. Chronic back and lower back pain 8. Body mass index \<18.5 and \>40

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total morphine consumption1 dayThe total amount of morphine given by patient controlled analgesia in 24 hours will be recorded

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity score1 dayChanges in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will be recorded at postoperative 1, 6, 12, 24 hour. The NRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of patient pain. Each item is scored 0-10( 0:no pain 10: pain as bad as can be )
Postoperative nausea and vomiting1 dayChanges in Numeric Rank Score will be recorded at postoperative 1, 6, 12, 24 hour. Numeric rank score 0-3(0: no nausea and vomiting; 1:have nausea, no vomiting; 2:once vomiting attack; 3: have two or more vomiting attacks)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026