Skip to content

Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Choice in Opioid Use Disorder

Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Choice in Opioid Use Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03958474
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-05-22
Start date
2019-08-16
Completion date
2025-07-10
Last updated
2026-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid Use Disorder

Brief summary

The objective of this protocol is to use probabilistic reinforcement learning choice tasks and magnetic resonance neuroimaging to demonstrate the impact of problematic opioid use and opioid withdrawal on dynamic decision-making and reveal the neurobehavioral and neurobiological processes underlying abnormal task performance. A second objective is to identify an appropriate dose of intravenous remifentanil for subsequent studies in physically dependent individuals with opioid use disorder.

Interventions

DRUGOxycodone

Participants receive oxycodone or placebo.

Sponsors

Joshua A. Lile, Ph.D.
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind

Intervention model description

Within-subjects design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must meet moderate/severe criteria for moderate/severe opioid use disorder, report recent prescription or illicit opioid use, and be opioid dependent, as evidenced by either a urine sample positive for recent opioid use or being in frank withdrawal during screening. * Female subjects must be using an effective form of birth control (e.g., birth control pills, surgical sterilization, IUD, cervical cap with a spermicide, or abstinence). * Able to speak and read English * Subjects who are interested in completing the remifentanil dose-ranging session must report a history of intravenous opioid use and a baseline O2 saturation of 95% or greater.

Exclusion criteria

* History of, or current, clinically significant physical disease (e.g., respiratory disease \[asthma, COPD, sleep apnea\], impaired cardiovascular functioning, seizure disorder or CNS tumors) or current or past history of psychiatric disorder that would limit compliance in the studies, other than substance use disorder. * Meet diagnostic criteria for psychoactive substance use disorder for substances other than opioids (OUD subjects only) or nicotine that would require detoxification (i.e., alcohol, benzodiazepines or barbiturates). * Contraindications for MRI scanning (e.g., pacemaker, metal implants, claustrophobia, or any other implanted medical device). * Vision or hearing problems that would preclude completion of experimental tasks. * At risk for respiratory complications and have predictors of difficult bag mask ventilation (e.g., dentures, very full beard), in case emergency respiratory intervention is needed. * Seeking treatment for SUD. * Poor venous access (only subjects who will participate in the remifentanil dose-ranging session).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probabilistic Money vs Money Choice TaskSubjects complete the task twice; once under opioid maintained and once under opioid withdrawn conditions during a 16-day inpatient participation. The task takes approximately 20 minutes to complete each time.Subjects completed a 300-trial probabilistic concurrent monetary choice task, also known as an n-bandit task (here, n=2 choice options, with unsigned probability reversals every 50 trials). In each trial, subjects chose between two options signaled by blue and green envelopes. When a reward was scheduled for the chosen option, subjects were notified they earned $0.25 USD; task earnings were provided upon session completion. Choice of the high probability option was more likely to be reinforced than the low probability option at a 6:1 ratio, with probabilities summing to 0.3, resulting in a low reinforcement density context. Because choosing the higher probability option is associated with a higher likelihood of receiving a monetary reinforcer, making more high probability choices is considered better performance on the task.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJOSHUA LILE, Ph.D.

University of Kentucky

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous33.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 1211 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026