Skip to content

Effect of Therapeutic Techniques on Leg Stretching in Healthy Subjects

Effect of Different Therapeutic Techniques on the Flexibility of ischiotíbial in Healthy Individuals

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03958084
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-05-21
Start date
2020-07-20
Completion date
2021-03-30
Last updated
2020-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Adult

Keywords

Lower Extremity, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Range of motion, Hamstring Muscles

Brief summary

There are physiotherapy techniques, known as lumbar mobilization, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, massage therapy, windsheets and foam roller that present good results in stretching the legs. This study aims to evaluate which of these techniques has a better result in leg stretching. It is believed that massage therapy and lumbar mobilization will provide better results.

Detailed description

A randomized clinical trial blind crossover. The aim of this study is comparing the immediate effect of five interventions on the flexibility of hamstrings in healthy individuals. Participants will be assessed pre and post intervention through the extended leg elevation test and photogrammetry. The techniques of unilateral lumbar mobilization, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, massage, ventosa therapy and foam roller will be applied on different days with a 48-hour interval between interventions. The techniques will be compared using the repeated measures ANOVA after verification of normality by the Shapiro-Wilk test, adopting the significance level of 5% and 95% confidence interval.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTStraight Leg Raise

The assessment of the flexibility of the hamstring will be realized through the test of straight leg raise (SLR). The SLR is a passive test performed unilaterally.

Sponsors

Santa Catarina Federal University
CollaboratorOTHER
Alessandro Haupenthal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 35 years of age. * No pain in the posterior thigh.

Exclusion criteria

* Volunteers who present deep venous thrombosis. * Cutaneous allergy. * Cutaneous lesion. * Posterior thigh edema. * Lower limb prosthesis. * Shoulder or wrist injuries. * Phobia of the techniques. * Scarring in the posterior region of the thigh * Have performed myofacial release or stretches during the days of intervention. * Pilates and yoga practitioners * No attend every day intervention. * Injury of hamstrings in the last year. * Previous injuries to the spine or lower limbs in the last 6 months. * Symptoms of low back pain or hip joint. * Diabetes mellitus, since people with diabetes have limited responses in the elevated leg elevation test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motion10 minutesThe study has as main variable the range of motion of the hamstrings measured in degrees, through the test of the Elevation of the Extended Leg. The amplitude reached in the pre- and post-test was recorded by means of a photogrammetry and analyzed by a free postural evaluation program that provides the researcher with calculating linear and angular measurements through spatially defined anatomical points.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactAlessandro Haupenthal, Teacher
alessandro.haupenthal@ufsc.br55(48)99028190
Backup ContactCassia Rodrigues Schuster, Student
cassiarschuster@hotmail.com55(48)996390975

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026