Skip to content

A Study to Investigate Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Versus Placebo in Combination With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Participants With Localized Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Versus Placebo in Combination With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Localized Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03957590
Enrollment
370
Registered
2019-05-21
Start date
2019-06-11
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)

Brief summary

This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab (BGB-A317) versus placebo in combination with chemoradiotherapy in participants with localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Interventions

DRUGTislelizumab

Administered intravenously (IV)

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo to match tislelizumab administered intravenously

DRUGPaclitaxel

Administered as 135 mg/m² IV injection

DRUGCisplatin

Administered as 25 mg/m² IV injection

RADIATIONRadiotherapy

Administered at a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions

Sponsors

BeiGene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically confirmed diagnosis of localized ESCC and suitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) * Measurable and/or non-measurable disease defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 1 * Adequate organ function Key

Exclusion criteria

* Indicators of severe malnutrition * Clinically uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring frequent drainage or medical intervention within 2 weeks prior to randomization * Known to be intolerable or resistant to treatment with the protocol-specified chemotherapy * Received prior radiotherapy or therapies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1), PD-L2 or other immune-oncology therapies * Active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From randomization to the prespecified primary analysis data cut-off date of 08 January 2025; maximum time on study was 67 months.PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression, as determined by the Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization to the prespecified analysis data cut-off date of 08 January 2025; maximum time on study was 67 months.OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Oesophageal Cancer Module (OES18) Dysphagia, Reflux, Pain, and Eating ScalesBaseline and Cycle 6 and Cycle 10 (each cycle was 21 days)The EORTC-QLQ-OES18 is the specific esophageal symptoms module of the QLQ-C30. QLQ-OES18 is comprised of 18 questions grouped into 4 multi-item subscales: Dysphagia (3 items), Eating (4 items), Reflux (2 items), and Pain (3 items) and 6 single item subscales (saliva swallowing, choking, dry mouth, taste, coughing, and talking). Participants indicate the extent to which they have experienced symptoms on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores are calculated and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a higher level of symptomatology or problems.
Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL), Physical Functioning, and Fatigue ScoresBaseline and Cycle 6 and Cycle 10 (each cycle was 21 days)The EORTC QLQ-30 contains 30 questions that incorporate 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where 1 = Not at all (best) and 4 = Very Much (worst) and 2 global health quality of life (QOL) questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1 = Very poor and 7 = Excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. Higher scores in GHS and functional scales indicate better quality of life. Lower scores in symptom scales indicate better quality of life.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Tumor assessments occurred every 9 weeks for the first 54 weeks, and every 12 weeks during the next 2 years and every 24 weeks thereafter until radiographic disease progression or death; up to 67 monthsORR is defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by BIRC per RECIST v1.1. Tumor assessments were made using computed tomography (CT) scans or using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CR: Disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size (\<10 mm short axis). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters and/or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Duration of Response (DOR)Up to 67 monthsDOR is defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of relapse, as determined by the BIRC per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose of study drug to 30 days after last dose, maximum time on treatment was 57.5 monthsAn adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether considered related to study treatment or not. A TEAE is an AE that had an onset date or a worsening in severity from baseline on or after the first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days following study treatment discontinuation or initiation of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death * Was life-threatening * Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in disability/incapacity * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect * Was considered a significant medical AE by the investigator based on medical judgement.

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWeihu Wang, MD

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZefen Xiao, MD

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 32 centers in China.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tislelizumab or placebo in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT).

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
200 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
170 Participants
Age, Continuous65.0 years
Clinical Stage
Stage II
44 Participants
Clinical Stage
Stage III
96 Participants
Clinical Stage
Stage IVa
45 Participants
Clinical Stage
Stage IVb
1 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 (Fully Active)
78 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 (Ambulatory with Restricted Activity)
107 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
185 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
161 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
100 / 18593 / 185
other
Total, other adverse events
185 / 185184 / 184
serious
Total, serious adverse events
84 / 18563 / 184

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026