Skip to content

Improving Sleep Quality in Flap Patients in the SICU

Improving Sleep Quality and Satisfaction for Postoperative Plastic Surgery Flap Patients in the CUH SICU

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03957317
Enrollment
90
Registered
2019-05-21
Start date
2018-02-06
Completion date
2019-10-05
Last updated
2019-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep Deprivation

Keywords

Surgery, Postoperative sleep deprivation

Brief summary

This investigation will be a randomized interventional prospective quality improvement study. Patients undergoing plastic surgery with flap procedures (n =123) will be randomized to evaluate the effect of the implementation bundle for sleep quality improvement in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Roughly one half of the patients (n =62) will be randomized to the intervention group. This group will receive the intervention bundle which consists of providing ear plugs and eye masks to patients and their family members. Roughly one half of the patients (n =62) will be randomized to the control group. This group will receive usual care, which does not include ear plugs or eye masks and lacks specified times for laboratory draws and imaging studies. For each of the two groups, the investigators will collect Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) scores, Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores, and modified Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) scores. The investigators will administer the RCSQ to these patients following every night they spend in the SICU and the FS-ICU questionnaire immediately prior to their discharge from the ICU.

Detailed description

Patients will be identified during their presurgical clinic visit or anesthesia preoperative clinic visit for eligibility. The electronic medical record (Epic) will also be used for prescreening of potential study participants by reviewing the clinic visit daily schedule or operating room schedule. Then patient charts will be reviewed for initial data collection to determine the eligibility of potential subjects with the use of a HIPAA waiver form. A discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives will be performed. Following the discussion, informed written consent for clinical care and participation in the study will be obtained. Roughly one half of the patients (n =62) will be randomized to the intervention group. This group will receive the intervention bundle which consists of providing ear plugs and eye masks to patients and their family members. Roughly one half of the patients (n =62) will be randomized to the control group. This group will receive usual care, which does not include ear plugs or eye masks and lacks specified times for laboratory draws and imaging studies. For each of the two groups, the investigators will collect RCSQ scores, CAM-ICU scores, and modified FS-ICU scores. The investigators will administer the RCSQ to these patients following every night they spend in the SICU and the modified FS-ICU questionnaire immediately prior to their discharge from the ICU. The RCSQ is a short, 5-question, validated survey instrument for measuring sleep quality in ICU patients. The FS-ICU is a short, validated survey instrument for measuring family satisfaction with care and decision making in the ICU. The modified version is more focused on satisfaction of the patient rather than their family member(s). The CAM-ICU is a validated screening test for delirium, and scores are currently charted in the electronic medical record (EMR) as a part of routine monitoring in the SICU. The anticipated length of time for the project is 28 weeks.

Interventions

OTHEREye mask and ear plugs

Subjects receive one pair of eye mask and ear plugs during their stay in the surgical ICU.

Sponsors

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized, controlled study comparing effects of wearing eye masks and ear plugs for sensory deprivation against the standard-of-care (no treatment). Primary outcome is measuring difference between RCSQ scores (sleep quality survey).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients age ≥ 18 years * Individuals undergoing plastic surgery flap procedures requiring hourly monitoring

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Incarceration * Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea * Diagnosis of insomnia or other sleep disturbance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) scores2 days from ICU admissionThe Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) is a 5-item questionnaire used to evaluate perceived sleep depth, sleep latency, number of awakenings, efficiency, and sleep quality. Each RCSQ question is measured on a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) visual-analogue scale, with higher scores representing better sleep. The primary outcome measure is a 25% increase in median RCSQ scores from the control group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in overall modified Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey scores2 days from ICU admissionThe Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) questionnaire is a reliable and valid 34-item tool used to measure family satisfaction with care and decision-making in the ICU. Each question is completed using a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = excellent, 2 = very good, 3 = good, 4 = fair, 5 = poor, and 6 = not applicable. A modified version of the FS-ICU survey used in the present study includes 14 questions and contains only questions directed toward the patient and not family members. Overall satisfaction score is calculated as the mean of the 14 items, with lower scores indicating greater satisfaction. A secondary outcome measure is to determine the difference in overall modified FS-ICU scores between control and intervention groups.
Improvement in positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores2 days from ICU admissionThe Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) is a valid and reliable delirium monitoring instrument for ICU patients. It tests for the presence of alteration in mental status, inattention, altered level of consciousness, and disorganized thinking. The presence of both altered mental status and inattention along with either altered consciousness or disorganized thinking corresponds to a positive CAM-ICU result, and delirium is present. If these criteria are not met, then CAM-ICU is considered negative, and delirium is absent. A secondary outcome measure is to determine the difference in positive CAM-ICU results between control and intervention groups.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026