Skip to content

Long Term Safety of Cooling Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injection

Long Term Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Cooling Anesthesia for Local Anesthesia During Intravitreal Injection (COOL-2)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03956797
Acronym
COOL-2
Enrollment
80
Registered
2019-05-21
Start date
2019-04-15
Completion date
2021-04-02
Last updated
2022-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local, Diabetic Macular Edema, Diabetic Retinopathy, Intravitreal Injection, Macular Degeneration, Macular Edema

Keywords

Intravitreal Injection, Anesthesia, Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of cooling anesthesia application to the eye as anesthesia for intravitreal injection using a novel cooling anesthesia device.

Detailed description

Intravitreal injections have become the standard of care for administering medications for retinal diseases such as age related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. There is considerable apprehension among patients receiving these injections, primarily revolving around adequate anesthesia during the injection. Current methods of anesthesia involve topical anesthetic drops, lidocaine gels, or subconjunctival injections of lidocaine, which suffer from either poor anesthetic effect, corneal irritation, or subconjunctival hemorrhage, as well as significant time for the onset of anesthesia. Recens Medical has developed a novel medical device which can precisely and rapidly cool the surface of the eye This device cools to a temperature around -5 to -15 degrees Celsius, about the temperature of a cold ice cube, and thus has an excellent safety profile compared to conventional ophthalmic cryotherapy units. The value of such a device is both improved patient comfort, as well as increased efficiency and workflow for retina specialists administering intravitreal injections. This device has been extensively tested in animal safety studies as well as pilot human studies and has not demonstrated any serious adverse effects and has shown anesthetic effects comparable to current standard of care. The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of cooling anesthesia application to the eye as anesthesia for intravitreal injection using a novel cooling anesthesia device.

Interventions

DEVICERecens Cooling Anesthesia Device

Application of cooling anesthesia device prior to intravitreal injection

Sponsors

Recens Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A long term safety, dose escalation study design of differing temperatures and duration to test safety and efficacy of cooling anesthesia for intravitreal injection.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 110 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women \> 18 years old at screening visit. * Men and women who are undergoing intravitreal injections in either one eye or both eyes with either Lucentis or Eylea as part of their normal standard of care with a 30 gauge needle. * Subject has received a minimum of 3 intravitreal injections in the study eye prior to the study visit. * Subject is willing and able to sign the study written informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion criteria

* History of presence of scleromalacia * Preexisting conjunctival, episcleral or scleral defects * Less than 18 years of age * Unable to provide informed consent * Has received less than 3 injections in the study eye * Active severe eye disease not controlled with artificial tears and requiring Restasis or other prescription drugs for dry eye. * History of Endophthalmitis with intravitreal injection * History of uveitis * History of retinal detachment in either eye * History of vitrectomy * Subjects who received administration of cooling anesthesia as part of the COOL-1 study will not be excluded and are eligible to participate in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain of Intravitreal Injection: VASImmediately after injectionPain of intravitreal injection as measured by 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) (0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning the most severe pain).
Incidence of Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events30 minutes after injection% of patients that experience cooling anesthesia device-related adverse events, as assessed by anterior segment and posterior segment examination.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Movement During Intravitreal InjectionDuring injectionPhysician's evaluation of the subject's movement during the intravitreal injection procedure in response to needle penetration (0 = no movement, 1 = mild movement, 2 = marked movement).
TimeTime for entire intravitreal injection procedureRecording of the time it takes to perform intravitreal injection procedure.
Patient Anesthetic Preference24-48 hours after injectionPatient response to a questionnaire asking which method of anesthesia they prefer: standard of care or the cooling anesthesia device.
Pain of Intravitreal Injection (Follow-Up): VAS24-48 hours after injectionPain of intravitreal injection as measured by 10-point visual analog scale (0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning the most severe pain) during follow-up phone call.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 12, 2026