Skip to content

Repetitive Nerve Stimulation to Improve Recovery After Stroke

Comparison Between Mechanisms Underlying Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Performance in the Subacute and Chronic Phases After Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03956407
Acronym
RESTORES
Enrollment
51
Registered
2019-05-20
Start date
2019-12-01
Completion date
2022-11-30
Last updated
2025-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Neuromodulation, Peripheral stimulation, Motor function

Brief summary

Upper limb paresis is the most common type of post-stroke neurological impairment and a major cause of functional disability. Repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation (RPSS) is a novel strategy to improve upper limb motor performance in the post-stroke chronic phase but its effects in the subacute phase are still poorly understood. The objectives of this study are to compare the effects of RPSS on motor performance of the upper limb in the subacute and chronic phases of stroke, and to identify the mechanisms underlying this intervention.

Interventions

DEVICESuprathreshold repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation

Suprathreshold repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation will be applied to the median nerve of the affected forearm with surface electrodes. The stimulator will be set to deliver bursts of 10 Hz stimulation at 50% duty cycle (500 ms on and off). For suprathreshold stimulation, intensities will be set at the highest intensity able to induce sensory paraesthesias without overt muscle contraction or pain, and adjusted if required.

DEVICESubthreshold repetitive sensory stimulation

Subthreshold repetitive sensory stimulation will be applied to the median nerve of the affected forearm with surface electrodes. The stimulator will be set to deliver bursts of 10 Hz stimulation at 50% duty cycle (500 ms on and off). For subthreshold stimulation, intensities will be set at 10mv - 15mv lower than de lowest intensity able to induce sensory paraesthesias, and adjusted if required.

Sponsors

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An amendment for performance of a minimization procedure in order to enhance the probability of comparable characteristics between the groups was approved. The researcher responsible for minimization is not involved in data collection or analysis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, between 7 days - 3 months before enrollment (subacute phase), and at least 6 months (chronic phase). * Ability to perform at least 4 of 7 tasks performed in daily life that is part of the Jebsen-Taylor Test

Exclusion criteria

* Anesthesia of the paretic hand. * Lesions affecting the motor cortex (hand area). * Lesions affecting cerebellum, or cerebellar pathways in the brainstem. * Severe spasticity at the paretic elbow, fist or fingers, defined with a score larger than 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale. * Neurological diseases such as Parkinson disease or chronic uncontrolled chronic disease such as cancer or cardiac insufficiency. * Elbow pain or join deformity in the paretic limb. * Pregnancy. * Uncontrolled psychiatric disease. * Aphasia or severe cognitive deficit. * Inability to provide consent. * Inability to attend the experimental sessions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Jebsen-Taylor TestImmediately after one session of interventionTest of upper limb dexterity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in lateral pinch strengthImmediately after one session of interventionPinch strength measured with dynamometer
Change in gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in primary motor cortexImmediately after one session of interventionGamma-aminobutyric acid levels measured with magnetic resonance imaging spectroscopy
Change in brain perfusionImmediately after one session of interventionBrain perfusion measured with magnetic resonance imaging - arterial spin labeling
Change in grasp strengthImmediately after one session of interventionGrasp strength measured with dynamometer

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026