Skip to content

SIESTA: Sleep Intervention to Enhance Cognitive Status and Reduce Beta Amyloid

SIESTA: Sleep Intervention to Enhance Cognitive Status and Reduce Beta Amyloid

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03954210
Enrollment
200
Registered
2019-05-17
Start date
2019-08-27
Completion date
2025-04-18
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insomnia

Keywords

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, CBT-I, Alzheimer's, Alzheimer's Disease

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of a sleep intervention on improving cognitive function in older adults with symptoms of insomnia, determine the association between change in sleep measures and change in cognitive function, and examine the efficacy of the sleep intervention on reducing the rate of Aβ deposition. Participants, ages 60-85, will be randomly assigned to a six-week sleep intervention program. A sub-group of fifty participants will undergo Florbetapir-Positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging during the one-year reassessment to examine the efficacy of the sleep intervention on reducing the rate of Aβ accumulation from baseline to one-year post-intervention.

Detailed description

Lifestyle interventions to increase exercise and improve diet have been the focus of recent clinical trials to potentially prevent Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, despite the strong links between sleep disruptions, cognitive decline, and AD, sleep enhancement has yet to be targeted as a lifestyle intervention to prevent AD. Approximately fifteen percent of AD may be prevented by an efficacious intervention aimed to reduce sleep disturbances and sleep disorders. Chronic insomnia is the most frequent sleep disorder occurring in at least forty percent of older adults. Individuals with insomnia are more likely to be diagnosed with AD and demonstrate a decline in cognitive function at long-term follow-up. AD is characterized by the accumulation of Aβ plaques and tau tangles in the brain, and growing evidence shows impaired sleep contributes to the accumulation of Aβ. An intervention aimed at improving insomnia may represent a critical opportunity for primary prevention to slow cognitive decline and potentially delay the onset of AD. Therefore, the long-term goal of this research agenda is to understand how addressing sleep disturbances, via sleep intervention, may delay the onset of AD.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I)

CBT-I is an in-person, one-on-one program with a graduate psychology research assistant who is trained in providing a standardized CBT-I. Participants will maintain a sleep diary during the course of the program to aid in tailoring the program. Each session will begin with a summary and graphing of sleep diary data and will include an assessment of treatment gains and adherence.

Participants in the sleep and lifestyle education group will attend six weekly, in-person, one-on-one, stretching, and thinking activity sessions with a graduate research assistant to control for socialization and contact with research personnel.

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

The research assistant will be blinded to the participant's intervention group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Report of difficulty falling asleep, maintaining sleep, or waking up too early at least three nights a week for the past six months * A score of greater than, or equal to, ten on the Insomnia Severity Index * A score of greater than, or equal to, twenty-five on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) * A score of less than, or equal to, two on the Dementia Screening Interview (AD8)

Exclusion criteria

* A known untreated sleep disorder (i.e., sleep apnea or restless leg syndrome) * Currently taking benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepines, melatonin supplements, or agonists for insomnia * A score of greater than, or equal to, fifteen on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) indicating severe depression or endorsement of any suicidal ideation (an answer of one, two, or three on item number nine of the PHQ-9) * History of drug or alcohol abuse as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-4) criteria within the last two years * History of a nervous system disorder (i.e., stroke, Parkinson's Disease) * Severe mental illness (i.e., Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder) * History of a learning disability or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder * Current, or history of, shift work * Currently receiving CBT-I treatment * Unable to hear at a conversational level * Failure of a near vision test utilizing the Logarithmic Near Visual Acuity Chart

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Continuous Performance Test (CPT)6-Week ReassessmentAssessment of the participants attention. Participants will be given a set of rules for stimuli, and based on those rules they will determine if a presented stimuli fit within those rules. Scores will be determined by the number of correctly identified stimuli. Hit Reaction Time (HRT) is reported as a T-score (M = 50, SD = 10), where higher scores indicate slower reaction time and worse performance.
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)6-Week ReassessmentCognitive function will be assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The RBANS consists of 12 subtests assessing immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional abilities, language, attention, and delayed memory. The RBANS Total Scale Score is reported as a Standard Score with a normative mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Possible scores range from 40 to 160. Higher scores indicate better overall cognitive performance.
Stroop Test6-Week ReassessmentAssessment of participants executive functioning. Participants will be required to inhibit their natural response and replace it with a different response (i.e., reading a word versus saying the color of the word). Scores are obtained by taking the difference between conditions and normalizing for the number of stimuli. Stroop Interference outcomes were reported as T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10), with higher scores reflecting greater interference and worse executive function.
Neuropsychological Assessment Battery-Digits Forward/Digits Backward Test6-Week ReassessmentParticipants are asked to recall strings of numbers in order (Forward) and in reverse order (Backward). The outcome is the longest string of numbers correctly recalled in each direction. Scores are reported as Standard Scores (M = 10, SD = 3), with possible scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores indicate better auditory attention, immediate memory (Forward), and working memory/executive function (Backward).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Polysomnography6-Week ReassessmentSleep measures were evaluated using one overnight polysomnography (PSG). Standardized protocols were used to prepare the participants and place six electroencephalogram sensors to detect brain wave activity. Total sleep time (TST), time in bed (TIB), wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep onset latency (SOL), sleep stages 1 (N1), 2 (N2), and 3 (N3), and rapid eye movement sleep (REM) were determined using standardized scoring procedures.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCatherine Siengsukon, PT, PhD

University of Kansas Medical Center

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All study assessments took place at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) from August 2019 to April 2025.

Pre-assignment details

Everyone who was enrolled in study was randomized into CBT-I or active control.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
72 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants
Age, Continuous69.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
94 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
174 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
200 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
158 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1000 / 100
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1001 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1000 / 100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026