Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Phenylephrine Response During Refractory Septic Shock

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Evaluating the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Phenylephrine Response During Refractory Septic Shock

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03953677
Acronym
Adress-Pilot
Enrollment
32
Registered
2019-05-16
Start date
2019-10-27
Completion date
2023-03-22
Last updated
2026-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock, Vasopressor Resistance

Brief summary

Septic shock is common in patients admitted to intensive care and hospital mortality occurs in close to 50% of these patients. In half of the cases, death occurs within the first 72 hours in a context of multiple organ failure that does not respond to conventional therapies, particularly circulatory therapies, despite increasing doses of catecholamines. Vasopressor resistance in septic patients defines refractory septic shock. In one study (Conrad et al. 2015), the increase in blood pressure observed with an infusion of increasing doses of phenylephrine (dose-response curve) made it possible to quickly and clearly identify patients resistant to vasopressors at a high risk of death by refractory shock (ROC AUC 0.92). This resistance is due in particular to a downregulation of α1 adrenergic receptors, linked to sympathetic hyper activation associated with septic shock. To date, there is no validated therapy in this situation. However, experimental data have shown that the administration of α2 agonists, usually used for their sedative (dexmedetomidine) or anti-hypertensive (clonidine) effect, normalizes sympathetic activity towards basal values. In animals, α2 agonists restore the sensitivity of alpha1 adrenergic receptors, resulting in improved vasopressor sensitivity and survival. In humans, a beneficial effect on mortality was suggested in the first trial testing dexmedetomidine in septic patients in 2017. This effect was observed especially in the most severe patients, suggesting a restoration of sensitivity to vasopressors. The hypothesis is that the administration of dexmedetomidine in patients in refractory septic shock may improve response to phenylephrine and decrease resistance to vasopressors. This pilot study could lay the foundation for a randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine 100 Mcg/mL Intravenous Solution

Continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.7 µg/kg/h for 2 hours and then 1 µg/kg/h at fixed dose

DRUG5% glucose Infusion solution

Continuous infusion of placebo (5% glucose) at 0.7 µg/kg/h for 2 hours and then 1 µg/kg/h at fixed dose

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old * Septic shock, defined by the "Sepsis-3" criteria * proven or suspected infection, with modification of the SOFA score ≥ 2 points, * with persistent hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg * and a serum lactate level \> 2 mmol/L despite adequate vascular filling * Adequate vascular filling: ≥ 30ml/kg, OR absence of preload-dependency criteria at time of assessment (respiratory variability of the inferior vena cava, passive leg lift, pulsed pressure variation) * Catecholamine resistance, defined by the need for a dose of norepinephrine ≥ 0,5 µg/kg/min for more than 2 consecutive hours within 24 hours of admission to intensive care unit * persistence of circulatory failure with at least one of the following criteria present in the 2 hours prior to randomisation: hyperlactatemia \> 2mmol/l, and/or mottling (≥ 1 score), and/or oliguria (diuresis \< 0,5 ml/kg/h over the last 2 hours) * Invasive Mechanical ventilation * Under sedation by midazolam or propofol * Informed consent obtained from a relative for patient included in an emergency * Patient affiliated to the national health insurance system

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiac arrest before inclusion and occurring before septic shock criteria are met * Cardiac index \< 2.2 l/min/m² after volume correction, or left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40% on echocardiography * Bradycardia \< 55 bpm (apart from treatment with β-blocker) or 2nd or 3rd degree BAV not equipped * Proven or suspected decompensation of coronary heart disease * Acute cerebrovascular condition within 2 weeks prior to inclusion * Severe hepatic insufficiency with TP and factor V \<50% in the absence of DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) * Patient on adrenaline or vasopressors at the time of inclusion (epinephrine or vasopressin stopped prior to inclusion is not a criterion for non-inclusion) * Patient on non-selective MAOI iproniazid within 15 days of inclusion * Patient for whom a decision has been made to limit the use of therapies * Hypersensitivity to dexmedetomidine or phenylephrine * Patient on dexmedetomidine before inclusion * Person subject to a legal protection measure (curatorship, guardianship) * Person subject to limited judicial protection * Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman * Patient with suspected or confirmed mesenteric ischemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative change in mean blood pressure, expressed as a percentage6 hours after the end of the initial testRelative variation in mean blood pressure between the basal value at the beginning of the test and the value reached at the dose of 6 µg/kg/min (%PAM0 = PAMd/PAM0 x100)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026