Skip to content

Sort Out XI - Combo Stent Versus BioMatrix Alpha Stent

Randomized Clinical Comparison of the Combined Sirolimus Eluting and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Combo™ Stent and the Biolimus Eluting Absorbable Polymer Coated BioMatrix Alpha™ Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03952273
Acronym
SORTOUTXI
Enrollment
3141
Registered
2019-05-16
Start date
2019-08-14
Completion date
2030-11-30
Last updated
2023-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Drug eluting stent, Stent

Brief summary

SORT OUT XI Comparison of Combo™ stent and BioMatrix Alpha™ stent in the treatment of unselected patients with ischemic heart disease.

Detailed description

Randomized clinical comparison of the Sirolimus eluting and endothelial progenitor cell Combo™ stent and the Biolimus eluting absorbable polymer coated BioMatrix Alpha™ stent in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTPCI with BioMatrix Alpha™ stent

Randomozation between either Sirolimus eluting and endothelial progenitor cell Combo™ stent or Biolimus eluting absorbable polymer coated BioMatrix Alpha™ stent

COMBINATION_PRODUCTPCI with Combo™ stent

Randomozation between either Sirolimus eluting and endothelial progenitor cell Combo™ stent or Biolimus eluting absorbable polymer coated BioMatrix Alpha™ stent

Sponsors

Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Odense University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
OrbusNeich
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Biosensors International
CollaboratorOTHER
Phillip Freeman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All patients aged ≥18 years who are eligible for treatment with one or several drug-eluting coronary stents at one of the three heart centers in Aarhus, Odense and Aalborg can be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years * The patient does not wish to participate * The patient is not able to consent to randomization (eg. intubated patients) * The patient do not speak Danish * The patient is already included in the SORT OUT XI study * Life expectancy \<1 year * Allergic to study related treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device-related Target Lesion Failure (TLF) The composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularizationWithin 12 monthsThe primary endpoint will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios between groups will be calculated using a Cox proportional hazard model and the primary endpoint in the two per protocol treated groups will be compared with an upper one-sided 95% confidence interval. Patients treated with the ComboTM stent will be used as the reference group.
Target Lesion Revascularisation (TLR)Within 12 monthsRepeat/new revascularization (PCI or CABG) within the stent or within a 5-mm border proximal or distal to the stent. (Angina, CCS \> 1 related to the index lesion/vessel and diameter stenosis ≥ 50%. Diameter stenosis will be assessed by eyeballing, FFR \<0.80, or iFR\< 0.90). TLR will be clinically driven.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with Myocardial InfarctionThrough 5 yearsThe acute MI diagnosis follows The Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force on Third Universal Definition of MI (23), which has been adapted by Academy Research Consortium (22). In cases of updates of the definition of MI, the latest definition will be used.
Target Lesion Revascularization due to clincal symptomsThrough 5 yearsAngina, CCS \> 1 related to the index lesion/vessel and diameter stenosis ≥ 50%. Diameter stenosis will be assessed by eyeballing, FFR \<0.80, or iFR\< 0.90.
Number of patients with all cause mortalityThrough 5 yearsCardiac and non-cardiac
Individual components of the primary end point comprise the secondary end pointsClinical follow-up will be continued through 5 yearscardiac death; MI; clinically indicated TLR; all death (cardiac and noncardiac) and target vessel revascularisation (TVR); definite, probable, possible, and overall stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium definition (22); and a patient-related composite end point (all death, all MI (including procedure related MI), or any revascularization). For continuous variables, the difference between the treatment groups will be evaluated using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. For discrete variables, the differences will be given as numbers and in percentages and will be analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Two-sided test will be used, and a pvalue of 0.05 considered significant.
Number of patients with stent thrombosisThrough 5 yearsDefinite, probable, possible and overall according to the Academic Research Consortium definition (22)
Number of patients with Patient-related composite end pointThrough 5 yearsAll death, all MI (including procedure related MI) or any revascularisation
Target Vessel Revascularization due to clincal symptomsThrough 5 yearsAngina, CCS \> 1 related to the index lesion/vessel and diameter stenosis ≥ 50%. Diameter stenosis will be assessed by eyeballing, FFR \<0.80, or iFR\< 0.90.
Number of participants with Cardiac DeathThrough 5 years

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026