Skip to content

Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Injections in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder

Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Injections in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03951896
Enrollment
32
Registered
2019-05-16
Start date
2014-05-03
Completion date
2015-09-04
Last updated
2019-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis, Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder, Frozen Shoulder

Brief summary

This study was done to investigate whether platelet rich plasma(PRP) injections are effective in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder(AC).Patients were randomized to 2 groups, and one group took PRP injections for 3 times every two weeks, while the other group took saline injections in same frequency and volume. A standardized exercise programme was also applied to all patients. Patients were then evaluated with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index(SPADI), Visual analogous scales for pain and disability, Ranges of Movements and use of analgesics in before, after and 3rd month of the therapy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPRP

A venous blood sample of 8.5 ml were obtained from all patients. For the treatment group, the blood samples were treated with 1.5 ml ACD-A or sodium citrate to achieve anticoagulation. The blood was then centrifugated for 5 minutes with RCF 1200 G velocity to clump red blood cells, and then centrifugated for 10 minutes in same velocity to obtain platelet concentrate. 2 ml's of the resulting platelet rich plasma was injected to the shoulder of the subjects.All of the injections were done every two weeks, for a total of 3 times using 21 G injection needles with injection technique of posterior approach.

OTHERSaline injection

2 ml's of NaCl solution with 0,9% concentration was applied to the shoulders of the participants.

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The injection process was made with injectors coated with opaque adhesive tapes, and were prepared by another researcher who wasn't involved in injection or assessment. The statistical analyses were conducted without knowing the content of the groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being over 18 years old and having a shoulder pain with restriction for 3 months at least, and 9 months at most(Pain VAS being \>40 mm, and loss of ROM for affected side more than %25 of unaffected side).

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects were excluded if they had uncontrolled diabetes, active inflammatory diseases, ongoing pregnancy, severe anemia, psychiatric diseases that may affect compliance or cancer. Patients who had a history of trauma, recent injection therapies(\<3 months), surgery or allergy to local anaesthetics, or signs of complex regional pain syndrome, local infections or use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs throughout the study were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)3 monthsShoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a tool to assess pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain, which was extensively used in studies involving AC of the shoulder6, 15, 16. It consists of 5 questions in pain domain, and 8 questions in disability domain, which were expressed in a visual analogous scale.
Visual Analogous Scales for pain3 monthsPatients were asked to describe their pain, level of disability or treatment satisfaction on a 10 cm long line, with 0 point being none, and 10 cm point being highest possible. The proximity of the marked point to the 0 end was measured, and the results were recorded

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogous Scales for disability3 monthsPatients were asked to describe their pain, level of disability or treatment satisfaction on a 10 cm long line, with 0 point being none, and 10 cm point being highest possible. The proximity of the marked point to the 0 end was measured, and the results were recorded
Shoulder ranges of motions3 monthsShoulder range of motions were also evaluated at the time points that were mentioned, as secondary outcome measures. All of the measurements were done accordingly to the guidelines of American College of Orthopedic Surgeons by a conventional goniometer18, 19. The researcher who obtained the measurements was an experienced therapist in this field, and was blind to the treatment groups.
Analgesic use3 monthsSubjects were also asked about their needs of analgesic usage, namely acetaminophen. They were asked to write down each time they took an acetaminophen tablet of 500 mgs. The results were recorded as miligrams.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026