Skip to content

Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Phase 2, Multicenter, Double-blind (Sponsor-unblinded), Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03951077
Enrollment
118
Registered
2019-05-15
Start date
2019-08-12
Completion date
2021-02-10
Last updated
2022-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Keywords

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Hormone, Elagolix

Brief summary

This study will assess the potential impact of elagolix on disordered pituitary and ovarian hormones in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Detailed description

This is a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind (sponsor-unblinded), randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of elagolix in women with PCOS. PCOS is one of the most common hormonal disorders in women of reproductive age, yet few treatment options are available. This study will help determine if elagolix can impact disordered hormonal dynamics in women with PCOS and at what dosage.

Interventions

DRUGElagolix

Capsule administered orally

DRUGPlacebo

Capsule administered orally

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with clinical diagnosis of PCOS. * Participants with a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 to 38 kg/m\^2 at time of Screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with newly diagnosed medical condition requiring intervention that has not been stabilized at least 30 days prior to Baseline. * Participants with a significant medical condition that require intervention during the course of study participation (such as anticipated major elective surgery). * Participants with an unstable medical condition (including, but not limited to, uncontrolled hypertension, epilepsy requiring anti-epileptic medicine, unstable angina, confirmed inflammatory bowel disease, hyperprolactinemia, clinically significant infection or injury).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Menstrual Cycle RespondersWeek 0 (Baseline) to Week 24 (Month 6)A participant was considered a menstrual cycle responder if she has at least 2 normal menstrual cycles during the final 4 months of the treatment period. In addition, a participant was considered a complete menstrual cycle responder if she has normal menstrual cycles beginning at or before Month 3 that are maintained through Month 6 during the treatment period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1: before the morning dose (0 hour) and at 0.5 (± 5 minutes), 1 (± 5 minutes), 1.5 (± 5 minutes), 2 (± 15 minutes), 2.5 (± 15 minutes), 3 (± 15 minutes), 3.5 (± 15 minutes), and 4 (± 15 minutes) hours after dosing.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 2:2:2:2:2:3 to the following treatments: 25 mg twice daily (BID), 50 mg once daily (QD), 75 mg BID, 150 mg QD, 300 mg QD, or placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo taken orally BID
26
Elagolix 25 mg BID
Elagolix 25 mg taken orally BID plus placebo
18
Elagolix 50 mg QD
Elagolix 50 mg taken orally QD plus placebo
17
Elagolix 75 mg BID
Elagolix 75 mg taken orally BID plus placebo
17
Elagolix 150 mg QD
Elagolix 150 mg taken orally QD plus placebo
18
Elagolix 300 mg QD
Elagolix 300 mg taken orally QD plus placebo
18
Total114

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event100000
Overall StudyDid Not Receive Any Study Drug101110
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up112323
Overall StudyNon-Compliance With Study Procedures000010
Overall StudyOther, Not Specified121010596
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject330332

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElagolix 25 mg BIDElagolix 50 mg QDElagolix 75 mg BIDElagolix 150 mg QDElagolix 300 mg QDPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous25.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.19
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.85
26.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.27
25.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.19
26.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.35
27.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
26.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Body Mass Index (BMI)
< 30 kg/m^2
5 Participants5 Participants5 Participants5 Participants5 Participants8 Participants33 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
≥ 30 kg/m^2
13 Participants12 Participants12 Participants13 Participants13 Participants18 Participants81 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants11 Participants14 Participants14 Participants14 Participants21 Participants87 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants7 Participants4 Participants6 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants16 Participants12 Participants11 Participants14 Participants19 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants17 Participants17 Participants18 Participants18 Participants26 Participants114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 180 / 170 / 170 / 180 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 269 / 188 / 176 / 1711 / 1810 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 261 / 180 / 170 / 170 / 180 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Menstrual Cycle Responders

A participant was considered a menstrual cycle responder if she has at least 2 normal menstrual cycles during the final 4 months of the treatment period. In addition, a participant was considered a complete menstrual cycle responder if she has normal menstrual cycles beginning at or before Month 3 that are maintained through Month 6 during the treatment period.

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline) to Week 24 (Month 6)

Population: Full Analysis Set: all randomly assigned participants who have received at least one dose of study drug in this study. Based on observed cases only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Menstrual Cycle Responders7.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 25 mg BIDPercentage of Menstrual Cycle Responders0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 50 mg QDPercentage of Menstrual Cycle Responders0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Menstrual Cycle Responders0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Menstrual Cycle Responders0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 300 mg QDPercentage of Menstrual Cycle Responders5.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Across the strata, 90% confidence interval (CI) for adjusted difference and p-value were calculated according to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for strata (Baseline FG score \[\< 8, ≥ 8\], and baseline normal/obese status \[BMI \< 30, ≥ 30\]) for the comparison of between each elagolix group and placebo. If zero frequency occurred, the zero count was replaced by 0.1 to prevent dividing by zero.p-value: 0.390% CI: [-15.38, 3.49]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Across the strata, 90% CI for adjusted difference and p-value were calculated according to the CMH test adjusted for strata (Baseline FG score \[\< 8, ≥ 8\], and baseline normal/obese status \[BMI \< 30, ≥ 30\]) for the comparison of between each elagolix group and placebo. If zero frequency occurred, the zero count was replaced by 0.1 to prevent dividing by zero.p-value: 0.3290% CI: [-15.65, 3.86]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Across the strata, 90% CI for adjusted difference and p-value were calculated according to the CMH test adjusted for strata (Baseline FG score \[\< 8, ≥ 8\], and baseline normal/obese status \[BMI \< 30, ≥ 30\]) for the comparison of between each elagolix group and placebo. If zero frequency occurred, the zero count was replaced by 0.1 to prevent dividing by zero.p-value: 0.31590% CI: [-14.87, 3.59]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Across the strata, 90% CI for adjusted difference and p-value were calculated according to the CMH test adjusted for strata (Baseline FG score \[\< 8, ≥ 8\], and baseline normal/obese status \[BMI \< 30, ≥ 30\]) for the comparison of between each elagolix group and placebo. If zero frequency occurred, the zero count was replaced by 0.1 to prevent dividing by zero.p-value: 0.26590% CI: [-16.63, 3.19]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Across the strata, 90% CI for adjusted difference and p-value were calculated according to the CMH test adjusted for strata (Baseline FG score \[\< 8, ≥ 8\], and baseline normal/obese status \[BMI \< 30, ≥ 30\]) for the comparison of between each elagolix group and placebo. If zero frequency occurred, the zero count was replaced by 0.1 to prevent dividing by zero.p-value: 0.91490% CI: [-13.1, 11.48]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1: before the morning dose (0 hour) and at 0.5 (± 5 minutes), 1 (± 5 minutes), 1.5 (± 5 minutes), 2 (± 15 minutes), 2.5 (± 15 minutes), 3 (± 15 minutes), 3.5 (± 15 minutes), and 4 (± 15 minutes) hours after dosing.

Population: Full Analysis Set: all randomly assigned participants who have received at least one dose of study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1-1.82 (IU/L)*hrStandard Error 2.292
Elagolix 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1-7.75 (IU/L)*hrStandard Error 2.867
Elagolix 50 mg QDChange From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1-10.65 (IU/L)*hrStandard Error 2.861
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1-17.92 (IU/L)*hrStandard Error 2.692
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1-7.97 (IU/L)*hrStandard Error 3.112
Elagolix 300 mg QDChange From Baseline in Area Under the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) at Week 1-13.54 (IU/L)*hrStandard Error 2.763
Comparison: P-value is from mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline FG score (\< 8, ≥ 8), and baseline normal/obese status (BMI \< 30, ≥ 30), participant as a random effect, and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline measurement. Model is based on unstructured variance covariance structure.p-value: 0.08790% CI: [-11.628, -0.231]MMRM
Comparison: P-value is from MMRM with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline FG score (\< 8, ≥ 8), and baseline normal/obese status (BMI \< 30, ≥ 30), participant as a random effect, and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline measurement. Model is based on unstructured variance covariance structure.p-value: 0.01290% CI: [-14.533, -3.118]MMRM
Comparison: P-value is from MMRM with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline FG score (\< 8, ≥ 8), and baseline normal/obese status (BMI \< 30, ≥ 30), participant as a random effect, and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline measurement. Model is based on unstructured variance covariance structure.p-value: <0.00190% CI: [-21.673, -10.519]MMRM
Comparison: P-value is from MMRM with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline FG score (\< 8, ≥ 8), and baseline normal/obese status (BMI \< 30, ≥ 30), participant as a random effect, and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline measurement. Model is based on unstructured variance covariance structure.p-value: 0.09190% CI: [-12.116, -0.176]MMRM
Comparison: P-value is from MMRM with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline FG score (\< 8, ≥ 8), and baseline normal/obese status (BMI \< 30, ≥ 30), participant as a random effect, and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline measurement. Model is based on unstructured variance covariance structure.p-value: <0.00190% CI: [-17.418, -6.016]MMRM

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026