Skip to content

Improvement of Knowledge About the Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in the Aftermath of Knee Trauma.

Contribution of Functional Brain MRI to the Understanding of Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition (AMI) in the Aftermath of Knee Trauma.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03950024
Acronym
CAMIK
Enrollment
42
Registered
2019-05-14
Start date
2019-10-29
Completion date
2024-06-11
Last updated
2024-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Keywords

arthrogenic muscle inhibition, anterior cruciate ligament, functional brain MRI, Central nervous system, Knee trauma

Brief summary

Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition (AMI) is one of the classic complications occurring in the aftermath of knee trauma; AMI is grossly defined as a lack of extension due to quadriceps inhibition and hamstring contracture. However, its origins remains unknown with a strong suspicion for a central brain origin. It could be the missing link explaining this lack of extension following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. The primary hypothesis of this study is that a difference in activation of motor brain areas exists in patients with an ACL rupture, between those with AMI or without. The second hypothesis is that this difference could be seen on brain functional MRI.

Detailed description

AMI leads to quadriceps atrophy, persistent knee pain, dynamic instability, and a higher rate of osteoarthritis. A recent literature review suggests that the AMI phenomenon is multifactorial, but not widely known and poorly understood. Known mechanisms include impaired motor function at rest, impaired transmission of information from joint sensory receptors, impaired excitability of the spinal reflex and impaired cortical activity. Several studies have suggested a link between ACL rupture and central nervous system reorganization. Among the neurophysiological investigations explored are the evoked somesthesic potentials, electroencephalography, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, these mechanisms alone do not explain the phenomenon in its entirety, suggesting that there are other mechanisms. Furthermore, no study has used functional brain MRI to assess the existence of similar changes in AMI. This study plans to compare two groups of patients with an ACL rupture: a group with AMI, and a group without AMI. Both groups will undergo a functional brain MRI in order to analyse any modification of the sensory-motor network connectivity that could occur.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTfunctional brain MRI

The functional brain MRI realized will be a examination with a resting sequence and a sequence during a movement imagination task. (knee bent)

Sponsors

University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective, monocentric, interventional, comparative, controlled, non-randomized study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male patient, right-handed, * with a severe right knee sprain in the event of ACL rupture, * occurrence of trauma within 4 weeks prior to inclusion, * with a score of ≥ 8/10 on the Edinburgh Manual Laterality Questionnaire, -affiliated or benefiting from public health services.

Exclusion criteria

* person presenting any of these conditions : professional player / athlete, -contraindication to the MRI examination (claustrophobic patient, patient with a metallic element), * patient already operated on with ligament damage to the knee other than ACL, * patient with iterative ACL rupture, * patient who has undergone contralateral ligament reconstruction, * patient with multi-ligamentary knee injury, * patient refusing to be informed of any abnormality detected on brain MRI, -protected patient (adults under guardianship or other legal protection, deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Matrix of correlation coefficientsDay 0A matrix of correlation coefficients, measured by MRI, representing the strength of the sensory-motor network connectivity at rest for each group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activation map of the motor representations of knee movementDay 0An activation map of the motor representations of knee movement are measured by MRI

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026