Skip to content

Evaluating Optimal Timing of Endocrine Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Early-stage Breast Cancer (REaCT-RETT)

A Pragmatic Randomised, Multicentre Trial Evaluating Optimal Timing of Endocrine Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Early-stage Breast Cancer (REaCT-RETT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03948568
Acronym
REaCT-RETT
Enrollment
262
Registered
2019-05-14
Start date
2019-09-17
Completion date
2022-04-09
Last updated
2022-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early-stage Breast Cancer

Keywords

Radiation Therapy, Endocrine Therapy

Brief summary

REaCT-RETT will demonstrate the non-inferiority of concurrent compared to sequential endocrine therapy in patients receiving post-operative radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer.

Detailed description

Clinical equipoise exists around the optimal time to start adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients who will receive post-operative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Patients receive either concurrent or sequential endocrine and radiation therapy, where concurrent therapy consists of endocrine therapy started before, with or during radiotherapy, while sequential treatment is defined as endocrine therapy starting after the completion of radiotherapy. A recent survey of Canadian oncologists showed that the main reason for prescribing sequential endocrine therapy was a concern that concurrent endocrine therapy and radiotherapy would worsen the toxicity of endocrine treatment. This is despite the absence of any clinical trial evidence to support this. Indeed, a recent systematic review by our group was unable to confirm or refute whether increased toxicities, related to the timing of endocrine therapy and radiotherapy actually exist in clinical practice. The investigators are therefore proposing a pragmatic randomised trial to assess whether or not concurrent endocrine therapy and radiotherapy worsens endocrine treatment-related symptoms in an era of modern endocrine and radiation therapy.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTEndocrine Therapy and Radiotherapy

Endocrine therapy and radiotherapy administered either concurrently or sequentially

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with newly diagnosed early stage, hormone receptor positive breast cancer * Planned to receive both endocrine therapy and post-operative radiotherapy * Able to provide verbal consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous endocrine therapy for invasive breast cancer * Previous radiotherapy for breast cancer in the same breast

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endocrine toxicity12 months (+/- 2 weeks) post final fraction of radiotherapyTo measure endocrine toxicity. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Sub-scale (FACT-ES) is a questionnaire specific to patients with endocrine symptoms and measures the side effects and putative benefits of hormonal treatments given (endocrine therapy) in breast cancer. The FACT-ES questionnaire is comprised of 5 sections; physical well-being (7 questions), social/family well-being (7 questions), emotional well-being (6 questions), functional well-being (7 questions) and additional concerns (19 questions). A total of 46 questions are asked that all contain an answer on a scale range of 0-4, with 0 representing the answer 'not at all' and 4 representing the answer 'very much'. Of the 46 questions asked 31/46 have 'very much' representing the worst answer and the remaining 15/46 have 'very much' representing the best answer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiotherapy toxicity12 months (+/- 2 weeks) post final fraction of radiotherapyTo evaluate the acute and early-moderate late toxicities of radiotherapy in terms of skin toxicity, pneumonitis, and breast pain. This will be recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0, with breast cosmesis recorded as per the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) cosmetic rating system for breast cancer. These standardized criteria have been used in a recent Canadian breast radiation randomized trial, RAPID, and the investigators will use a similar template to record any radiation toxicities at different points of time.
Rates of starting endocrine therapy and compliance12 months (+/- 2 weeks) post final fraction of radiotherapyRates of starting endocrine therapy, compliance rates, discontinuation rates, along with the reasons for discontinuation.
Direct Estimation of Health Utility Values12 months (+/- 2 weeks) post final fraction of radiotherapyTo measure the patient quality of life using the validated FACT-B questionnaire. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Breast Cancer (FACT-B) is a questionnaire that measures multidimensional quality of life in patients with breast cancer. The FACT-B questionnaire is comprised of 5 sections; physical well-being (7 questions), social/family well-being (7 questions), emotional well-being (6 questions), functional well-being (7 questions) and additional concerns (10 questions). A total of 37 questions are asked that all contain an answer on a scale range of 0-4, with 0 representing the answer 'not at all' and 4 representing the answer 'very much'. Of the 46 questions asked 20/37 have 'very much' representing the worst answer and the remaining 17/37 have 'very much' representing the best answer.
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios12 months (+/- 2 weeks) post final fraction of radiotherapyIncremental cost-effectiveness ratios (cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and cost per one endocrine toxicity case averted) will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire consists of two sections; the descriptive system and the visual analogue scale. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and has 5 levels associated with it (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). The scale range of 1-5 is used for the 5 dimensions where 1 is the best outcome and 5 is the worst outcome. The Visual Analogue scale records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual scale with endpoints labelled the best health you can imagine at the top and the worst health you can imagine at the bottom. This ranges 0-100 with 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome.
Exploratory analyses on evaluating radiotherapy toxicity12 months (+/- 2 weeks) post final fraction of radiotherapyExploratory analyses will be performed evaluating toxicity in patients receiving different types of radiotherapy (i.e. local versus regional radiotherapy). This will be evaluated using data collected on breast volume, seroma size, dose heterogeneity and the time of stimulation and planning.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026