Skip to content

Effects of Oral Levosimendan on Respiratory Function in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): Open-Label Extension

Effects of Oral Levosimendan (ODM-109) on Respiratory Function in Patients With ALS: Open-Label Extension for Patients Completing Study 3119002

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03948178
Acronym
REFALS-ES
Enrollment
227
Registered
2019-05-13
Start date
2019-06-26
Completion date
2020-11-18
Last updated
2023-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Brief summary

This study provides an opportunity for subjects in the REFALS (3119002; NCT03505021) study to continue treatment with oral levosimendan. The study will also provide more information about long-term safety and effectiveness of oral levosimendan in patients with ALS. This is an open-label study, so that all eligible subjects that complete the double-blind REFALS study (48-weeks of treatment) will have the opportunity to receive oral levosimendan treatment. The primary objective, in addition to continuing treatment for subjects enrolled in the REFALS study, is to evaluate long-term safety of oral levosimendan in ALS patients. Another important objective is to explore long-term effectiveness of oral levosimendan in the treatment of patients with ALS. This study is open only to patients taking part in the REFALS study.

Interventions

DRUGLevosimendan

Levosimendan 1 mg capsule for oral administration

Sponsors

Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written or verbal informed consent (IC) for participation in the study * Subjects who completed 48 weeks of treatment according to the REFALS study protocol * Able to swallow study treatment capsules at the time of completing 48 weeks dosing in the REFALS study

Exclusion criteria

* Development (or significant worsening from baseline of the REFALS study) of serious cardiovascular disease (e.g.: myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia, stroke, or second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block) * Pulse/heart rate repeatedly \>100 bpm after 5-minute rest at baseline. If the pulse/heart rate is \>100 bpm in the first recording, then a second recording must be done after another 5 min rest to confirm pulse/heart rate \>100 bpm * Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg * Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance \< 30ml/min or creatine \>170 µmol/l at 48 week visit of the REFALS study, or on dialysis * Severe hepatic impairment at the discretion of the investigator * Women of reproductive age without a negative pregnancy test and without a commitment to using a highly effective method of contraception (e.g.: oral hormonal contraceptive associated with inhibition of ovulation, intrauterine devices and long acting progestin agent), if sexually active during the study, and for 1 month after the last dose of the study treatment. Women who are postmenopausal (1 year since last menstrual cycle), surgically sterilised or who have undergone a hysterectomy are considered not to be reproductive and can be included * Subject judged to be actively suicidal by the investigator * Any other clinical significant cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological or psychiatric disorder or any other major concurrent illness that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the interpretation of the study results or constitute a health risk for the subject if he/she took part in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Events RecordingFrom signing informed consent until 14-25 days after the last study treatment for all patients, an average of 23.5 weeks.Adverse Events as subject counts and proportions (%) of subject per Adverse Event
Pulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in pulse and heart rate(from ECG recording) from Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6 (pulse rate only), Month 3, Month 6, end of study (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)Actual values and changes from baseline in supine pre-dose pulse/heart rate were summarised using descriptive statistics .
12-lead Electrocardiogram AssessmentsBaseline, week 2, week 4, month 3, month 6, end-of-study(subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)Summarisation of any abnormal 12-lead ECG findings using descriptive statistics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Respiratory Support DeviceTime to event at study completion (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)Time to respiratory device support (non invasive) or death
Borg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Baseline through study completion (week 2, week 4, month 3, month 6, end of study (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)Patients rated their perception of the severity of their dyspnea using the Borg Category Ration 10 scale (CR 10). The scale ranges from 0(no dysponea) to 10 (maximal dyspnea). each category is numbered and most but not all have verbal cues. At each assessment the patient scored the category they felt best described their symptoms. The analysis measured change from baseline to the end of the study in both a supine and sitting position where a negative score indicates improvement and a positive score reflects worsening.
Number of Subjects Requiring Health and Home Care Resource UseBaseline through study completion (2- 48 weeks after study entry)The number of study subjects requiring Health and home care resource use was aggregated over the course of the study for each subject and summarised using descriptive statistics.
Disease ProgressionFrom Baseline through study completion(subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)Count of study withdrawals due to disease progression
Health Care Service Use During the Study(Stays in Hospital)From baseline to the end of the study(2-48 weeks after study entry)The number of night stays in hospital were recorded throughout the study using a diary given to the study subjects
Health Care Service Use During the Study(Visits to the Emergency Room)From baseline to the end of the study(2-48 weeks after study entry)The number of visits to the emergency room were recorded throughout the study using a diary given to the study subjects
Health Care Service Use During the Study (Days Spent in an Institutional Facility)From baseline to the end of the study(2-48 weeks after study entry)The number of days spent in an institutional facility were recorded throughout the study using a diary given to the study subjects
Subject's Status for Tracheostomy and SurvivalBaseline to end of study (average 2-48 weeks after study entryNumber of patients with the need for tracheostomy or who died whilst on treatment from baseline to the end of the study was summarised using descriptive statistics.
Supine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)The change from Baseline, week 2, week 4, month 3, month 6, end-of-study (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)Change from baseline in supine and sitting SVC (all devices) through to the end of the study, expressed as a % of predicted normal
Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R)Change from Baseline in respiratory function of ALSFRS-R at study completion (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)ALSFRS-R scale contains 3 parameters related to respiratory function: Severity of dyspnea, occurrence of orthopnea (shortness of breath when in supine position i.e. lying flat), and the use of mechanical ventilation for respiratory in sufficiency. These 3 parameters are combined to create the respiratory domain with a score of 0-12(where 12 is normal function). Although individual items and patients vary, ALSFRS-R typically declines at a relatively constant rate over time. Plotted over time the slope of the line obtained indicates the speed of progression and thus an effective treatment might be expected ro reduce the slope of decline.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) who completed 48 weeks of treatment in the REFALS study (NCT03505021) were recruited

Pre-assignment details

Male or female subjects with a diagnosis of probable or definite ALS having completed 48 weeks of treatment in the REFALS Study (NCT03505021) and able to swallow study treatment capsules at the time of completing 48 weeks of dosing in the REFALS study. Written or verbal informed consent obtained.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Levosimendan
Oral Levosimendan; Levosimendan 1mg capsules for oral administration, once to twice a day, continued as long as clinically beneficial. The total study duration is up to 3 years. Levosimendan: Levosimendan 1 mg capsule for oral administration
227
Total227

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyDisease progression30
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyPersonal reason14
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudyReason not known2
Overall StudySponsor terminated study164
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLevosimendan
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
67 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
160 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
224 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
218 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
142 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
19 / 227
other
Total, other adverse events
215 / 227
serious
Total, serious adverse events
44 / 227

Outcome results

Primary

12-lead Electrocardiogram Assessments

Summarisation of any abnormal 12-lead ECG findings using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, month 3, month 6, end-of-study(subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis of patients in the safety population defined as all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Levosimendan12-lead Electrocardiogram AssessmentsBaseline abnormal ECG69 Participants
Levosimendan12-lead Electrocardiogram AssessmentsWeek 2 abnormal ECG56 Participants
Levosimendan12-lead Electrocardiogram AssessmentsWeek 4 abnormal ECG43 Participants
Levosimendan12-lead Electrocardiogram AssessmentsMonth 3 abnormal ECG27 Participants
Levosimendan12-lead Electrocardiogram AssessmentsMonth 6 abnormal ECG11 Participants
Levosimendan12-lead Electrocardiogram AssessmentsEnd-of study abnormal ECG36 Participants
Primary

Adverse Events Recording

Adverse Events as subject counts and proportions (%) of subject per Adverse Event

Time frame: From signing informed consent until 14-25 days after the last study treatment for all patients, an average of 23.5 weeks.

Population: Analysis is reported for the safety population which included all subjects receiving any study treatment. Treatment emergent AEs are defined as any event arising or worsening after the start of study treatment until 25 days after the individual subject's last study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LevosimendanAdverse Events Recording161 Participants
Primary

Pulse/Heart Rate Assessment

Actual values and changes from baseline in supine pre-dose pulse/heart rate were summarised using descriptive statistics .

Time frame: Change in pulse and heart rate(from ECG recording) from Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6 (pulse rate only), Month 3, Month 6, end of study (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population which included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment. The change from baseline in pulse and heart rate was measured at week 2, week 4, week 6 (pulse rate only) Month 3, Month 6 and the individual subject 's last visit in the study. The number of subjects analysed at each timepoint differs from the total number of subjects that entered the study as some study subjects did not undergo the assessment at all timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in pulse rate at week 27.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 8.8
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in pulse rate at 4 weeks10.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.4
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in pulse rate at week 68.5 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 12
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate Assessmentchnage in pulse rate at Month 310.4 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.6
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in pulse rate at month 612.8 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.6
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in pulse rate at end-of-study3.5 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 12.6
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in Heart rate at week 29.1 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.1
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in Heart rate at week 412.8 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.4
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in heart rate at Month 312.6 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.3
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in heart rate at month 615.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.9
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentChange in heart rate at end-of-study5.3 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.9
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentBaseline supine pulse rate75.8 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 12.5
LevosimendanPulse/Heart Rate AssessmentBaseline supine heart rate73.5 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 12
Secondary

Borg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)

Patients rated their perception of the severity of their dyspnea using the Borg Category Ration 10 scale (CR 10). The scale ranges from 0(no dysponea) to 10 (maximal dyspnea). each category is numbered and most but not all have verbal cues. At each assessment the patient scored the category they felt best described their symptoms. The analysis measured change from baseline to the end of the study in both a supine and sitting position where a negative score indicates improvement and a positive score reflects worsening.

Time frame: Baseline through study completion (week 2, week 4, month 3, month 6, end of study (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population which included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment. The change from baseline in pulse and heart rate was measured at week 2, week 4, week 6 (pulse rate only) Month 3, Month 6 and the individual subject 's last visit in the study. The number of subjects analysed at each timepoint differs from the total number of subjects that entered the study as some study subjects did not undergo the assessment at all timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Baseline in Borg score Supine position2.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score supine at week 20.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)chenge from baseline in Borg score week 40.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score supine at month 30.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score supine at month 61.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score supine at end of study1.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Baseline Borg score sitting2.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score sitting at week 20.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score sitting at week 40.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score sitting at month 30.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score sitting month 61.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
LevosimendanBorg Category Ratio 10 Scale (CR 10)Change from baseline in Borg score sitting at end of study1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Secondary

Disease Progression

Count of study withdrawals due to disease progression

Time frame: From Baseline through study completion(subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Number of study withdrawals due to disease progression were collected for all subjects entered into the study. The study sponsor terminated the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LevosimendanDisease ProgressionTotal withdrawal due to sponsor terminating the study164 Participants
LevosimendanDisease ProgressionNumber of withdrawals due to disease progression30 Participants
Secondary

Health Care Service Use During the Study (Days Spent in an Institutional Facility)

The number of days spent in an institutional facility were recorded throughout the study using a diary given to the study subjects

Time frame: From baseline to the end of the study(2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis performed on the safety population defined as any subject receiving at least one dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanHealth Care Service Use During the Study (Days Spent in an Institutional Facility)4.7 daysStandard Deviation 28.2
Secondary

Health Care Service Use During the Study(Stays in Hospital)

The number of night stays in hospital were recorded throughout the study using a diary given to the study subjects

Time frame: From baseline to the end of the study(2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis performed on the safety population defined as any subject receiving at least one dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanHealth Care Service Use During the Study(Stays in Hospital)0.7 NightsStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Health Care Service Use During the Study(Visits to the Emergency Room)

The number of visits to the emergency room were recorded throughout the study using a diary given to the study subjects

Time frame: From baseline to the end of the study(2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis performed on the safety population defined as any subject receiving at least one dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanHealth Care Service Use During the Study(Visits to the Emergency Room)0.1 visitsStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Need for Respiratory Support Device

Time to respiratory device support (non invasive) or death

Time frame: Time to event at study completion (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analyses were performed in the safety population in which all subjects received at least one dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanNeed for Respiratory Support Device259.5 daysStandard Error 10.46
Secondary

Number of Subjects Requiring Health and Home Care Resource Use

The number of study subjects requiring Health and home care resource use was aggregated over the course of the study for each subject and summarised using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Baseline through study completion (2- 48 weeks after study entry)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LevosimendanNumber of Subjects Requiring Health and Home Care Resource Use95 Participants
Secondary

Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R)

ALSFRS-R scale contains 3 parameters related to respiratory function: Severity of dyspnea, occurrence of orthopnea (shortness of breath when in supine position i.e. lying flat), and the use of mechanical ventilation for respiratory in sufficiency. These 3 parameters are combined to create the respiratory domain with a score of 0-12(where 12 is normal function). Although individual items and patients vary, ALSFRS-R typically declines at a relatively constant rate over time. Plotted over time the slope of the line obtained indicates the speed of progression and thus an effective treatment might be expected ro reduce the slope of decline.

Time frame: Change from Baseline in respiratory function of ALSFRS-R at study completion (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population which included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment. The change from baseline in pulse and heart rate was measured at week 2, week 4, week 6 (pulse rate only) Month 3, Month 6 and the individual subject 's last visit in the study. The number of subjects analysed at each timepoint differs from the total number of subjects that entered the study as some study subjects did not undergo the assessment at all timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanRevised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R)Change from baseline in respiratory function ALSFR-S at end of study-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
LevosimendanRevised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R)Baseline respiratory ALSFRS-R9.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Subject's Status for Tracheostomy and Survival

Number of patients with the need for tracheostomy or who died whilst on treatment from baseline to the end of the study was summarised using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Baseline to end of study (average 2-48 weeks after study entry

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population which includes all subjects receiving at least one dose of study treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LevosimendanSubject's Status for Tracheostomy and SurvivalNumber of participants who died from baseline to end of the study treatment5 Participants
LevosimendanSubject's Status for Tracheostomy and SurvivalNumber of participants requiring tracheostomy from baseline to the end of the study treatment0 Participants
Secondary

Supine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)

Change from baseline in supine and sitting SVC (all devices) through to the end of the study, expressed as a % of predicted normal

Time frame: The change from Baseline, week 2, week 4, month 3, month 6, end-of-study (subject's last visit, 2-48 weeks after study entry)

Population: Analysis was performed on the safety population which included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment. The change from baseline in pulse and heart rate was measured at week 2, week 4, week 6 (pulse rate only) Month 3, Month 6 and the individual subject 's last visit in the study. The number of subjects analysed at each timepoint differs from the total number of subjects that entered the study as some study subjects did not undergo the assessment at all timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in supine SVC at the end of the study-5.6 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 17.4
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in supine SVC at week 21.5 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 7.2
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in supine SVC at week 40.8 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 10.2
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in supine SVC at month 3-3.5 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 10.4
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in supine SVC at month 6-5.3 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 13.2
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in sitting SVC at week 21.4 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 6.6
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in sitting SVC at week 42.1 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 9.8
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in sitting SVC month 3-1.9 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 11.9
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in sitting SVC month 6-6.1 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 12.4
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Change from baseline in sitting SVC at the end of the study-7.3 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 12.1
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Baseline Supine SVC (% predicted normal54.4 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 21.6
LevosimendanSupine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)Baseline Sitting SVC (% predicted normal)61.4 % of predicted normalStandard Deviation 19.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026