Skip to content

Clinical Tial of Er:YAG Laser Snoring Treatment

Safety and Efficacy of Different Modes of Er:YAG Laser Treatment for Snoring in Comparison With Placebo

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03947424
Enrollment
75
Registered
2019-05-13
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2024-05-01
Last updated
2023-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Snoring

Keywords

laser, Er:YAG, NightLase, Fotona SMOOTH

Brief summary

Two modes of laser (Er:YAG) treatment for snoring will be compared with sham treatment in a randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of snoring treatment using non-ablative Er:YAG laser in comparison with sham laser treatment. Furthermore, to different modes of Er:YAG laser will be compared; a long-pulse mode (LP) and proprietary SMOOTH mode (Fotona, Slovenia).

Interventions

DEVICELP Er:YAG

LP Er:YAG applied to oral mucosa

DEVICESMOOTH mode Er:YAG

SMOOTH mode Er:YAG applied to oral mucosa

DEVICEsham

Er:YAG laser applied to oral mucosa with no energy

Sponsors

Luis Monteiro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Sham treatment consists of laser treatment according to the same protocol as active treatment but with no energy applied. Clinical measurements will be performed by an evaluator unaware of group assignment.

Intervention model description

Three groups; laser (LP), laser (SMOOTH), control (sham)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed Informed consent form * Diagnosis of snoring/apnea including partner information * Age greater than 18 years. * Apnea-Hypopnea index (AHI) less than 30. * No significant nasal stenosis. * Bed partner present

Exclusion criteria

* People who refuse to participate in the study * Presence of concomitant disorders and/or diseases * Infections in the throat * current use of photosensitive drugs * pregnancy * scarring in the throat * acute pollen allergies * epilepsy * People starting with an extreme diet or weight loss plan * Patients who do not want to follow post treatment recommendation concerning food and drinks intake * Larynx obstruction (floppy epiglottis) * Oropharynx obstruction caused by palatine tonsils (\>50%).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NightLase Snoring Questionnaire-Question 1: Snoring severity change from baseline6 monthsThis questionnaire consists of eight questions, assessing the severity of snoring (the first question) and other problems associated with sleep-disordered breathing (questions 2-8). Answers will be graded on 11-point scales (0-10) .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NightLase Snoring Questionnaire-Question 1: Snoring severity change from baseline3 monthsThis questionnaire consists of eight questions, assessing the severity of snoring (the first question) and other problems associated with sleep-disordered breathing (questions 2-8). Answers will be graded on 11-point scales (0-10) .
NightLase Snoring Questionnaire change from baseline1 monthThis questionnaire consists of eight questions, assessing the severity of snoring (the first question) and other problems associated with sleep-disordered breathing (questions 2-8). Answers will be graded on 11-point scales (0-10) .
Change in EpWorth somnolence scale from baseline1 monthThe level of daytime sleepiness in the patients was assessed using the 24-point Epworth scale. Values 0-10 are considered normal, and values 11-24 represent increasing levels of 'excessive daytime sleepiness'.
Change in Quality of life Questionnaire score from baseline1 monthOral Health Impact Profile-14 on the scale from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating a poorer oral health-related quality of life.
Change from baseline in snoring value1 monthSnorelab software used to record snoring
Change in O2 saturation (%) from baseline.3 monthsMeasured by polysomnography.
Change in snoring time (mean duration of episode in s) from baseline.3 monthsMeasured by polysomnography.
Change in percentage snoring time of total sleep time (%) from baseline.3 monthsMeasured by polysomnography.
Change in Apnea - Hypopnea Index (AHI) from baseline.3 monthsMeasured by polysomnography.

Countries

Portugal

Contacts

Primary ContactLuis Monteiro, DMD, PhD
luis.monteiro@iucs.cespu.pt+351 919120226

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026