Skip to content

Comparison of Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis

Comparison of Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03947372
Enrollment
116
Registered
2019-05-13
Start date
2015-02-21
Completion date
2015-08-20
Last updated
2019-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendectomy, Length of Stay, Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Open Appendectomy, Laparoscopic Appendectomy, post-operative pain, Hospital stay

Brief summary

A comparison study was performed between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in acute setting in tertiary hospital to access the outcome of postoperative pain and hospital stay. As the popularity of laparoscopic appendectomy has failed in major tertiary hospital due to huge amount of patient load in which open appendectomy was performed.This study was performed to prove that outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy are far better than open appendectomy and to increase the use of laparoscopic surgery in acute settings

Detailed description

Introduction: Open appendicectomy has been a safe and usually opted mode of operation for acute appendicitis for more than a century, but since last 10 years laparoscopic appendicectomy is gaining popularity, although still not as popular as laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comparison of these two is studied in terms of pain outcome as patient perceives and length of hospital stay. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized control trial SETTING: Surgical Unit I, Services Hospital, Lahore DURATION OF STUDY: Duration of my study was six months after the approval of synopsis i.e 21-02-2015 to 20-08-2015. SAMPLE SIZE: Was calculated using WHO method of calculating sample size. SAMPLING TECHNIQUE: Non probability consecutive sampling. DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE: All patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria was admitted through the emergency after taking approval from hospital Ethical committee. A detailed history had been taken including demographic data (age, address). Patients was requested to sign an informed consent. They had been assured regarding confidentiality and expertise used for the procedure. All procedures was done by a single operating surgical team to control bias. All the data/variables was recorded on a specially designed Performa attached which are post-op pain at 12hrs and 24 hrs, post-Op stay and patient satisfaction score.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAppendectomy

removal of acutely inflamed appendix

Sponsors

Services Hospital, Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* with acute appendicitis confirmed clinically by pain in right iliac fossa accompanied by right iliac fossa tenderness, elevated leukocyte count (\>8\*109/ml) without a palpable mass and on radiological investigation admitted through emergency department were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* • Perforated appendix (had been assesses on abdominal ultrasound or per-operatively. * Palpable mass in the right lower quadrant as assessed by clinical exam. * History of Co-morbidities e.g. known diabetic, known hypertensive, cirrhosis as shown by ultrasonography and coagulation disorder (to be determined by low platelet count; \<140 \*109, deranged PT and APTT).(PT=13sec, APTT= 33 sec) * Patients unfit for surgery (ASA Grade III/IV). * Patient who did not give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Post-operative painpatient was assessed after 12 and 24 hours of surgery and change noted in 24 hourVisual Analogue Score at 12 and 24 hours after surgery . Score 0-10 where '0 shows no distress and '10' shows severe distress.
Hospital Staypatient was assessed from 1 to 6 days after surgeryHad been the total number of days spent in hospital during the same admission (from date of operation till date of discharge).Patient had been discharged as soon as bowel sounds are audible, passed flatus and resumed oral feeding.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026