Bone Resorption
Conditions
Keywords
implants; GBR; DBBM; grafts; bone
Brief summary
This study will be an open, prospective, split-mouth, randomised controlled clinical trial. A total of 14 patients searching for oral implant treatment and where a GBR procedure is indicated per implant treatment will be enrolled. All patients have to fulfill all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. From all patients clinical photos will be taken. Two sites within a patient will be randomly allocated to the 'autologous bone chips and DBBM or 'DBBM particles alone' group. The study will be 1 year follow-up study comprising 9 visits
Detailed description
A randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) to compare the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in combination with autogenous bone chips versus a DBBM alone for the augmentation of bony dehiscence after dental implant placement Objectives: 1. To test whether the use of DBBM is not inferior to the use of a combination of DBBM and autogenous bone chips for the filling of bony dehiscence around dental implants 2\. To test whether a digital impression technique can be used to measure guided bone regeneration in comparison to conventional measurement with a dental probe and to compare these observations with cone beam CT images Study Design: Randomized, controlled, single center, split mouth study Study Population: Partially edentulous male or female patients in need for oral implants for a fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitation and where a Guide Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedure is indicated during implant treatment Patient Number: 14 Duration of treatment: The time in the study for each patient will be 1 year and 4 months. The treatment period includes implant and abutment installation (in a twostage procedure), with a healing time of minimum 12 weeks before the start of the prosthetic phase. Study devices: Implants: 3.3 / 4.1 / 4.8 mm Straumann Bone level implants Bone Graft: DBB (Demineralised Bovine Bone, Bio OSS) Measuring Devices: Cadent iTero & software and Dental Probes Prosthetics: Straumann (computer aided design computer aided manufacturing (CAD CAM) crowns and abutments Outcome variables: Primary outcome variable: Difference in bone fill between DBB + bone chips vs. DBB without bone chips afer 24 weeks of submerged healing. The ideal bone volume as defined at base line (= 100%) will be compared to the received bone fill \[%\] at re-entry measured by a digital impression technique (before and after GBR, and at abutment connection, before and after raising a flap, and at the 1-year follow-up). The method of digital impression will be compared to CBCT immediately after implant placemetn and 1 year and periodontal probing during surgery and re-enty Secondary Parameters: Page 5 of 35 A comparison of 3 different tools (probe, CBCT and digital impression) for measuring the bone volume changes in relation to GBR procedures. Implant survival en success rates on a patient and implant level Marginal bone level alterations Safety: Adverse Events / Adverse Device Effects
Interventions
PROCEDUREGuided bone regeneration with or without autologous bone
Autogenous bone chips were collected. On each side a bone level implant was placed. The bone dehiscence was measured and was thereafter treated according to the GBR protocol. A resorbable native collagen was adapted to the defect.
Sponsors
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Split mouth
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* \> 18 years, * in need of a solitary implant in quadrant 1 and 2 or quadrant 3 and 4 with simultaneous GBR procedure * presence of a pre-operative CBCT.
Exclusion criteria
* smokers * patients with systemic diseases that could interfere with the healing * patients undergoing bisphosphonate treatment * patients who previously received radiation therapy of the jaws * patients that received a GBR procedure in the region of interest in the past.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal and vertical bone augmentation | 16 weeks | The change of dimension was assessed comparing Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans (CBCT) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Success of grafting procedure as assessed by clinical interpretation | 1 year | Defined as no persistent pain in the grafted area and no suppuration or expulsion of graft material and implant survival rates being lack of mobility, absence of peri-implant radiolucency, absence of recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration, absence of continuous or recurrent pain, and no structural failure of the implant |
| Marginal bone level alterations assessed on peri-apical radiographs using software (ImageJ) | 1 year | measured from a reference point (implant shoulder) to the most coronal point of BIC, both mesially and distally |
Outcome results
None listed