Skip to content

Compare Diagnostic Performance of DIXON &CHESS Sequences Calculating RAMRIS Score in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of DIXON Sequences With CHESS Sequences by Calculation of the RAMRIS Score in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03943563
Acronym
IDEAL PR
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-05-09
Start date
2016-05-13
Completion date
2019-08-16
Last updated
2024-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Brief summary

In a preliminary MRI study of healthy volunteers's hands investigators showed that the suppression of the fat signal obtained by the Dixon sequences is greater than that obtained by the classic CHESS sequences with a better T1-weighted image quality. The investigators goal now is to compare these sequences in the quantification of the inflammatory activity of rheumatoid arthritis by the RAMRIS score. To investigators knowledge, only one study compared those two types of sequence with many limitations including a limited number of patients included.

Detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common chronic inflammatory arthropathy and it mostly affect young women. The MRI sequences currently validated for the joint inflammation assessment are the fat-suppressed sequences produced either by spectral presaturation (CHESS sequences) or by inversion-recovery (STIR = short tau inversion recovery sequence). The presaturation sequences outweigh the STIR sequence due to higher spatial resolution at the expense of sometimes more random saturation of the fat signal. Recently, a third method of suppressing the fat signal (Dixon method) has reappeared thanks to advances in computing power (post-processing). In a preliminary MRI study of the hands of healthy volunteers, the investigators showed that the suppression of the fat signal obtained by the Dixon sequences is greater than that obtained by the classic CHESS sequences in T1 and T2 weighting with better quality. image in T1 weighting. This increased performance, particularly in terms of fat suppression, could lead to better detection of PR lesions on MRI.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDixon sequences acquisition

Dixon sequences acquisition

Sponsors

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Masking description

None at the time of intervention. At the end of the study, Blind reading without knowledge of the type: Dixon or classic sequences.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \- Rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis for less than 3 years

Exclusion criteria

* contraindication to Dotarem contrast injection * contraindication to MRI due to incompatible implanted material (peacemaker, prosthesis,...)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ramris scorean average of 3 year* Calculation of the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS score) for each sequence by two independent radiologists. RAMRIS is used to evaluate erosions (scale, 0-10, 10 representing the worst situation), edema (scale, 0-3, 3 representing the worst situation), and synovitis (scale, 0-3, 3 representing the worst situation) * Blind reading without knowledge of the type of Dixon or classic sequence

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026