Skip to content

Use of Gelronate Gel vs. Aloevera in Preventing/Minimizing Radiation-induced Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients

Double Blind Study - Use of Gelronate Gel vs. Aloevera in Preventing/Minimizing Radiation-induced Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03941665
Enrollment
136
Registered
2019-05-08
Start date
2019-03-25
Completion date
2020-05-03
Last updated
2020-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radiation Dermatitis

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of Gelronate gel, NaHA based product (medical device for topical application) vs. Aloevera gel, in prevention or minimizing of radiation induced skin reaction in breast cancer patients

Detailed description

Gelronate is gel composed of 1% high molecular weight pharmaceutical grade sodium hyaluronate and preservatives dissolved in pharmaceutical grade purified water. Gelronate supply in an airless pump bottle contain \ 30 ml gel. In the study, 120 female patients planned to receive whole breast radiation (with or without lymphatic drainage) in the radiotherapy unit at Sheba Medical Center. Patients will undergo CT simulation with 3D treatment planning (as routine done) and will receive 42.4 Gy in daily fraction of 2.65 Gy, five times per week to the whole breast according to the standard department protocol, with or without concomitant or subsequent lumpectomy cavity boost. Patients data including demographics, staging, systemic therapy, radiation details, other medications will be recorded the protocol's forms. The gel will be applied as a thin lotion twice a day, immediately after radiotherapy treatment and once more in the evening/morning. The therapy will continue for 10 days following the end of radiation therapy.

Interventions

DEVICEGelronate

Gel for topical use

Gel for topical use

Sponsors

Ferring Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sheba Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Double blind study

Intervention model description

Double blind study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients aged at least 18 years with unilateral breast following lumpectomy +/- chemotherapy * Planned to receive 42.4 Gy whole breast irradiation +/- boost to tumor bed. * ECOG performance status 0-2. * Capable of giving written informed consent. * No co-morbidities known to affect radiotherapy reactions. * No co-existing acute or chronic skin disease. * No evidence of infection or inflammation of breast to be treated. * Not receiving chemotherapy during radiotherapy course. Biological therapy (e.g. Herceptin) or hormone therapy will be allowed during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Chemotherapy within 4 weeks prior to planned start of radiation or chemotherapy planned during radiation. * Prior radiotherapy to the chest wall. * Collagen vascular disease. * Participation in other clinical study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Development and degree of any skin reaction4 weeksGrading according to Radiation Toxicity Grading (RTOG) skin toxicity score. Full scale of RTOG is 0 (no change over baseline) to 4 (ulceration, hemorrhage, necrosis).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin reaction requiring conventional topical therapy4 weeksSkin reaction requiring conventional topical therapy (e.g. steroid cream etc.) as evaluated by clinical. judgment of radiotherapy nurse/radiation oncologist at OTV (on treatment view visit that will include RTOG (Radiation Toxicity Grading) scores (in the range 0 no change to 4 ulceration, hemorrhage, necrosis) and dermatology assessment according to the table in the protocol (general view range 1 (nothing) to 4 (continuous))

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026