Skip to content

EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis for the Treatment of Abdominal Pain in Pancreatic Cancer

EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis Using Ropivacaine Combined With Anhydrous Alcohol for the Treatment of Abdominal Pain in Pancreatic Cancer: a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03940027
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-05-07
Start date
2019-02-10
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2019-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

EUS-guided CPN

Brief summary

Studies have shown that injecting local anesthetics in areas rich in blood vessels increases the risk of drug injection into blood vessels by mistake and increases the systemic absorption of drugs, which may increase the incidence of central nervous system and cardiovascular system toxic events caused by local anesthetics.EUS-CPN-related complications have not been clearly associated with local anesthetic adverse events.However, EUS-CPN local anesthetic injection area is located around the beginning of the abdominal trunk with abundant large and small blood vessels. The choice of local anesthetics with higher safety than bupivacaine, such as ropivacaine, is of great significance to ensure the safety of eus-cpn, especially for eus-cpn beginners.At present, there are no reports on the application of ropivacaine in eus-cpn.

Interventions

EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUE-CPN) is an endoscopic ultrasound-guided injection of local anesthetics and neurodegenerative agents into the abdominal ganglion area through the gastric wall, so as to achieve irreversible damage of the abdominal nerve and interrupt the pain pathway of pancreatic cancer.EUS-CPN has the advantages of less trauma, higher technical success rate and lower risk of complications compared with traditional ct-guided CPN in vitro puncture.The data showed that eus-cpn was effective in the treatment of pancreatic cancer related persistent abdominal pain up to about 70%, significantly reducing the dosage of analgesics and improving the quality of life of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Sponsors

Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Cancer Hospital, China
CollaboratorOTHER
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Changhai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

The included patients were divided into two groups (stage III and stage IV) according to tumor staging, and the patients in the two groups were randomly divided into two groups for EUS-CPN treatment with ropivacaine + anhydrous alcohol regimen and bupivacaine + anhydrous alcohol regimen

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged between 18-75; 2. Athologically confirmed as pancreatic cancer and clinically evaluated as advanced and unresectable; 3. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain ≥ 4; 4. Never received treatment for peritoneal plexus lesion or block; 5. Voluntary signing of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Women during pregnancy; 2. Cannot or refuses to sign the informed consent; 3. Blood clotting disorder(PLT \<50 × 103/μL, INR \> 1.5); 4. Celiac infection; 5. Severe esophageal or gastric varices and ulcers which may affect operation; 6. The anatomical variation of the abdominal trunk abdominal aorta and could not be accurately located; 7. Alcohol allergy 8. Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and inability to tolerate the risk of intravenous anesthesia; 9. History of mental illness; 10. Patients with other chronic and acute diseases with unstable conditions that are expected to affect the efficacy evaluation and completion of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effective rate of abdominal pain relief2 weeksPreoperative and postoperative pain scores of the patients will be compared to estimate the effective rate of abdominal pain relief.
the incidence of serious complications2 weeksComplications like perforation, infection, pancreatitis, hemorrhage and local anesthetic complications (epilepsy, arrhythmia), etc.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of quality of life1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 yearPreoperative and postoperative quality of life questionnaire of the patients will be compared to estimate the improvement of quality of life

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShi-yu Li, M.D.
lizfish@126.com+86-15521243639

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026