Infantile Colic, Reflexology
Conditions
Keywords
complementary therapies, infantile colic, nurses, reflexology
Brief summary
Aim: To compare the effect of foot reflexology and placebo foot reflexology on colic symptoms such as pain, ineffective sleep, and colicky crying periods in infants with colic. Method: The study was conducted as a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in a child hospital between June 2016 and March 2017. To start with, 20 infants with colic were randomly selected for the reflexology group, and 25 babies with colic were randomly selected for the placebo group. Simple randomization was used; the parents and statistician were blinded to group assessment. The researcher could not be blinded because of the role played in the study. Foot reflexology was implemented with reflexology-group infants. Placebo foot reflexology was used with placebo-group infants. Both interventions were performed four times, for 20 minutes, each, by the researcher over the course of two weeks. The data were collected by the researcher using the information form, infantile colic scale, behavioral pain scale, crying and sleeping follow-up forms.
Interventions
OTHERFoot Reflexology
Reflexology is one of the complementary health approaches; it is based on systematic pressure and stimulation with fingers to energy points in feet and hands and is a topic nowadays studied. Reflexology argues that the reflex maps in the hands and feet with all of the parts of the body are in contact. The pressure applied to each point stimulates the circulation of blood and energy like a sensor, gives a sense of relaxation, provides homeostasis. With a touch that is a different way of communication with children, is supported to create physical awareness via reflexology techniques, and is provided healthy nutrition of the stimulated tissue.
OTHERPlacebo Foot Reflexology
Placebo reflexology was performed by touch without pressure to the same rotation and to the same points as foot reflexology application. It was performed only to compare foot reflexology with a placebo effect.
Sponsors
Akdeniz University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
All parents were only told that foot application would be done, without giving any expectations. In the statistical analysis, the groups were named Group-1 and Group-2, and the statistician was blinded when evaluating the outputs. The report was written by the statistician, who did not know which application was performed to which group blinding was provided in the report writing. The scales were evaluated by the researcher, who could not be blinded due to the nature of the study.
Intervention model description
This was an experimental, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 3 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Infants were included who were aged 1-3 months, Infants who were diagnosed IC by a pediatrician according to Wessel's rule of threes.
Exclusion criteria
(Beckmann & Le Quesne, 2005): Infants who were using any of analgesic drug until 3 hours before the applications and antibiotic or steroid due to treating an illness, Infants who had an acute fever, musculoskeletal disease, active shingles or infection, acute shingles, or tissue in the foot and joint, All infants with any non-IC health problems.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Infantile Colic State | In two weeks | Ellet et al. (2002) developed a Likert-type scale to determine the factors causing colic and to diagnose colic. The scale consists of 5 sub-dimensions and 22 items. Sub-dimensions include 'Cow's Milk/Soy Protein Allergy/Intolerance', 'Immature Gastrointestinal System', 'Immature Central Nervous System', 'Difficult Infant Temperament', and 'Parent-Infant Interaction + Problem Infant'. These headings include factors affecting the infant's colic, such as sleep characteristics, consolability, features of crying, infant mood, and parent-infant interaction. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was .69 (Ellett et al., 2003). Cetinkaya and Başbakkal (2007) tested the validity and reliability of the scale for the Turkish population and reported Cronbach's α to be .73 (Cetinkaya & Basbakkal, 2007). In this study, it was determined to be .65. |
| Colicky Pain | In two weeks | The FLACC scale developed by Merkel et al. in 1997 is used to help determine the level of pain in infants and children. The parameters of scale include infant 'Facial expressions, Leg movements, Activities, Crying, and Consolability' (Voepel-Lewis, Shayevitz, & Malviya, 1997). The maximum score of this scale is ten, shows the highest pain. On the other hands; the minimum score is zero, shows that no pain. Şenaylı et al. (2006) reported that the scale could be used in Turkish population (Şenaylı, Özkan, Şenaylı, & Bıçakçı, 2006). |
| Colicky Crying | In two weeks | Crying follow-up form was prepared by the researcher to determine the duration of crying in infants. Colic crying differs from ordinary crying as it is louder than normal and inconsolable. It occurs usually suddenly and takes several consecutive hours (Helseth, 2002). Based on this information, when crying ended, parents were asked to record crying times over half an hour, with start and end times. The form required hourly recording by the parents for two weeks. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sleeping | In two weeks | Sleeping follow-up form was prepared by the researcher to determine the duration of sleeping in infants. The form required hourly recording by the parents for two weeks. |
Outcome results
None listed