Skip to content

Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Oral Atogepant for the Prevention of Migraine in Participants With Episodic Migraine

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label 40-week Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Oral Atogepant for the Prevention of Migraine in Participants With Episodic Migraine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03939312
Enrollment
685
Registered
2019-05-06
Start date
2019-05-06
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2022-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Episodic Migraine

Keywords

Migraine, Aura

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of atogepant 60 mg once a day for the prevention of migraine in participants with episodic migraine.

Interventions

DRUGAtogepant

Atogepant Tablets

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent and participant privacy information (eg, written authorization for use and release of health and research study information) obtained from the participant prior to initiation of any study-specific procedures. * Participants must be using a medically acceptable and effective method of birth control during the course of the entire study. * Eligible participants who completed the double-blind treatment period (Visit 7) and the follow-up period (Visit 8), if applicable, depending on the timing of study initiation, of Study 3101-301-002 (NCT03777059) without significant protocol deviations (eg, noncompliance to protocol-required procedures).

Exclusion criteria

* Female participant is pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the course of the study, or currently lactating. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1. * Hypertension as defined by sitting systolic BP \> 160 mm Hg or sitting diastolic BP \> 100 mm Hg at Visit 1. * Participants with clinically significant hematologic, endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, or neurologic disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TEAEs/TESAEs)From dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to approximately Week 44)An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorUp to Week 44Clinical laboratory test values are considered PCS if they meet either the lower-limit or higher-limit PCS criteria defined in the categories below. Percentage of participants with PCS laboratory values are summarized for chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during post-baseline are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorUp to Week 4012-lead ECGs were performed at select study visits. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during postbaseline are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorUp to Week 44PCS postbaseline vital sign values are summarized for categories: systolic and diastolic blood pressures \[sitting and standing\], pulse rate \[sitting and standing\], respiratory rate, temperature, weight. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during postbaseline are reported.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour Using 5-Point Scale of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)OL Treatment Period: Up to Week 40; Safety Follow-up Period: Week 44C-SSRS is a clinician-rated instrument that reports the severity of both suicidal ideation and behavior. Suicidal ideation is classified on a 5-item scale: 1 (wish to be dead), 2 (nonspecific active suicidal thoughts), 3 (active suicidal ideation with any methods \[not plan\] without intent to act), 4 (active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan), and 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent). Suicidal behavior is classified on a 5-item scale: 0 (no suicidal behavior), 1 (preparatory acts or behavior), 2 (aborted attempt), 3 (interrupted attempt), and 4 (actual attempt). More than 1 classification can be selected provided they represent separate episodes. Suicidal ideation: Minimum total score 1, maximum total score 5; higher total scores indicate more suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior: Minimum total score 0, maximum total score 4; higher total scores indicate more suicidal behavior.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants rolled over from the lead-in study 3101-301-002 (NCT03777059) into this extension study. This study consisted of two periods: Open-label (OL) Treatment Period and Safety Follow-up Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atogepant 60 mg
Participants received atogepant 60 mg, orally, QD for up to 40 weeks.
685
Total685

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Adverse Event25
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy4
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up19
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Non-compliance With Study Drug4
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Pregnancy3
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Protocol Deviation16
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Reason Not Specified22
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Site Terminated by Sponsor3
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject35
OL Treatment Period (40 Weeks)Withdrawal Criteria at Visit 143
Safety Follow-up 4 Weeks (Up to Week 44)Lost to Follow-up4
Safety Follow-up 4 Weeks (Up to Week 44)Withdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtogepant 60 mg
Age, Continuous41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
54 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
631 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
86 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
578 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
604 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 685
other
Total, other adverse events
71 / 685
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 685

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TEAEs/TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: From dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to approximately Week 44)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of atogepant in this extension study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TEAEs/TESAEs)TEAEs62.5 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TEAEs/TESAEs)TESAEs3.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour Using 5-Point Scale of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS is a clinician-rated instrument that reports the severity of both suicidal ideation and behavior. Suicidal ideation is classified on a 5-item scale: 1 (wish to be dead), 2 (nonspecific active suicidal thoughts), 3 (active suicidal ideation with any methods \[not plan\] without intent to act), 4 (active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan), and 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent). Suicidal behavior is classified on a 5-item scale: 0 (no suicidal behavior), 1 (preparatory acts or behavior), 2 (aborted attempt), 3 (interrupted attempt), and 4 (actual attempt). More than 1 classification can be selected provided they represent separate episodes. Suicidal ideation: Minimum total score 1, maximum total score 5; higher total scores indicate more suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior: Minimum total score 0, maximum total score 4; higher total scores indicate more suicidal behavior.

Time frame: OL Treatment Period: Up to Week 40; Safety Follow-up Period: Week 44

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of atogepant in this extension study. One Safety population was used for the entire study. If participants were eligible for the Safety Follow-up they were included in the analyses even if they did not participate in the Safety Follow-up Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Atogepant 60 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour Using 5-Point Scale of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Ideation4 Participants
Atogepant 60 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour Using 5-Point Scale of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Behavior0 Participants
Safety Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour Using 5-Point Scale of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Ideation1 Participants
Safety Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour Using 5-Point Scale of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Suicidal Behavior0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the Investigator

12-lead ECGs were performed at select study visits. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during postbaseline are reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 40

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of atogepant in this extension study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorQRS Duration, Single Beat (msec): ≥ 150 milliseconds (msecs)0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorPR interval, Single Beat (msec): ≥ 250 msecs0.5 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorQTcB interval, Single Beat (msec): > 500 msecs0.2 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorQTcB interval, Single Beat (msec): Increase > 60 msecs0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorQTcF interval, Single Beat (msec): Increase > 60 msecs0.2 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorQTcF interval, Single Beat (msec): >450 msecs3.4 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings as Assessed by the InvestigatorQTcF interval, Single Beat (msec): >480 msecs0.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the Investigator

Clinical laboratory test values are considered PCS if they meet either the lower-limit or higher-limit PCS criteria defined in the categories below. Percentage of participants with PCS laboratory values are summarized for chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during post-baseline are reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 44

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of atogepant in this extension study. Number analyzed are participants with data available for analyses of the specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorHematocrit (Ratio): > 1.1 × ULN0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorEosinophils Absolute Cell Count (10^9/L): > 2.0 × Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorHematocrit (Ratio): < 0.9 × Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)1.5 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorHemoglobin (g/L): < 0.9 × LLN2.2 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorLymphocytes Absolute Cell Count (10^9/L): < 0.7 × LLN0.6 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorLymphocytes Absolute Cell Count (10^9/L): > 1.3 × ULN0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorMonocytes Absolute Cell Count (10^9/L): < 0.5 × LLN0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorNeutrophils Absolute Cell Count (10^9/L): < 0.7 × LLN1.6 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorNeutrophils Absolute Cell Count (10^9/L): > 1.3 × ULN4.4 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorPlatelet Count (Thrombocytes) (10^9/L): < 0.5 × LLN0.1 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorPlatelet Count (Thrombocytes) (10^9/L): > 1.5 × ULN0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorRed Blood Cell Count (10^12/L): < 0.9 × LLN2.4 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorRed Blood Cell Count (10^12/L): > 1.1 × ULN0.1 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorWhite Blood Cell Count (10^9/L): < 0.9 × LLN3.5 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorWhite Blood Cell Count (10^9/L): > 1.5 × ULN0.6 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorAlanine Aminotransferase (SGPT) (U/L): ≥ 3.0 × ULN0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorAspartate Aminotransferase (SGOT) (U/L): ≥ 3.0 × ULN0.4 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorBicarbonate (HCO3) (mmol/L): < 0.9 × LLN0.7 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorBilirubin, Total (umol/L): ≥ 1.5 × ULN0.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorBlood Urea Nitrogen (mmol/L): > 1.5 × ULN0.1 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorCreatine Kinase (U/L): > 2.0 × ULN5.0 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorCreatinine (umol/L): > 1.5 × ULN0.4 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorGlomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Estimated Calculation (mL/min/1.73m^2): < 60 mL/min/1.73m^215.6 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorGlucose, Non-fasting (mmol/L): < 0.8 × LLN2.2 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorGlucose, Non-fasting (mmol/L): > 2.0 × ULN0.9 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorPhosphorus (mmol/L): < 0.9 × LLN1.6 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorPhosphorus (mmol/L): > 1.1 × ULN0.6 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorPotassium (mmol/L): > 1.1 × ULN2.2 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorProtein, Total (g/L): < 0.9 × LLN0.7 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorUric Acid (Urate) (umol/L): > 1.2 × ULN0.7 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorUrine Glucose: At Least 1+0.9 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values as Assessed by the InvestigatorUrine Protein: At Least 1+27.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the Investigator

PCS postbaseline vital sign values are summarized for categories: systolic and diastolic blood pressures \[sitting and standing\], pulse rate \[sitting and standing\], respiratory rate, temperature, weight. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during postbaseline are reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 44

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of atogepant in this extension study. Number analyzed are participants with data available for analyses of the specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorSystolic Blood Pressure Sitting (mmHg): ≤ 90 and Decrease of ≥ 201.9 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorSystolic Blood Pressure Standing (mmHg): ≤ 90 and Decrease of ≥ 200.7 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorSystolic Blood Pressure Standing (mmHg): ≥ 180 and Increase of ≥ 200.1 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorStanding - Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): ≤ -209.8 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorDiastolic Blood Pressure Sitting (mmHg): ≤ 50 and Decrease of ≥ 150.6 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorDiastolic Blood Pressure Sitting (mmHg): ≥ 105 and Increase of ≥ 151.0 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorDiastolic Blood Pressure Standing (mmHg): ≤ 50 and Decrease of ≥ 150.7 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorDiastolic Blood Pressure Standing (mmHg): ≥ 105 and Increase of ≥ 151.5 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorStanding - Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg): ≤ -157.4 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorPulse Rate Sitting (beats/min): ≤ 50 and Decrease of ≥ 150.3 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorPulse Rate Standing (beats/min): ≤ 50 and Decrease of ≥ 150.4 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorPulse Rate Standing (beats/min): ≥ 120 and Increase of ≥ 151.8 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorStanding - Sitting Pulse Rate (beats/min): ≥ 256.8 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeight (kg): Decrease of ≥ 7 percent (%)23.9 percentage of participants
Atogepant 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Sign Measurements as Assessed by the InvestigatorWeight (kg): Increase of ≥ 7%9.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026