Skip to content

Evaluation of the Precision and Sensitivity of Tilmanocept Uptake Value (TUV) on Tc 99m Tilmanocept Planar Imaging

Evaluation of the Precision and Sensitivity of Tilmanocept Uptake Value (TUV) on Tc 99m Tilmanocept Planar Imaging

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03938636
Enrollment
116
Registered
2019-05-06
Start date
2019-04-08
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2023-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

RA, healthy control, tilmanocept, diagnostic, imaging

Brief summary

This clinical trial will look at scans of the hands and wrists taken from healthy control subjects (HCs) and from subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Before each scan, subjects will be given an injection of Tc 99m tilmanocept to help the scan identify inflammation in the hand and wrist joints, which can be a part of the RA disease. Data from the scans will be used to calculate a number referred to as tilmanocept uptake value (or TUV) that is a measure of how much Tc 99m tilmanocept has located in the joints. The questions this trial aims to answer are: * How consistent are the scan results (TUVs) when the scans are repeated over time? * What are normal TUVs in healthy people? This will help define abnormally high values in people with RA. * Are TUVs calculated early after a person starts a new drug to treat RA able to predict whether that person will have a good response to the drug later on (after it has had time to take full effect several weeks later)?

Detailed description

This trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single and repeated-dose study designed to evaluate the reliability and sensitivity of TUV assessments in healthy control subjects and subjects with active RA. This study is stratified into 3 arms. The first 2 arms, consisting of \[1\] disease-free HCs and \[2\] clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment, respectively, are designed to evaluate the image re-image and/or test re-test (i.e., repeated dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals. The third arm consists of clinically-diagnosed subjects with active RA who are candidates for initiation of, or change to, a new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy. This arm is designed to assess the efficacy of TUVglobal as an early predictor of response to the new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy.

Interventions

Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.

Sponsors

Navidea Biopharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single and repeated-dose study designed to evaluate the reliability and sensitivity of TUV assessments in healthy controls and subjects with active RA.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

ALL SUBJECTS: 1. The subject has provided written informed consent with HIPAA (Health Information Portability and Accountability Act) authorization before the initiation of any study-related procedures. 2. ARMS 1 and 2 (only): The subject has agreed to not engage in any diet, lifestyle, or medication changes until study completion. HEALTHY CONTROL SUBJECTS 3. The subject is between 18 and 80 years of age at the time of consent. 4. The subject is deemed to be clinically free of any inflammatory disease(s) and has not experienced joint pain for at least 28 days prior to the consent date. 5. The subject is not currently on anti-inflammatory drugs (including NSAIDs) and has not taken anti-inflammatories for at least 28 days prior to the consent date. 6. For all ongoing concomitant medications, the subject has maintained a stable dose for at least 28 days prior to the consent date. CLINICALLY DIAGNOSED ACTIVE RA SUBJECTS: 3\. The subject is at least 18 years of age and was ≥ 18 years of age at the time of RA diagnosis. 4\. The subject has moderate to severe RA as determined by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Classification Criteria (score of ≥ 6/10). 5\. The subject has a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of ≥ 3.2 (includes the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate \[ESR\] test and Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]). 6\. Subjects receiving traditional DMARDs must have been on therapy for ≥ 90 days and at a stable dose for ≥ 30 days prior to the first imaging visit (Day 0). 7\. If the subject is receiving bDMARD or janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy, they have been at a stable dose \> 180 days prior to the first imaging visit (Day 0). 8\. If the subject is receiving NSAIDs or oral corticosteroids, the dose has been stable for \> 28 days prior to first imaging visit (Day 1). The corticosteroid dose must be ≤ 10 mg/day of prednisone or an equivalent steroid dose. 9\. ARM 3 (only): The subject is receiving anti-rheumatic treatment and is a candidate for initiation of, or change to, a new anti-TNFα bDMARD treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. The subject is pregnant or lactating. 2. The subject size or weight is not compatible with imaging per the investigator. 3. The subject has had or is currently receiving radiation therapy or chemotherapy. 4. The subject has renal insufficiency as demonstrated by a glomerular filtration rate of \< 60 mL/min. 5. The subject has hepatic insufficiency as demonstrated by ALT (alanine aminotransferase \[SGPT\]) or AST (aspartate aminotransferase \[SGOT\]) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. 6. The subject has any severe, acute, or chronic medical conditions and/or psychiatric conditions and/or laboratory abnormalities that would impart, in the judgment of the investigator, excess risk associated with study participation or study drug administration that would deem the subject inappropriate for study participation. 7. The subject has a known allergy to or has had an adverse reaction to dextran exposure. 8. The subject has received an investigational product within 30 days prior to the Tc 99m tilmanocept administration. 9. The subject has received intra-articular corticosteroid injections ≤ 8 weeks prior to the first imaging visit (Day 0). 10. The subject has received any radiopharmaceutical within 7 days or 10 half-lives prior to the administration of Tc 99m tilmanocept.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVDay 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes (60A) and 75 minutes (60B) and at 180 minutes (180A) and 195 minutes (180B).The camera-specific precision of TUVjoint in subjects with active RA and Healthy Controls (HCs), which is described as the Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) between the 15-minute planar images (referred to as A and B images at 60 and 180 minutes). The RMSD is calculated as the square root of the mean squared deviation from zero.
Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipDay 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes and 180 minutes.The stability of the mean/variance relationship, which is assessed by comparing the Coefficient of Variation (CV) of TUVjoint and TUVglobal in subjects with active RA and in healthy control subjects at 60 and 180 minutes.
Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyImaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and at 5 weeks after new therapy initiation; Assessment of CDAI and ACR Response Criteria at 12 and 24 weeks after new therapy initiation.The Kendall rank correlation of the change in global TUV from baseline to 5 weeks (ΔTUVglobal\[5w\]) and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w).• The Kendall rank correlation of ΔTUVglobal\[5w\] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy from baseline to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks defined by ACR Response Criteria (ΔACR12w and ΔACR24w)
Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVImaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and Day 8Longitudinal (8-day) variation of TUV analyzed for each DAS28 joint, defined as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and 95% confidence interval for the RMSD for each joint at Day 0 vs Day 8

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative Evaluations of SPECT/CT as an Indication of Bone Involvement Rather Than Localization Within the Synovial Space in the Hands and Wrists of Arm 2 SubjectsA SPECT/CT scan was performed at approximately 210 minutes after the tilmanocept injection on Day 8 of the trial.Percent of Arm 2 subjects who had SPECT/CT scans who were determined to have bone involvement rather than localization within the synovial space of the hands and wrists
Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)Images were obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0. New anti-TNFα therapy was initiated after completion of Day 0 procedures. CDAI and ACR were assessed on Day 0 and again 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of new anti-TNFα therapy.The correlation of the TUVglobal\[baseline\] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline (CFB) of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w, respectively) and by ACR Response Criteria (ACR12w and ACR24w, respectively).
Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointImages obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0.The normal range of tilmanocept uptake values (TUVs) in hand and wrist joints of healthy control subjects, expressed as the mean and standard deviation. TUV is defined as the average pixel intensity of the region of interest (hand or wrist joint) divided by the average pixel intensity of the reference region (includes the region from one wrist region of interest diameter above the wrist region of interest down to the fingertips)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease
Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
44
RA Subjects on Stable Therapy
Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
41
RA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy
Arm 3 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who were candidates for new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 assessed the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface.
31
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyMissed visit010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation011
Overall StudySubject withdrew due to death in family010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseRA Subjects on Stable TherapyRA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα TherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
44 Participants31 Participants22 Participants97 Participants
Age, Continuous36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.98
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.19
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.68
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.28
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants3 Participants15 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants38 Participants16 Participants85 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
17 Participants11 Participants2 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants23 Participants28 Participants75 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
44 participants41 participants31 participants116 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants34 Participants25 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants7 Participants6 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 440 / 410 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 448 / 419 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 440 / 412 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy

The Kendall rank correlation of the change in global TUV from baseline to 5 weeks (ΔTUVglobal\[5w\]) and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w).• The Kendall rank correlation of ΔTUVglobal\[5w\] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy from baseline to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks defined by ACR Response Criteria (ΔACR12w and ΔACR24w)

Time frame: Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and at 5 weeks after new therapy initiation; Assessment of CDAI and ACR Response Criteria at 12 and 24 weeks after new therapy initiation.

Population: All Arm 3 subjects with data at the specified timepoint (Week 12 or Week 24)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 1-0.267 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 2-0.186 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 10.051 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 20.070 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 10.248 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 1-0.057 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 2-0.032 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 10.025 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 20.083 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 1-0.032 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (HAQ-DI Score) - Reader 20.051 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 20.238 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 10.115 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 20.121 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 10.165 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 20.154 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 10.226 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 20.235 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 10.119 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 20.138 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 10.161 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 20.194 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 1-0.199 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 2-0.110 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 10.110 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 20.105 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 1-0.125 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 2-0.121 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 10.299 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 20.261 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 10.137 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to TherapyΔTUVglobal[5w] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 20.115 Kendall rank correlation
Primary

Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV

The camera-specific precision of TUVjoint in subjects with active RA and Healthy Controls (HCs), which is described as the Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) between the 15-minute planar images (referred to as A and B images at 60 and 180 minutes). The RMSD is calculated as the square root of the mean squared deviation from zero.

Time frame: Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes (60A) and 75 minutes (60B) and at 180 minutes (180A) and 195 minutes (180B).

Population: Planned interim analysis of first 15 subjects in Arms 1 and 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.064 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.090 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.097 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.110 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.094 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.097 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.058 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.068 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.159 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.080 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.091 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.067 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.071 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.078 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.050 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.090 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.057 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.050 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.087 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.077 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.062 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.085 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.089 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.079 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.084 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.097 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.058 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.083 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.048 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.103 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.124 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.076 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight wrist 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.070 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.065 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.077 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.086 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.119 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.056 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.096 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.048 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.086 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.087 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.080 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.163 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.125 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.130 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.070 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.080 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.066 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.099 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.077 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.043 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.086 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.083 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.165 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.152 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.069 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.062 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.095 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.070 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.059 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.095 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.111 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight wrist 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.097 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.113 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.167 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.097 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.106 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.114 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.067 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B0.124 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.106 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.075 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.131 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.083 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.073 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.137 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.109 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.184 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.138 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.105 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.078 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.107 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.088 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.125 Pixel intensity
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B0.099 Pixel intensity
Primary

Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship

The stability of the mean/variance relationship, which is assessed by comparing the Coefficient of Variation (CV) of TUVjoint and TUVglobal in subjects with active RA and in healthy control subjects at 60 and 180 minutes.

Time frame: Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes and 180 minutes.

Population: Planned interim analysis of first 15 subjects in Arms 1 and 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min15.155009 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min21.20135 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min12.819593 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min17.553684 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min17.847881 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min17.407371 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min14.424961 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft wrist TUV at 60 min14.401304 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min13.628956 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min19.774959 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min20.228576 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min18.728588 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min19.283062 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min14.308134 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min18.710387 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipGlobal TUV at 60 min263.31 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min16.92295 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min19.613096 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min18.651035 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min18.511573 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight wrist TUV at 180 min16.823037 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min14.969821 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min18.369256 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min18.873772 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight wrist TUV at 60 min13.05914 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipGlobal TUV at 180 min355.82 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min19.4363 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min21.914899 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min24.269644 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min23.438328 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min21.045602 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min18.335106 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min19.144279 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min16.707115 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min20.968296 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft wrist TUV at 180 min17.46611 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min18.333323 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min19.876281 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min19.314268 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min21.176376 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min21.480266 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min16.290041 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min18.330801 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min17.515896 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min20.621393 Coefficient of variation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min18.927298 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min16.805949 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min13.970308 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min12.16714 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min12.21378 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight wrist TUV at 60 min10.202857 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min11.370952 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min11.916304 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min9.7087077 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipGlobal TUV at 180 min287.80 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min12.604637 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft wrist TUV at 180 min10.10065 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min15.660407 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min12.081512 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min10.066291 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min13.444692 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft wrist TUV at 60 min8.7901247 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min19.814146 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min11.48462 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min12.726762 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min18.014491 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min15.786226 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min23.49369 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min16.172441 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min18.207621 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min17.776583 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 60 min12.958136 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min16.017255 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min11.080537 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min14.647724 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min10.408102 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipGlobal TUV at 60 min208.79 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 1 TUV at 180 min15.40672 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 1 TUV at 60 min13.189704 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min19.791295 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min20.477108 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 180 min10.324402 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft metacarpophalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min16.378147 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min10.748883 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 180 min11.347808 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight wrist TUV at 180 min10.559086 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 2 TUV at 60 min12.508548 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight metacarpophalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min18.332795 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 3 TUV at 60 min12.831644 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipLeft proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 180 min11.384086 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 4 TUV at 60 min16.271218 Coefficient of variation
RA Subjects on Stable TherapyArms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance RelationshipRight proximal interphalangeal 5 TUV at 180 min14.872591 Coefficient of variation
Primary

Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV

Longitudinal (8-day) variation of TUV analyzed for each DAS28 joint, defined as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and 95% confidence interval for the RMSD for each joint at Day 0 vs Day 8

Time frame: Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and Day 8

Population: All Arm 2 subjects with evaluable images at Days 0 and 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.288 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.081 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.135 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.151 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.221 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.179 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.235 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.263 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.198 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.172 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.229 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.233 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.107 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.142 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.134 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.131 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.208 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.213 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.221 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.227 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.212 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.261 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.244 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Anterior view0.078 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.180 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.170 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.148 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.130 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.180 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.346 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.245 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.160 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.202 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.242 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.106 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.137 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.120 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.124 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.159 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.165 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.237 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.172 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.219 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.271 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Anterior view0.084 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.251 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.229 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.225 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.224 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.357 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.303 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.254 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.251 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.240 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.313 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.180 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.214 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.143 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.188 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.247 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.307 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.253 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.221 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.246 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.367 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 1, Posterior view0.133 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.112 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.112 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.105 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.109 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.152 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.227 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.133 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.183 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.205 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.281 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVLeft wrist, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.081 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.149 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.141 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.132 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.137 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.165 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view1.834 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.178 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.199 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.200 Pixel intensity
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseLongitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUVRight proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at Day 0 vs Day 8, Reader 2, Posterior view0.215 Pixel intensity
Secondary

Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint

The normal range of tilmanocept uptake values (TUVs) in hand and wrist joints of healthy control subjects, expressed as the mean and standard deviation. TUV is defined as the average pixel intensity of the region of interest (hand or wrist joint) divided by the average pixel intensity of the reference region (includes the region from one wrist region of interest diameter above the wrist region of interest down to the fingertips)

Time frame: Images obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0.

Population: Healthy control subjects with evaluable scans. Unevaluable scans included those with poor hand placement/positioning and low signal (overlapping with background) in most of the fingers.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 10.80 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.161
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 10.80 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.144
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 11.01 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.213
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 21.20 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.257
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 11.05 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.185
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 21.33 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.2
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 10.85 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.169
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 20.92 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.18
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 10.86 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.158
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 21.00 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.17
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 10.79 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.158
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 20.90 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.197
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 10.86 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.186
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 21.04 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.174
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 10.77 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.192
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 20.90 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.201
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 21.01 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.161
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 10.73 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.186
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 20.82 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.189
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 10.80 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.162
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 20.92 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.169
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 10.75 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.158
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 20.89 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.192
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 10.79 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.175
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 20.93 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.166
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 10.71 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.17
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 20.77 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.179
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 10.68 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.129
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 20.79 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.155
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 10.70 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.184
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 20.73 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.192
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 10.69 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.126
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 20.82 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.146
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 10.66 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.143
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 20.72 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.167
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 10.64 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.128
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 20.75 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.156
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 10.59 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.147
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 20.66 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.141
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 10.59 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.124
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 20.69 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.135
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 11.32 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.229
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 21.48 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.243
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 11.40 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.183
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointLeft Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 21.66 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.18
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 10.98 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.185
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 21.17 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.244
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 11.04 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.19
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 21.29 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.297
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 10.87 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.18
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 20.88 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.181
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 10.94 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.206
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 21.00 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.182
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 10.83 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.176
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 20.91 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.191
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 10.86 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.143
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 21.02 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.189
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 10.83 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.214
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 20.94 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.216
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 10.83 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.141
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 21.02 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.199
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 10.74 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.174
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 20.86 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.212
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 10.78 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.156
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Metacarpophalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 20.96 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.2
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 10.79 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.162
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Anterior View, Reader 20.89 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.198
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 1, Posterior View, Reader 20.95 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.155
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 10.68 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.14
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Anterior View, Reader 20.75 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.159
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 10.73 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.114
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 2, Posterior View, Reader 20.79 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.129
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 10.66 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.164
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Anterior View, Reader 20.73 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.183
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 10.71 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.118
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 11.35 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.221
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 3, Posterior View, Reader 20.80 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.139
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 10.67 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.196
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Anterior View, Reader 20.73 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.172
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 10.65 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.132
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 4, Posterior View, Reader 20.73 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.142
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 10.58 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.141
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Anterior View, Reader 20.66 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.135
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 10.55 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.093
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Proximal Interphalangeal 5, Posterior View, Reader 20.66 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.122
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Wrist, Anterior View, Reader 21.51 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.253
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 11.41 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.188
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjointRight Wrist, Posterior View, Reader 21.65 Pixel intensityStandard Deviation 0.264
Secondary

Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)

The correlation of the TUVglobal\[baseline\] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline (CFB) of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w, respectively) and by ACR Response Criteria (ACR12w and ACR24w, respectively).

Time frame: Images were obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0. New anti-TNFα therapy was initiated after completion of Day 0 procedures. CDAI and ACR were assessed on Day 0 and again 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of new anti-TNFα therapy.

Population: All Arm 3 subjects with data at the specified timepoint (Week 12 or Week 24)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 1-0.070 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 1-0.045 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 10.072 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 1-0.100 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 1-0.067 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 1-0.086 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 10.130 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 1-0.176 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 1-0.261 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 1-0.099 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 1-0.062 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 1-0.096 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 10.121 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 10.057 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI12w (overall) - Reader 2-0.029 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔCDAI24w (overall) - Reader 20.109 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 2-0.073 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Swollen Joint Count) - Reader 2-0.025 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 2-0.057 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Tender Joint Count) - Reader 20.175 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (ESR) - Reader 2-0.145 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (ESR) - Reader 2-0.234 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 2-0.110 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (VAS Pain Scale) - Reader 2-0.028 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 2-0.096 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Patient's Global Assessment) - Reader 2-0.038 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR12w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 20.110 Kendall rank correlation
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseArm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy)TUVglobal[baseline] and ΔACR24w (Physician's Global Assessment) - Reader 20.064 Kendall rank correlation
Secondary

Qualitative Evaluations of SPECT/CT as an Indication of Bone Involvement Rather Than Localization Within the Synovial Space in the Hands and Wrists of Arm 2 Subjects

Percent of Arm 2 subjects who had SPECT/CT scans who were determined to have bone involvement rather than localization within the synovial space of the hands and wrists

Time frame: A SPECT/CT scan was performed at approximately 210 minutes after the tilmanocept injection on Day 8 of the trial.

Population: All Arm 2 subjects who received SPECT/CT scan

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Subjects Free of Inflammatory DiseaseQualitative Evaluations of SPECT/CT as an Indication of Bone Involvement Rather Than Localization Within the Synovial Space in the Hands and Wrists of Arm 2 Subjects0 Percent of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026