Skip to content

Waterjet Prostate Ablation

Image-guided Robot-assisted Waterjet Ablation of the Prostate for Patients With Retention of Urine Due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03938194
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-05-06
Start date
2019-04-25
Completion date
2021-10-21
Last updated
2022-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Brief summary

Introduction Men with enlarged prostates commonly experience lower urinary tract symptoms and may go on to develop complications such as acute urinary retention (AUR). Surgery is the standard treatment option required to remove the enlarged prostates and to rectify such complications. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was first performed over 80 years ago and is still regarded as the gold standard for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) in prostates between 30 and 80ml. While TURP results in an improvement in symptoms, perioperative morbidity and long-term complications can include postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence, urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction. Aquablation, a novel minimally invasive water ablation therapy combining image guidance and robotics (AQUABEAM®, Procept BioRobotics, Redwood Shores, CA, USA) for the targeted and heatfree removal of prostate tissue is one of the efforts in the development of new technology in recent years to replicate the effectiveness of TURP and at the same time with an improved safety profile. In this study, investigators plan to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Aquablation in the management of AUR secondary to BPE. Method 20 participants are expected in this study. After patients consent to participate in the study, they will go through Aquablation under general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia. The ablation is delivered by transurethral means. After the procedure, subject is expected to go home on the following day. Subject will be assessed 3 months and 6 months after the procedure. Follow-up assessment includes blood tests, prostate ultrasound and urodynamic study.

Detailed description

Benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) is a non-malignant growth of the prostate gland that can lead to a range of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and in some cases eventually leading to retention of urine. In patients failing to wean off catheter after retention of urine due to BPE, surgical intervention is the standard treatment. Surgical intervention options have evolved from electrosurgical resection to the use of lasers for enucleation and ablation. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was first performed over 80 years ago and is still regarded as the gold standard for the treatment of BPE in prostates between 30 and 80ml. While TURP results in a statistically significant improvement in symptoms score and and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), perioperative morbidity and long-term complications can include postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence, urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction. Aquablation, a novel minimally invasive water ablation therapy combining image guidance and robotics (AQUABEAM®, Procept BioRobotics, Redwood Shores, CA, USA) for the targeted and heat-free removal of prostate tissue is one of the efforts in the development of new technology in recent years to replicate the effectiveness of TURP and at the same time with an improved safety profile. Safety and feasibility of Aquablation in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been proven successful in both canine model and human. Since then, two other prospective non-randomized trials demonstrated that the surgical ablation of the prostate using Aquablation had achieved significant and immediate improvement of functional voiding parameters as well as symptomatic improvement. Two randomized controlled trials comparing Aquablation against TURP found that Aquablation had produced a similar improvement in LUTS as TURP, with a better side-effect profile. AQUABEAM® is currently a FDA approved equipment for the ablation of prostate tissue. It is being used in US as well as in Europe and New Zealand. So far, all studies focused on the application of Aquablation in patients with LUTS only secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In this study, investigators plan to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Aquablation in the management of another facet of BPH, which is retention of urine.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAquablation

a novel minimally invasive water ablation therapy combining image guidance and robotics for the targeted and heat-free removal of prostate tissue

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Retention of urine refractory to medical treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with active urinary tract infection * Patients with bleeding disorder or on anti-coagulation * Patients with bladder pathology including bladder stone and bladder cancer * Patients with urethral stricture * Patients with neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities * Patients with previous nonpharmacological prostate treatment, * Prostate cancer * Fail to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wean off CatheterPost operation 3 days% success in weaning off catheter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication ratePost operation 30 daysComplications rate after study intervention
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire total ScorePost operation 3 months & 6 monthsChange in total scores in International Prostate Symptom Score (ranges from 0 to 35) questionnaires
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire QoL ScorePost operation 3 months & 6 monthsChange in quality of life assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire (ranges from 0 to 6)
Change in urodynamic in flowratePost operation 3 monthsFunctional outcome 1: change in urodynamic function assessed by Uroflowmetry
Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) questionnaire total scorePost operation 3 months & 6 monthsChange in total score in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score questionnaire (ranges from 0 - 15)
Pain ScorePost operation day 1 & 3 monthsPost-treatment pain score ranges from 1 to 10
Change in urodynamic in cystometryPost operation 6 monthsFunctional outcome 2: change in urodynamic function assessed by cystometrogram (CMG)
International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire scorePost operation 3 months & 6 monthsChange in International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire score (ranges from 0 to 25)

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026