Skip to content

Effects of Echo-optimization of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Functional Capacity (VAFRACT)

The Effects of Echo-optimization of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Functional Capacity, a RAndomized Controlled Trial (VAFRACT)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03937570
Acronym
VAFRACT
Enrollment
27
Registered
2019-05-03
Start date
2018-02-08
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2021-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

left ventricular assist device, echo-optimization, functional capacity, cardiopulmonary exercise test

Brief summary

After the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), many patients continue to experience exercise intolerance. LVAD echo guided optimization (EO) determines a more favorable hemodynamic profile and could provide an improvement on functional capacity (FC). VAFRACT is a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the additional benefit of an EO approach on FC, measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), in LVAD optimization free population.

Detailed description

The use of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) is a viable therapeutic option to improve survival and quality of life of patients with advanced and refractory heart failure (HF). However, after the implantation of an LVAD, patients' functional capacity (FC) is still reduced with maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) values calculated at the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) ranging from 11 to 20 ml/kg/min. LVAD echo guided optimization (EO) determines a more favorable hemodynamic profile, in particular for the right ventricle, and could provide an improvement on FC. VAFRACT is a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the additional benefit of an EO approach on FC, measured by CPET in LVAD optimization free population. The optimal device speed is defined as the one that allows an intermittent aortic valve opening and a neutral position of the interventricular septum without increasing aortic or tricuspid regurgitation associated or not to a dilatation of the right ventricle (RV). In this condition it is reasonable to expect a more favorable hemodynamic profile for the RV and a better response in terms of functional capacity. Subjects studied are HF patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD: HeartMate II (Thoratec Inc., Pleasanton, CA) and HeartMate 3 (HM 3, Abbott, North Chicago, IL). Patients are recruited from our Day Hospital of the Cardiac Surgery Department at the University Hospital of Verona.

Interventions

DEVICEecho-optimization

LVAD echo-optimization consists of routine comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography at the baseline speed setting, followed by stepwise incremental adjustments to the LVAD speed (revolutions per minute: rpm), with collection of prespecified echocardiographic parameters at each new speed (eg, left ventricle end-diastolic diameter, interventricular septal position, aortic valve opening frequency/duration, tricuspid and/or mitral regurgitation severity). The optimal velocity is defined as the one that allows an intermittent aortic valve opening and a neutral position of the interventricular septum without increasing aortic or tricuspid regurgitation, associated or not to a dilatation of the right ventricle. The recommended speed range varies according to the indications given in the data sheet for each specific device.

Sponsors

Universita di Verona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* at least 3 months after LVAD implantation; * compliance to the required follow-up schedule; * age 18 or above or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national laws.

Exclusion criteria

* distance of less than 150 meters on the six-minute walk test (6MWT) or impossibility to perform CPET * recent finding of any major device-related complication (sepsis, thrombosis …).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VO2 Peakthree monthspeak oxygen uptake measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CPET Exercise TimeThree monthsCardiopulmonary exercise time
Number of Participants With LVAD-related HospitalizationsThree monthsRate of hospitalizations for: device thrombosis, hemorrhagic events, infections, right heart failure, arrhythmias.
QoL: The EQ-5D QuestionnaireThree monthsChanges in quality of life perceived by EuroQoL (quality of life) Scale. It is an instrument which evaluates the quality of life measuring with one question: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The answers given to these question (1 = no problems; 2 = some problems; 3 = extreme problems) are converted into EQ-5D index, an utility scores anchored at 0 for death and 1 for perfect health. The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), by which respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
Nt-proBNPThree monthsNt-proBNP levels
Right Ventricular FunctionThree monthsFractional area change of right ventricle assessed by echocardiography

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EO GROUP
Patients underwent LVAD echo-optimization; the optimal device speed is confirmed at the end of procedure. echo-optimization: LVAD echo-optimization consists of routine comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography at the baseline speed setting, followed by stepwise incremental adjustments to the LVAD speed (revolutions per minute: rpm), with collection of prespecified echocardiographic parameters at each new speed (eg, left ventricle end-diastolic diameter, interventricular septal position, aortic valve opening frequency/duration, tricuspid and/or mitral regurgitation severity). The optimal velocity is defined as the one that allows an intermittent aortic valve opening and a neutral position of the interventricular septum without increasing aortic or tricuspid regurgitation, associated or not to a dilatation of the right ventricle. The recommended speed range varies according to the indications given in the data sheet for each specific device.
13
CONTROL GROUP
Patients underwent LVAD echo-optimization, but the optimal device speed is not confirmed at the end of procedure.
14
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEO GROUPCONTROL GROUPTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Age, Continuous60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants00 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
VO2 peak13.2 mL/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
13.8 mL/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
13.5 mL/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

VO2 Peak

peak oxygen uptake measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test

Time frame: three months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EO GROUPVO2 PeakBASELINE13.2 mL/Kg/minStandard Deviation 2.5
EO GROUPVO2 Peak3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP14.2 mL/Kg/minStandard Deviation 2.5
CONTROL GROUPVO2 PeakBASELINE13.8 mL/Kg/minStandard Deviation 2.4
CONTROL GROUPVO2 Peak3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP13.2 mL/Kg/minStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

CPET Exercise Time

Cardiopulmonary exercise time

Time frame: Three months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EO GROUPCPET Exercise TimeBASELINE490 secondsStandard Deviation 98
EO GROUPCPET Exercise Time3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP526 secondsStandard Deviation 116
CONTROL GROUPCPET Exercise Time3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP499 secondsStandard Deviation 107
CONTROL GROUPCPET Exercise TimeBASELINE504 secondsStandard Deviation 103
Secondary

Nt-proBNP

Nt-proBNP levels

Time frame: Three months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EO GROUPNt-proBNPBASELINE1743 ng/LStandard Deviation 1453
EO GROUPNt-proBNP3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP1484 ng/LStandard Deviation 1251
CONTROL GROUPNt-proBNPBASELINE1759 ng/LStandard Deviation 1154
CONTROL GROUPNt-proBNP3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP1538 ng/LStandard Deviation 1020
Secondary

Number of Participants With LVAD-related Hospitalizations

Rate of hospitalizations for: device thrombosis, hemorrhagic events, infections, right heart failure, arrhythmias.

Time frame: Three months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EO GROUPNumber of Participants With LVAD-related Hospitalizations0 Participants
CONTROL GROUPNumber of Participants With LVAD-related Hospitalizations0 Participants
Secondary

QoL: The EQ-5D Questionnaire

Changes in quality of life perceived by EuroQoL (quality of life) Scale. It is an instrument which evaluates the quality of life measuring with one question: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The answers given to these question (1 = no problems; 2 = some problems; 3 = extreme problems) are converted into EQ-5D index, an utility scores anchored at 0 for death and 1 for perfect health. The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), by which respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).

Time frame: Three months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EO GROUPQoL: The EQ-5D QuestionnaireBASELINE0.796 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
EO GROUPQoL: The EQ-5D Questionnaire3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP0.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
CONTROL GROUPQoL: The EQ-5D QuestionnaireBASELINE0.804 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
CONTROL GROUPQoL: The EQ-5D Questionnaire3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Right Ventricular Function

Fractional area change of right ventricle assessed by echocardiography

Time frame: Three months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EO GROUPRight Ventricular FunctionBASELINE36.5 percentage of fractional area changeStandard Deviation 3.8
EO GROUPRight Ventricular Function3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP36.8 percentage of fractional area changeStandard Deviation 3.2
CONTROL GROUPRight Ventricular FunctionBASELINE35.8 percentage of fractional area changeStandard Deviation 4.1
CONTROL GROUPRight Ventricular Function3 MONTHS-FOLLOW UP35.7 percentage of fractional area changeStandard Deviation 4.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026