Skip to content

Comparison of a Novel Transperineal Targeted Fusion Biopsy System to Conventional Transrectal Targeted Fusion Biopsy

Comparison of a Novel Transperineal Targeted Fusion Biopsy System to Conventional Transrectal Targeted Fusion Biopsy for Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers and to Eliminate Post-procedure Related Infections: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03936127
Enrollment
360
Registered
2019-05-03
Start date
2022-10-11
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2022-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Transperineal, Transrectal, Fusion Biopsy

Brief summary

This study is designed as a randomized control trial which intends to determine if transperineal (TP) targeted biopsy is not inferior to transrectal (TR) targeted biopsy for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer while comparing post-procedural infection rates between the two techniques. The study will also look to compare patient reported pain scores related to the procedure, rates of other minor complications (e.g. bleeding, urinary retention) and procedure time. The expected sample size at The Ottawa Hospital is 360 men.

Detailed description

Patients undergo mp-MRI, at the discretion of the treating Urologist, when they are referred to the Cancer Assessment Clinic for their initial visit with a risk factor for prostate cancer (e.g. abnormal digital rectal exam \[DRE\] or elevated prostate serum antigen \[PSA\] level). Performing an mp-MRI in a man with risk factors for prostate cancer prior to an initial biopsy has become the standard of care for diagnosis of prostate cancer based on two large multi-center randomized control trials. At the second visit, which is standard of care, the Urologist (or delegate \[Resident, Fellow\]) will discuss targeted biopsy and will introduce the trial design obtaining informed consent to participate. If consent is obtained, the patient will be randomly assigned to receive either the standard transrectal (TR) ultrasound guided targeted fusion biopsy or the novel transperineal (TP) targeted fusion biopsy system which has also been preliminarily validated as being accurate for detection of significant prostate cancers at targeted biopsy. Patients will be notified regarding which method of targeted biopsy will be employed at time of scheduling. Both the TR and TP biopsies will be conducted in existing biopsy rooms in The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) and will employ a brief 30-minute post-procedural observation period at which point the patient is required to urinate prior to discharge. Level of pain will be recorded by the ultrasound technologists during the 30 minutes observation period as well. This study aims to compare ultrasound guided transrectal and transperineal targeted fusion biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer in abnormalities detected on MRI for the purpose of reducing or completely eliminating the risk of serious infection associated with the transrectal approach.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy

Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy

Sponsors

The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Dr. Nicola Schieda
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* MRI positive - abnormal area detected * Patient re-evaluated in the TOH Prostate CAC (Cancer Assessment Centre) for planning of targeted biopsy * Signed Consent

Exclusion criteria

* MRI negative - no abnormal area detected * Patient with a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer enrolled in active surveillance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection RatePatients who have undergone biopsy of the prostate will be seen by their Urologist in routine clinical follow-up, typically in 4-6 weeks, as per standard of care.Number of patients with or without post-procedural infection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinically Significant Prostate CancerPatients who have undergone biopsy of the prostate will be seen by their Urologist in routine clinical follow-up, typically in 4-6 weeks, as per standard of care.Gleason score of tumor in biopsy samples containing cancer.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactNicola Schieda, MD
nschieda@toh.ca613-759-0958
Backup ContactBetty Anne Schwarz, PhD
baschwarz@toh.ca613-798-5555

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026