Risk Reduction
Conditions
Keywords
PrEP, women, Kenya, adherence, POC monitoring, urine test,TDF, immunoassay
Brief summary
Worldwide expansion of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) will be critical to ending the HIV epidemic. However, maintaining daily adherence to PrEP can be difficult and the accuracy of self-reported adherence is often limited by social desirability bias. Pharmacologic adherence monitoring (measuring drug levels in a biomatrix) has been critical to the interpretation of the PrEP trials, but testing usually requires expensive equipment and skilled personnel. We have recently developed a point-of-care (POC) immunoassay to measure tenofovir in urine, allowing real-time adherence monitoring for the first time. We now want to test the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary impact of monitoring adherence in real-time using this novel POC assay with adherence feedback provided to the patient with supportive messaging (versus standard of care adherence counseling).
Detailed description
The study is a pilot randomized trial to test the acceptability to participants, feasibility for providers, and impact on long-term metric of adherence among participants (assessed via tenofovir hair levels) of implementing a POC urine tenofovir test to provide real-time adherence feedback and enhanced adherence counseling among women on PrEP in Thika, Kenya. Eligible women (n=100) will be HIV-negative, ≥18 years old, and on PrEP. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention of providing real-time feedback via the urine assay versus standard-of-care adherence counseling. Acceptability will be assessed by a quantitative survey of participants at the end of the study, as well as by qualitative data collected via in-depth interviews (n=20) and focus group discussions (n=4 groups of 5-10 women each). Feasibility will be assessed by the proportion of women retained in the study, the mean number of missed visits, the proportion of planned urine assessments completed and messages delivered, while in-depth interviews with providers will explore the ease of administering the urine test. Tenofovir levels in hair serve as the long-term metric of adherence. Feasibility outcome: The investigators will assess the feasibility of the intervention by interviewing health care providers, who will be administering this test at the clinical point of care in the future. The investigators will examine provider perceptions of the assay using in-depth interviews. These key informant interviews will be performed at the end of this study with the healthcare providers (up to 8) who delivered the counseling messages to intervention arm participants after performing the POC urine TFV test. The semi-structured interview guide will draw from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model.200 This model incorporates factors that influence technology acceptance (in this case, of the POC immunoassay): perceived usefulness (performance expectancy), complexity to use (effort expectancy), stigma/social harm (social influence), and benefits (facilitating PrEP adherence among patients). These interviews will also elicit barriers and facilitators to delivering the TFV assay-informed counseling messages. Acceptability outcome: The investigators will conduct a mixed-methods assessment of the intervention arm participants' experiences with real-time monitoring and feedback at the end of the study. A quantitative survey and a qualitative interview guide for in-depth interviews of participants will draw from the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills (IMB) model.205-212 Quantitative data collection will occur via standardized interviewer-administered questionnaires. Items to be assessed include the following: 1) Feelings about receiving their PrEP adherence results in real time; 2) Likelihood of participating in other studies using a similar design; 3) Likelihood of wanting to receive results of urine testing outside of a study while they are on PrEP; 4) Concern about the privacy and security of the data regarding their urine results; 5) Grading of the potential impact of knowing their urine TFV results on subsequent medication adherence; 6) Advantages and disadvantages of being told about their adherence in real time; 7) Likelihood of taking PrEP just before later study visits because they knew the urine test was being conducted; 8) Preferences regarding a yes/no assay versus an assay that provides information on high, moderate or low adherence. A 5-point Likert item format will be used to assess graded items (such as the likelihood of wanting continued urine testing in the context of PrEP; feelings about the urine testing, ranging from negative to positive; concerns about privacy, ranging from low to high; the potential impact of real-time feedback on subsequent adherence, ranging from low to high). Other items (advantages and disadvantages of being told about adherence results) will provide pre-specified options with one other option for open-ended text fields. Adherence outcome: A linear mixed effects linear regression model will estimate the effect of the intervention versus standard-of-care on logarithmically transformed levels of tenofovir in hair.
Interventions
Collect urine on intervention participants and screen for presence of TFV. Feedback will be provided to the participant based on the results on their adherence with provision of standard adherence counseling.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Pilot Randomized Trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Female * Adult, age ≥18 years old * HIV-1 uninfected based on a negative HIV-1 rapid test * Not currently enrolled in an HIV-1 prevention clinical trial * Not currently in a sero-discordant relationship * Already taking PrEP and will be enrolled at the 3-month follow-up visit following PrEP initiation * Willing to be randomized to point-of-care tenofovir drug testing * Willing/able to provide informed consent to participate in the study * No contraindication to use of TDF or FTC * Note: Women who are pregnant or breast feeding at screening/enrollment are still eligible
Exclusion criteria
* HIV positive women * under 18 years old
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term Adherence Metrics Via Hair Concentrations of Tenofovir and Short-term Adherence Metric of Urine Concentrations of Tenofovir. | 12 months for each participant from the time of enrollment | Primary outcome is number of participants in each arm with detectable hair concentrations of Tenofovir indicating long-term adherence at 12 months (undetectable levels defined long-term non-adherence), as well as urine concentrations of Tenofovir at 12 months as a short-term adherence metric. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility Among Healthcare Providers of Providing Test Feedback to Participants | Completed after the participants' 12-month follow-up visit | Themes among PrEP providers about feasibility of providing urine assay feedback to study participants on PrEP. The In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were cross-sectional. |
Countries
Kenya
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Partners in Health and Research Development (PHRD) clinical research center at Thika. This center is associated with 5 five community sites from which participants were recruited for the study including surrounding voluntary counselling and testing centers, churches, and community organizations. Participants on PrEP for the last 3 months were recruited. Study began recruiting from March 1, 2021.
Pre-assignment details
105 women were assessed for eligibility and 5 were found ineligible because 4 were unavailable for study procedures and 1 was underage. 100 participants were enrolled and 49 were assigned to urine test counselling and 51 assigned to standard of care procedures.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Arm POC adherence testing by a urine TFV assay with feedback
PUMA: Collect urine on intervention participants and screen for presence of TFV. Feedback will be provided to the participant based on the results on their adherence with provision of standard adherence counseling. | 49 |
| Standard of Care Follow Kenya's PrEP guidelines on standard adherence counselling | 51 |
| Total | 100 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Standard of Care | Total | Intervention Arm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 51 Participants | 100 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 33.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 | 33.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 | 33.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 51 Participants | 100 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Kenya | 51 participants | 100 participants | 49 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 51 Participants | 100 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 49 | 0 / 51 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 49 | 0 / 51 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 49 | 0 / 51 |
Outcome results
Long-term Adherence Metrics Via Hair Concentrations of Tenofovir and Short-term Adherence Metric of Urine Concentrations of Tenofovir.
Primary outcome is number of participants in each arm with detectable hair concentrations of Tenofovir indicating long-term adherence at 12 months (undetectable levels defined long-term non-adherence), as well as urine concentrations of Tenofovir at 12 months as a short-term adherence metric.
Time frame: 12 months for each participant from the time of enrollment
Population: Adult women not in sero-discordant partnerships were enrolled 3 months after PrEP initiation at the Kenya Medical Research Institute.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUMA Intervention Arm | Long-term Adherence Metrics Via Hair Concentrations of Tenofovir and Short-term Adherence Metric of Urine Concentrations of Tenofovir. | Detectable Tenofovir in hair indicating long-term adherence | 33 Participants |
| PUMA Intervention Arm | Long-term Adherence Metrics Via Hair Concentrations of Tenofovir and Short-term Adherence Metric of Urine Concentrations of Tenofovir. | Detectable Tenofovir in urine indicating short-term adherence | 31 Participants |
| PUMA Standard of Care | Long-term Adherence Metrics Via Hair Concentrations of Tenofovir and Short-term Adherence Metric of Urine Concentrations of Tenofovir. | Detectable Tenofovir in hair indicating long-term adherence | 26 Participants |
| PUMA Standard of Care | Long-term Adherence Metrics Via Hair Concentrations of Tenofovir and Short-term Adherence Metric of Urine Concentrations of Tenofovir. | Detectable Tenofovir in urine indicating short-term adherence | 19 Participants |
Feasibility Among Healthcare Providers of Providing Test Feedback to Participants
Themes among PrEP providers about feasibility of providing urine assay feedback to study participants on PrEP. The In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were cross-sectional.
Time frame: Completed after the participants' 12-month follow-up visit
Population: Healthcare providers who provide PrEP
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUMA Intervention Arm | Feasibility Among Healthcare Providers of Providing Test Feedback to Participants | Easy to Use | 6 Participants |
| PUMA Intervention Arm | Feasibility Among Healthcare Providers of Providing Test Feedback to Participants | Feasible within routine care | 8 Participants |
| PUMA Intervention Arm | Feasibility Among Healthcare Providers of Providing Test Feedback to Participants | Concerned about added workload | 3 Participants |