Skip to content

Study to Confirm Accuracy and Safety of the Inliant Surgical Navigation System

Human Clinical Study to Confirm Accuracy and Safety of the Inliant Surgical Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03934853
Enrollment
53
Registered
2019-05-02
Start date
2018-05-29
Completion date
2019-03-12
Last updated
2019-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partial Edentulism

Brief summary

A confirmatory dual-clinic, non-randomized study of the Inliant device to aid in dental implant placement in humans. The hypothesis is that using the Inliant Surgical Navigation System (Inliant) will provide a high degree of accuracy in multiple dimensions relative to the ideal implant position as determined in the planning stage, and will not result in any adverse outcomes related to use of the device. Five clinicians (Investigators) of various clinical backgrounds and experience will use the Inliant device, a licensed, medical device in Canada, to place a dental implant in a total of twenty (20) subjects.

Detailed description

The long term success of dental implant therapy is largely dependent on proper implant positioning in bone, and the facilitation of a well-functioning prosthesis. Surgical complications from implant placement in an incorrect location can include damage to adjacent teeth, sinus perforations, hemorrhage, buccal plate dehiscence, and nerve damage. In implant therapy, dynamic surgical guidance is a new technology used to facilitate accurate and efficient implant placement, and to aid in communication between the restorative dentist and surgeon. The Inliant device is a dynamic surgical navigation system that is based on passive optical tracking technology. Passive optical tracking is accomplished by having the patient wear a reference body that is identified by an optical tracking system. This information allows the clinician to visualize the surgical drill projected onto a screen, showing its position in 3 dimensions on a CBCT scan of the patient. Dynamic surgical guidance has additional advantages over traditional methods in that it allows for intra-operative changes in implant planning, and allows the clinician to visualize the position of the surgical drill during the procedure. The purpose of the present study is to analyze the accuracy of the Inliant device as a method of placing dental implants in an actual clinical setting and to confirm its safety.

Interventions

DEVICEDynamic Dental Navigation

Aid in dental implant placement in humans

Sponsors

Navigate Surgical Technologies Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provide signed and dated informed consent form (ICF) * Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the study * Male or female, 22 years of age and older * In good general health as evidenced by medical history * To provide attachment of the stent for each implant, there must be at least two adjacent zero mobility teeth anywhere in the same arch on which the surgery is to be performed

Exclusion criteria

* A medical condition, psychological condition or dental condition that would exclude a patient from having dental implant surgery. Example: inability to tolerate local anesthesia or other dental disease conditions that would preclude dental implant surgery. * Use of disallowed concomitant medications (only if a contraindication to dental implant surgery. Examples include long term bisphosphonates, high dose blood thinners, etc.). * Pregnancy * Treatment with another investigational drug or other intervention * Inability to obtain a suitable pre-operative CBCT scan * In surgery, if there are clinical conditions that unexpectedly do not allow for the placement of an implant, e.g. lack of primary stability during immediate placement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of implant placement+/- 7 days of implant procedureUses passive optical tracking technology pre-operatively to plan dental implant placement. Uses the same technology post-operatively for placement comparison assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety assessment through collection of adverse event data+/- 7 days of implant procedureAssessment of safety in a clinical environment as determined by review of adverse events related to the use of the device

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026