Bladder Cancer, Cancer of the Bladder, Recurrent, Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
pragmatic trial, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), urinary bladder neoplasms, urogenital neoplasms, radical cystectomy, neoplasms by site, neoplasms, urinary bladder disease, immunologic factors, caregivers, physiological effects of drugs, immunologic adjuvants, urologic diseases
Brief summary
Bladder cancer is the most common urinary tract cancer and the 5th most common cancer in the US (1). Yet bladder cancer research is underfunded relative to other common cancers. As a result, bladder cancer care is prone to evidence gaps that produce decision uncertainty for both patients and clinicians. The Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options (CISTO) for Bladder Cancer Study has the potential to fill these critical evidence gaps, change care pathways for the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), and provide for personalized, patient-centered care. The purpose of CISTO is to conduct a large prospective study that directly compares the impact of medical management versus bladder removal in recurrent high-grade NMIBC patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) failure on clinical outcomes and patient and caregiver experience using standardized patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Detailed description
Most bladder cancer patients (74%) present with NMIBC where the cancer is limited to the lining or support layer of the bladder. High-grade NMIBC is treated initially with endoscopic resection and intravesical immunotherapy, followed by bladder instillations of BCG. Most patients with high-risk, high-grade NMIBC are able to retain their bladders and avoid more invasive treatments. However, 24-61% of patients will have their cancers recur within 12 months of treatment with BCG (BCG failures), and they have limited treatment options. National guidelines recommend consideration between two alternatives: additional medical management and radical cystectomy (removal of the bladder). Selecting between these options involves weighing the risk of progression of bladder cancer and loss of a window of potential cure versus the risk of morbidity and loss of quality of life (QOL) with bladder removal. This complex decision-making engages patients and their caregivers, who may be impacted by the urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunctions that can occur with NMIBC treatment. The investigators will evaluate this research question on a large scale in real world practice settings including academic and community-based practices and examine patient-centered outcomes. The investigators have engaged stakeholders with diverse perspectives relevant to this research question, including patients, caregivers, national patient advocacy organizations, national medical specialty organizations, guideline developers, health care payers, and industry. By engaging broad expertise relevant to this research question, the investigators will ensure that the study results will help NMIBC patients whose cancer recurs after BCG treatment make more informed decisions that improve the health outcomes that are important to them. CISTO is an observational study that will not affect the treatment that patients chose. Patient surveys will occur at study entry and at follow-up assessments for up to four years. There will also be a qualitative sub-study that will include interviews of approximately 50 patients and 25 caregivers recruited from the observational cohort study.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patient Eligibility, Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult 18 years of age or older; and 2. Presenting with high-grade NMIBC established by anatomic pathology as tumor stage classification Tis, Ta, or T1, and with: 1. Pathology documentation from any hospital/clinic/medical center, and 2. More than 50% urothelial carcinoma component in the specimen 3. History of high-grade NMIBC established by anatomic pathology as tumor stage classification Tis, Ta, or T1; and 4. Attempted or received induction BCG (at least 3 out of 6 instillations) at any point in time; and 5. In the previous 12 months, received at least one instillation of any intravesical agent (induction or maintenance) or one administration of systemic therapy for NMIBC treatment. Patient Eligibility,
Exclusion criteria
1. Any plasmacytoid or small cell (neuroendocrine) component in the pathology (past or current presentation); 2. Previous history of cystectomy or radiation therapy for bladder cancer; 3. Previous history of muscle-invasive bladder cancer or metastatic bladder cancer; 4. Any history of upper tract urothelial carcinoma; 5. Incarcerated in a detention facility or in police custody (patients wearing a monitoring device can be enrolled) at baseline/screening; 6. Contraindication to radical cystectomy (e.g., American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 4, patient not considered a radical cystectomy candidate due to comorbidity); 7. Contraindication to medical therapy (i.e., intolerant of all medical therapies); 8. Unable to provide written informed consent in English; 9. Unable to be contacted for research surveys; 10. Planning to participate in a Phase I or Phase II interventional clinical trial for NMIBC (unless in the control/comparator arm of a Phase II trial) or any blinded interventional trial for NMIBC.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Physical Function Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) | 12 months after enrollment | The primary outcome of patient-reported quality of life is measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Function scale. The scale ranges in score from 0 to 100, with higher function scores indicating better health. Scale score is calculated by transforming individual item scores into a 0 to 1 scale, taking the mean, and multiplying by 100. Each scale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in order to be calculated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Overall Survival | 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on overall survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death. |
| Patient Self-reported Urinary Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Urinary Summary Score | 12 months after enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported urinary health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate the two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required. |
| Patient Self-reported Sexual Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Sexual Summary Score | 12 months after enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported sexual health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required. |
| Patient Self-reported Bowel Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Bowel Summary Score | 12 months after enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported bowel health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required. |
| Patient Self-reported Financial Distress as Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) | 12 months after enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported financial distress, as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). The COST questionnaire consists of 11 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from zero to four. After reversing some items as indicated in the scoring manual (by reversing the sign on the original zero to four score and adding four), all item response scores are summed into a single financial toxicity score ranging from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating greater financial wellbeing. Each subscale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in that subscale in order to be calculated. Item nonresponse is accounted for by substituting the mean of the completed items in the subscale. |
| Patient-reported Anxiety as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a | 12 months after enrollment | The evaluation of patient-reported anxiety, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. |
| Patient-reported Depression as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a | 12 months after enrollment | The evaluation of patient-reported depression, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. |
| Patient-reported Generic Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L | 12 months after enrollment | The evaluation of patient-reported generic quality of life as measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L (EQ-5D). Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. |
| Patient Recurrence-free Survival | 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on recurrence-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (recurrence or death). A recurrence was defined as any subsequent episode of high-grade bladder cancer in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract (penile urethra, prostatic urethra, ureters, renal pelvis), either non-muscle or muscle invasive bladder cancer (for cystectomy arm this excludes any finding at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death. |
| Patient Metastasis-free Survival | 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A metastasis was defined as metastasis to distant lymph/nodes organs (pathologic or radiologic diagnosis of M+ disease) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death. |
| Patient Bladder Cancer-specific Survival | 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on bladder cancer-specific survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death from bladder cancer). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death from bladder cancer. |
| Patient Progression-free Survival | 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment | The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A progression was defined as any subsequent episode of muscle-invasive (T2-T4) disease in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract AND/OR locoregional (true pelvic/common iliac) nodal disease (N+) AND/OR distant metastasis (M+) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of Washington
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who have selected bladder-sparing therapy (BST) | 371 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who have selected radical cystectomy | 199 |
| Total | 570 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 69.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 | 72.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 | 71.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 |
| Age, Customized greater than or equal to 75 years | 62 Participants | 150 Participants | 212 Participants |
| Age, Customized Less than 75 years | 137 Participants | 221 Participants | 358 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 17 Participants | 39 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 182 Participants | 332 Participants | 514 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Partner status Partnered | 170 Participants | 288 Participants | 458 Participants |
| Partner status Unpartnered | 29 Participants | 83 Participants | 112 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 8 Participants | 18 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 184 Participants | 341 Participants | 525 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 39 Participants | 78 Participants | 117 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 160 Participants | 293 Participants | 453 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 19 / 371 | 11 / 199 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 77 / 371 | 73 / 199 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 25 / 371 | 29 / 199 |
Outcome results
Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Physical Function Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Patient-reported quality of life is measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Function scale. The scale ranges in score from 0 to 100, with higher function scores indicating better health. Scale score is calculated by transforming individual item scores into a 0 to 1 scale, taking the mean, and multiplying by 100. Each scale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in order to be calculated.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Physical Function Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Patient-reported quality of life is measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Function scale. The scale ranges in score from 0 to 100, with higher function scores indicating better health. Scale score is calculated by transforming individual item scores into a 0 to 1 scale, taking the mean, and multiplying by 100. Each scale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in order to be calculated.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Physical Function Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The primary outcome of patient-reported quality of life is measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Function scale. The scale ranges in score from 0 to 100, with higher function scores indicating better health. Scale score is calculated by transforming individual item scores into a 0 to 1 scale, taking the mean, and multiplying by 100. Each scale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in order to be calculated.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We performed tenfold multiple imputation (MICE R package) for all missing outcomes and covariates for analyses of all patient-reported outcomes.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Physical Function Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) | 85.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by the Physical Function Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) | 86.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.5 |
Patient Bladder Cancer-specific Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on bladder cancer-specific survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death from bladder cancer). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death from bladder cancer.
Time frame: 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment
Population: All participants who had an electronic health record review or death record at least 12 months after the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Survival times were calculated from the date of recurrence to the event (death from bladder cancer). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death from bladder cancer.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Bladder Cancer-specific Survival | 359 Participants |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Bladder Cancer-specific Survival | 192 Participants |
Patient Bladder Cancer-specific Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on bladder cancer-specific survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death from bladder cancer). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death from bladder cancer.
Time frame: 60 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Bladder Cancer-specific Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on bladder cancer-specific survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death from bladder cancer). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death from bladder cancer.
Time frame: 24 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Metastasis-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A metastasis was defined as metastasis to distant lymph/nodes organs (pathologic or radiologic diagnosis of M+ disease) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 24 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Metastasis-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A metastasis was defined as metastasis to distant lymph/nodes organs (pathologic or radiologic diagnosis of M+ disease) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 60 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Metastasis-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A metastasis was defined as metastasis to distant lymph/nodes organs (pathologic or radiologic diagnosis of M+ disease) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment
Population: All participants who had an electronic health record review or death record at least 12 months after the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Survival times were calculated from the date of recurrence to the event (metastasis or death). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Metastasis-free Survival | 330 Participants |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Metastasis-free Survival | 178 Participants |
Patient Overall Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on overall survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death.
Time frame: 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment
Population: All participants who had an electronic health record review or submitted a survey at least 12 months after the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer or had a death record at any time were included. Participants who did not have an electronic health record review or submit a survey at least 12 months after the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and did not have a death record at any time were excluded.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Overall Survival | 351 Participants |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Overall Survival | 190 Participants |
Patient Overall Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on overall survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death.
Time frame: 24 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Overall Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on overall survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (death). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or date of death.
Time frame: 60 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Progression-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A progression was defined as any subsequent episode of muscle-invasive (T2-T4) disease in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract AND/OR locoregional (true pelvic/common iliac) nodal disease (N+) AND/OR distant metastasis (M+) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 60 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Progression-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A progression was defined as any subsequent episode of muscle-invasive (T2-T4) disease in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract AND/OR locoregional (true pelvic/common iliac) nodal disease (N+) AND/OR distant metastasis (M+) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment
Population: All participants who had an electronic health record review or death record at least 12 months after the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Survival times were calculated from the date of recurrence to the event (progression or death). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Progression-free Survival | 319 Participants |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Progression-free Survival | 141 Participants |
Patient Progression-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on metastasis-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (metastatis or death). A progression was defined as any subsequent episode of muscle-invasive (T2-T4) disease in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract AND/OR locoregional (true pelvic/common iliac) nodal disease (N+) AND/OR distant metastasis (M+) (for cystectomy arm this includes findings at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 24 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Recurrence-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on recurrence-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (recurrence or death). A recurrence was defined as any subsequent episode of high-grade bladder cancer in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract (penile urethra, prostatic urethra, ureters, renal pelvis), either non-muscle or muscle invasive bladder cancer (for cystectomy arm this excludes any finding at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 60 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient Recurrence-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on recurrence-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (recurrence or death). A recurrence was defined as any subsequent episode of high-grade bladder cancer in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract (penile urethra, prostatic urethra, ureters, renal pelvis), either non-muscle or muscle invasive bladder cancer (for cystectomy arm this excludes any finding at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 12 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, up to 12 months post enrollment
Population: All participants who had an electronic health record review or death record at least 12 months after the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Survival times were calculated from the date of recurrence to the event (metastasis or death). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Recurrence-free Survival | 226 Participants |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Recurrence-free Survival | 176 Participants |
Patient Recurrence-free Survival
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on recurrence-free survival. Survival times were calculated from the date of diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to the event (recurrence or death). A recurrence was defined as any subsequent episode of high-grade bladder cancer in the bladder or elsewhere in the urinary tract (penile urethra, prostatic urethra, ureters, renal pelvis), either non-muscle or muscle invasive bladder cancer (for cystectomy arm this excludes any finding at cystectomy). Censoring occurred at the last electronic health record review or death.
Time frame: 24 months after diagnosis of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Patient-reported Anxiety as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a
The evaluation of patient-reported anxiety, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Anxiety as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a
The evaluation of patient-reported anxiety, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Anxiety as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a
The evaluation of patient-reported anxiety, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We imputed missing outcomes and covariates for TMLE analyses of this outcome. Therefore, all participants who enrolled in CISTO are included whether or not they completed that outcome. The mean and standard deviation for this outcome was calculated using only participants who completed this outcome (n = 294 and 169 for bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy arms, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient-reported Anxiety as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a | 50.0 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient-reported Anxiety as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a | 48.8 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
Patient-reported Depression as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a
The evaluation of patient-reported depression, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We imputed missing outcomes and covariates for TMLE analyses of this outcome. Therefore, all participants who enrolled in CISTO are included whether or not they completed that outcome. The mean and standard deviation for this outcome was calculated using only participants who completed this outcome (n = 294 and 169 for bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy arms, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient-reported Depression as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a | 48.0 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient-reported Depression as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a | 48.0 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
Patient-reported Depression as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a
The evaluation of patient-reported depression, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Depression as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a
The evaluation of patient-reported depression, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptoms. Scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Generic Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L
The evaluation of patient-reported generic quality of life as measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L (EQ-5D). Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Generic Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L
The evaluation of patient-reported generic quality of life as measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L (EQ-5D). Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient-reported Generic Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L
The evaluation of patient-reported generic quality of life as measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L (EQ-5D). Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We imputed missing outcomes and covariates for TMLE analyses of this outcome. Therefore, all participants who enrolled in CISTO are included whether or not they completed that outcome. The mean and standard deviation for this outcome was calculated using only participants who completed this outcome (n = 278 and 162 for bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy arms, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient-reported Generic Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L | 0.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient-reported Generic Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L | 0.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
Patient Self-reported Bowel Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Bowel Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported bowel health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Bowel Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Bowel Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported bowel health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We imputed missing outcomes and covariates for TMLE analyses of this outcome. Therefore, all participants who enrolled in CISTO are included whether or not they completed that outcome. The mean and standard deviation for this outcome was calculated using only participants who completed this outcome (n = 293 and 166 for bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy arms, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Self-reported Bowel Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Bowel Summary Score | 80.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Self-reported Bowel Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Bowel Summary Score | 77.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
Patient Self-reported Bowel Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Bowel Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported bowel health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Financial Distress as Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST)
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported financial distress, as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). The COST questionnaire consists of 11 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from zero to four. After reversing some items as indicated in the scoring manual (by reversing the sign on the original zero to four score and adding four), all item response scores are summed into a single financial toxicity score ranging from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating greater financial wellbeing. Each subscale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in that subscale in order to be calculated. Item nonresponse is accounted for by substituting the mean of the completed items in the subscale.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We imputed missing outcomes and covariates for TMLE analyses of this outcome. Therefore, all participants who enrolled in CISTO are included whether or not they completed that outcome. The mean and standard deviation for this outcome was calculated using only participants who completed this outcome (n = 288 and 167 for bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy arms, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Self-reported Financial Distress as Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) | 30.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Self-reported Financial Distress as Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) | 31.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
Patient Self-reported Financial Distress as Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST)
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported financial distress, as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). The COST questionnaire consists of 11 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from zero to four. After reversing some items as indicated in the scoring manual (by reversing the sign on the original zero to four score and adding four), all item response scores are summed into a single financial toxicity score ranging from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating greater financial wellbeing. Each subscale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in that subscale in order to be calculated. Item nonresponse is accounted for by substituting the mean of the completed items in the subscale.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Financial Distress as Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST)
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported financial distress, as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). The COST questionnaire consists of 11 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from zero to four. After reversing some items as indicated in the scoring manual (by reversing the sign on the original zero to four score and adding four), all item response scores are summed into a single financial toxicity score ranging from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating greater financial wellbeing. Each subscale requires responses for at least 50% of the items in that subscale in order to be calculated. Item nonresponse is accounted for by substituting the mean of the completed items in the subscale.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Sexual Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Sexual Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported sexual health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Sexual Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Sexual Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported sexual health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We imputed missing outcomes and covariates for TMLE analyses of this outcome. Therefore, all participants who enrolled in CISTO are included whether or not they completed that outcome. The mean and standard deviation for this outcome was calculated using only participants who completed this outcome (n = 238 and 143 for bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy arms, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Self-reported Sexual Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Sexual Summary Score | 47.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.7 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Self-reported Sexual Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Sexual Summary Score | 32.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
Patient Self-reported Sexual Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Sexual Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported sexual health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Urinary Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Urinary Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported urinary health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate the two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 60 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Urinary Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Urinary Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported urinary health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate the two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 24 months after enrollment
Patient Self-reported Urinary Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Urinary Summary Score
The evaluation of the effect of treatment choice on patient-reported urinary health, as measured by the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales, covering 3 primary domains: urinary, bowel, and sexual. For each domain a summary score is constructed from the items used to calculate the two subscale scores (function and bother). Scores are calculated by transforming item responses into a 0 to 100 scale and calculating the mean of the standardized items. Higher scores indicate better health status. To calculate a score, a minimum of 80% completed items is required.
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Population: We imputed missing outcomes and covariates for TMLE analyses of this outcome. Therefore, all participants who enrolled in CISTO are included whether or not they completed that outcome. The mean and standard deviation for this outcome was calculated using only participants who completed this outcome (n = 292 and 166 for bladder-sparing therapy and radical cystectomy arms, respectively).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy | Patient Self-reported Urinary Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Urinary Summary Score | 85.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Patients who have selected radical cystectomy | Patient Self-reported Urinary Health as Measured by the Bladder Cancer Index Urinary Summary Score | 83.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.2 |