Skip to content

Building a Bridge (BAB) Between Clinical and Community Care

Building a Bridge (Between Clinical and Community Care): Post-diagnosis Support for Persons With Dementia and Their Families

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03932812
Acronym
BAB
Enrollment
82
Registered
2019-05-01
Start date
2019-08-01
Completion date
2021-10-31
Last updated
2025-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregiver Burden

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, Dementia, Caregiver, Bridging community, Bridging medical settings

Brief summary

Dementia diagnosis triggers a transitional phase for the individuals and their families, often causing emotional distress and family conflicts due to the ambiguity of the illness and future trajectories. Families often report a lack of information and guidance during the period immediately following diagnosis, suggesting a missed opportunity for prevention of family distress at the outset of the caregiver and patient career. With large and increasing numbers of individuals newly diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) each year, there is an urgent need to develop effective intervention models to support role transitions and minimize distress related to ADRD diagnosis. The long-term goal of this research is to minimize negative consequences of ADRD by enhancing the support systems of the affected families as they start their new and challenging phase of life as patients and family caregivers. The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of this new Options Counselor-Health Education (OC-HE) intervention on bridging the medical and community-settings through potential mechanisms of influence, enhancement of social networks and support. Implementation strategies will be developed in collaboration with partnering clinics and local Area Agencies on Aging. Participants will be recruited from three clinics at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) that provide dementia diagnostic services and randomized into an intervention or control arm; and complete baseline and three- and six-month follow-up interviews. This study is innovative in its consideration of contributing factors at multiple levels of the ecological model (i.e., individual, social network, and organizational) and its collaborative approach, involving medical clinics, an Area Agency on Aging (AAA), and Alzheimer's Association (AA) to develop and evaluate a new care model that bridges between the medical and community settings.

Detailed description

Once the participant has consented, the research assistant will set up a time to complete a baseline interview, either in-person or via telephone. The baseline interview will take 40-50 minutes to complete. After the baseline survey has been completed, the participant will be randomized using simple randomization based on a computer-generated random numbers to assign the family into the intervention or standard care (control group). If the participant is randomized into the intervention group, the options counselor will be given the participant's contact information and will establish contact with the participant to make an in-home or telephone (if preferred) visit within two weeks of the participant's consent. The participant and patient can jointly participate in the initial meeting. The options counselor may make additional calls to the participant if more information is needed in the absence of the patient as requested by the participant. During the initial visit/call, the options counselor will use the modified Options Counseling (OC) assessment tool and caregiver intake form (attached) to assess patient and family needs and to develop family actions plans (see attached family action plan form) using LifeLong Links to identify services available in their local areas, and to connect them to providers. The options counselor will also provide dementia education on the topics that the family desires to discuss. Modules to discuss with the participant include About Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia, Social Relationships and Daily Life, Anticipating Changes and Challenges, Interacting with Providers, and Addressing Future Needs. This initial visit should take between 1 and 2 hours. The options counselor will conduct 5 additional follow-up intervention calls, which will last between 30 minutes to 1 hour. These calls will happen each month, in the 5 months following the initial visit/call. The follow up intervention calls will be used to adjust action plans and implement additional training modules selected by the participant. The attached intervention log will be filled out by the options counselor after each session (6 sessions per participant) to track what was covered. The research team will use the intervention logs as fidelity checks. The sessions will also be recorded so that the research team can check for fidelity to intervention protocol. The options counselor, Maria Donohoe, is a research team member on this IRB. Both intervention and standard care participants will complete 3 month and 6 month interviews, conducted by the research team members. The standard care group will have 3 and 6 month interviews prior to their receiving a call from an options counselor. The call and work that the standard care group does with an options counselor is not the intervention because the intervention protocol for this research will not be used. This phone call is made for the standard care group to receive support after the study data is collected if desired. Each follow up interview will take between 30 and 40 minutes to complete. All three interviews will be recorded so that research team members can review the data for accuracy. Participants will be asked by the research assistant for permission to record and will be invited to let the researcher know if they would not like to be recorded or if they would like to turn off the recorder at any time. Participants will still be able to participate in the study if they do not elect to be recorded. The responses questions will be recorded on paper and then entered into an online survey database on Qualtrics. Those in the intervention group wishing to continue and those in the standard care group wishing to receive Options Counseling after completing the 6 month interview will receive a call from a local options counselor in their area. Options Counseling services are provided using the Older American's Act funding by the local Area Agencies on Aging, thus, there will be no cost for older individuals and their family. . For each interview, the research assistant will make up to three calls to schedule a time, leaving a voicemail (if available) and a phone number to call if the participant would like to continue their participation. On the final call, the research assistant will let the participant know that this is the last call and if the participant would like to continue with the study, they are welcome to call back. Those who miss the 3-month follow-up interview will be contacted again for the 6-month follow up interview, and the same protocol will be used to establish contact. At the end of the study (after the 6 month follow up interview), all study participants, regardless of study arm, will be given the option to receive a call from an options counselor who will offer options counseling services in their own community.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOptions Counselor Health Educator (OC-HE) Intervention

The OC-HE will meet in person with the participant one time and five times via telephone to provide options counseling based on modules developed by the research team

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Kansas
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Michigan
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston College
CollaboratorOTHER
Drexel University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sato Ashida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 110 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age * Speaks English * Lives in Iowa * Caregiver of someone diagnosed with dementia within the past 6 months

Exclusion criteria

\- Does not meet inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Zarit Burden InterviewChange over time from baseline to 6-monthCaregiver burden 12 item self report questionnaire; Minimum score 0, maximum score 36 with low scores showing less burden

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge of Formal ServicesChange over time from baseline to 6-monthEstablished measure of the extent to which caregiver knows about formal services available in their communities. Participants answer the extent to which (on a five-point Likert scale from not at all true of me to completely true of me) they are informed about federal programs, that they know what to do to get help, that they know how to get the person they care for into a nursing home, that they are aware of how to pay for a nursing home, that they can get information about different options for getting care, that they know which home health care agencies are active in their area, that they know which nursing facilities are available in their area, and how to get assistance due to COVID (added later). The scale ranges from Not True at all of me to Completely true of me, where these answers and those in between score 1-5. The scale is scored by adding up these scores of the 8 questions. Thus, the range is 8-40, with a 40 being the highest knowledge of formal services.
Center for Epidemiologic Studies DepressionChange over time from baseline to 6-monthTen item measure assessing the extent to which the individual is experiencing depressive symptoms. Questions ask about how often feelings or events happen in a week on a scale from None of the time, where less than one day receives 0 points, to Most of the time, where 5 to 7 days receives 3 points. The lowest score is a 0, indicating no depression. The highest score is 30, indicating high depression.
Social Network-UpliftChange over time from baseline to 6-monthCount of network members engaging in supportive interactions (Uplift) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 8 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in uplifting interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.
Social Network-MalfeasantChange over time from baseline to 6-monthCount of network members engaging in negative caregiving social interactions (Malfeasant) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 7 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in malfeasant interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.
Emergency Care UseChange over time from baseline to 6-monthSelf-reported measure of the number of times participants have visited a doctor or other health care provider unexpectedly in the past 6 months. The lowest score could be 0, indicating no emergency care use and the highest score for each could be 180 days, indicating that the participant visited a doctor or health care provider every day for the past six months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caregiving Self-EfficacyChange over time from baseline to 6-month5-item self-reported measure assessing caregivers' confidence to use community-based services. The scale ranges on level of certainty from not at all certain to very certain. The responses are scored on a scale of 0-10. These scores are summed up for a final score of 0-50, with a 50 being the highest knowledge of formal services. Questions include how certain the caregiver can get answers to all questions about services in the community, find organizations or agencies that provide services in need, arrange for services themselves, get answers to all questions about the individual's care, and get answers to changes in services due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention Group
These individuals will receive the Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention Options Counselor Health Educator (OC-HE) Intervention: The OC-HE will meet in person with the participant one time and five times via telephone to provide options counseling based on modules developed by the research team
42
Control
These individuals will receive the typical standard of care treatment from clinics
40
Total82

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath of care partner (person living with dementia)51
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1214

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalOptions Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupControl
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
59 Participants31 Participants28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants11 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
78 Participants41 Participants37 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
FAST Score3.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
3.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
78 Participants41 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants26 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants16 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 420 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 420 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 420 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Modified Zarit Burden Interview

Caregiver burden 12 item self report questionnaire; Minimum score 0, maximum score 36 with low scores showing less burden

Time frame: Change over time from baseline to 6-month

Population: All participants who completed baseline. Note that the discrepancies in the number analyzed at different time points are due to patients dropping out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupModified Zarit Burden InterviewBaseline19.429 Burden scoreStandard Deviation 9.399
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupModified Zarit Burden Interview3-month32.207 Burden scoreStandard Deviation 7.466
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupModified Zarit Burden Interview6-month31.375 Burden scoreStandard Deviation 6.864
ControlModified Zarit Burden InterviewBaseline17.950 Burden scoreStandard Deviation 8.348
ControlModified Zarit Burden Interview3-month27.160 Burden scoreStandard Deviation 6.811
ControlModified Zarit Burden Interview6-month28.615 Burden scoreStandard Deviation 8.208
p-value: 0.206Regression, Linear
Secondary

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression

Ten item measure assessing the extent to which the individual is experiencing depressive symptoms. Questions ask about how often feelings or events happen in a week on a scale from None of the time, where less than one day receives 0 points, to Most of the time, where 5 to 7 days receives 3 points. The lowest score is a 0, indicating no depression. The highest score is 30, indicating high depression.

Time frame: Change over time from baseline to 6-month

Population: Note that the discrepancies in the number analyzed at different time points are due to patients dropping out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupCenter for Epidemiologic Studies DepressionBaseline4.051 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.751
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression3-month19.517 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.74
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression6-month7.240 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.741
ControlCenter for Epidemiologic Studies DepressionBaseline2.806 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.71
ControlCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression3-month19.640 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.804
ControlCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression6-month5.815 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.261
p-value: 0.836Regression, Linear
Secondary

Emergency Care Use

Self-reported measure of the number of times participants have visited a doctor or other health care provider unexpectedly in the past 6 months. The lowest score could be 0, indicating no emergency care use and the highest score for each could be 180 days, indicating that the participant visited a doctor or health care provider every day for the past six months

Time frame: Change over time from baseline to 6-month

Population: Note that the discrepancies in the number analyzed at different time points are due to patients dropping out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupEmergency Care UseBaseline0.714 VisitsStandard Deviation 1.255
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupEmergency Care Use3-months0.207 VisitsStandard Deviation 0.491
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupEmergency Care Use6-months0.292 VisitsStandard Deviation 0.908
ControlEmergency Care UseBaseline0.750 VisitsStandard Deviation 1.296
ControlEmergency Care Use3-months0.320 VisitsStandard Deviation 0.476
ControlEmergency Care Use6-months0.346 VisitsStandard Deviation 0.562
Comparison: The outcome for this analyses is use of emergency care.p-value: 0.567Chi-squared
Secondary

Knowledge of Formal Services

Established measure of the extent to which caregiver knows about formal services available in their communities. Participants answer the extent to which (on a five-point Likert scale from not at all true of me to completely true of me) they are informed about federal programs, that they know what to do to get help, that they know how to get the person they care for into a nursing home, that they are aware of how to pay for a nursing home, that they can get information about different options for getting care, that they know which home health care agencies are active in their area, that they know which nursing facilities are available in their area, and how to get assistance due to COVID (added later). The scale ranges from Not True at all of me to Completely true of me, where these answers and those in between score 1-5. The scale is scored by adding up these scores of the 8 questions. Thus, the range is 8-40, with a 40 being the highest knowledge of formal services.

Time frame: Change over time from baseline to 6-month

Population: Note that the discrepancies in the number analyzed at different time points are due to patients dropping out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupKnowledge of Formal ServicesBaseline25.381 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.704
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupKnowledge of Formal Services3-month29.690 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.607
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupKnowledge of Formal Services6-month29.520 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.315
ControlKnowledge of Formal ServicesBaseline25.350 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.678
ControlKnowledge of Formal Services3-month28.154 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.953
ControlKnowledge of Formal Services6-month28.222 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.567
p-value: 0.101Regression, Linear
Secondary

Social Network-Malfeasant

Count of network members engaging in negative caregiving social interactions (Malfeasant) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 7 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in malfeasant interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.

Time frame: Change over time from baseline to 6-month

Population: Note that the discrepancies in the number analyzed at different time points are due to patients dropping out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupSocial Network-MalfeasantBaseline2.098 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 2.035
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupSocial Network-Malfeasant3-month4.966 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 4.395
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupSocial Network-Malfeasant6-month1.520 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 1.418
ControlSocial Network-MalfeasantBaseline1.800 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 1.436
ControlSocial Network-Malfeasant3-month8.360 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 5.992
ControlSocial Network-Malfeasant6-month0.852 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 1.027
p-value: 0.01Chi-squared
Secondary

Social Network-Uplift

Count of network members engaging in supportive interactions (Uplift) for each caregiver. Each caregiver had network members providing different levels of support. There are 8 survey questions to indicate whether network members engaged in uplifting interactions in any way. A network member with at least one interaction is counted. At each time point, the questions are asked again and reevaluated.

Time frame: Change over time from baseline to 6-month

Population: Note that the discrepancies in the number analyzed at different time points are due to patients dropping out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupSocial Network-UpliftBaseline11.439 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 6.786
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupSocial Network-Uplift3-month8.448 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 5.494
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupSocial Network-Uplift6-month7.880 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 5.102
ControlSocial Network-UpliftBaseline10.750 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 5.088
ControlSocial Network-Uplift3-month12.400 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 5.331
ControlSocial Network-Uplift6-month9.889 Count of support network members for a cStandard Deviation 5.423
p-value: 0.014Chi-squared
Other Pre-specified

Caregiving Self-Efficacy

5-item self-reported measure assessing caregivers' confidence to use community-based services. The scale ranges on level of certainty from not at all certain to very certain. The responses are scored on a scale of 0-10. These scores are summed up for a final score of 0-50, with a 50 being the highest knowledge of formal services. Questions include how certain the caregiver can get answers to all questions about services in the community, find organizations or agencies that provide services in need, arrange for services themselves, get answers to all questions about the individual's care, and get answers to changes in services due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Time frame: Change over time from baseline to 6-month

Population: Note that the discrepancies in the number analyzed at different time points are due to patients dropping out of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupCaregiving Self-EfficacyBaseline29.524 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.814
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupCaregiving Self-Efficacy3-month35.345 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.995
Options Counselor Health Educator Intervention GroupCaregiving Self-Efficacy6-month33.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.157
ControlCaregiving Self-EfficacyBaseline31.775 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.666
ControlCaregiving Self-Efficacy3-month34.600 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.528
ControlCaregiving Self-Efficacy6-month33.481 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.992
p-value: 0.188Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026