Skip to content

Rapid Molecular Organism Identification and Mixed Flora Antibiotic Resistance Profiling (MixAR) Prospective Study

Urinary Tract Infection: RapID Molecular Organism Identification and Mixed Flora Antibiotic Resistance Profiling (MixAR)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03931538
Acronym
RapIDMixAR
Enrollment
2511
Registered
2019-04-30
Start date
2018-07-17
Completion date
2019-10-01
Last updated
2023-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections, Prostatitis, Interstitial Cystitis

Keywords

UTI, IC

Brief summary

In this protocol, investigators are examining the ability for a novel multiplex PCR assay with mixed floral antibiotic resistance profiling is safe and increases effective treatment for urinary tract infections in a urology clinic over traditional culture methods alone and decreases retreatment rates in this population.

Detailed description

The novel multiplex real-time PCR assay with mixed floral antibiotic resistance profiling offers a higher degree of sensitivity and specificity than conventional culture methods in the identification of UTI pathogens as determined by the previous prospective comparison study. Additionally, conventional methods are often inadequate in the case of polymicrobial infections. More accurate and timely pathogen identification allows for prompt and more targeted treatment with less reliance on empiric therapy and decreased rates of antibiotic therapy changes and retreatment. This leads to more favorable patient outcomes and decreases the development of resistant organisms.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTGuidance 4.0 PCR test

All patients will have a urine culture and Guidance 4.0 PCR test run on their urine, but physicians will receive one or the other, or both depending on the treatment arm.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTUrine Culture

All patients will have a urine culture and Guidance 4.0 PCR test run on their urine, but physicians will receive one or the other, or both depending on the treatment arm.

Sponsors

Comprehensive Urology-a Division of Michigan Healthcare Professionals
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Pathnostics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Patient Informed Consent form completed * Male and Female Subjects may participate with no predetermined quotas or ratios for gender participation. * All patients must be ≥60 years old. For patients presenting with a diagnosis of interstitial cystitis, patients may be of any age. * Patients must be presenting for treatment of acute UTI, complicated UTI, persistent UTI, or recurrent UTI's. * Including prostatitis, pyelonephritis, and/or interstitial cystitis. * Data pertaining to the times at which the specimen samples are collected and stabilized needs to be documented. * Specimen samples obtained need to have a sufficient volume necessary to perform a urine culture and Guidance 4.0.

Exclusion criteria

* • Do not provide written informed Consent with HIPAA authorization form. * Taking antibiotics for any reason other than UTI at the time of enrollment * Patients with chronic (\> 10 days) indwelling catheters * Self-catheterized patients * Patients with neobladders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Establish Safety: composite adverse event rate7 DaysDemonstrate safety of Guidance 4.0 multiplex real-time PCR organism identification with mixed floral antibiotic resistance profiling guided treatment. Safety will be measured with a composite adverse event outcome of urosepsis, pyelonephritis, hospitalization, or the need to attend an urgent care center. The composite adverse event rate in the arm tested with Guidance 4.0 will be shown to be non-inferior to that in the arm tested with traditional urine culture. Superiority will also be tested.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients with Recurrent and Persistent Infections in Each Arm7 DaysDemonstrate non-inferiority and possibly superiority of Guidance 4.0 over traditional urine C&S with respect to the percentage of recurrent and persistent infections. Persistent is remaining infection at day 7 and recurrent infection is a person that had a second infection within 30 days that was treated with antibiotics.
Time to Symptom Resolution in Each Arm7 daysDemonstrate superiority of Guidance 4.0 over traditional urine C&S with respect to the time to symptom resolution as demonstrated by UTISA tool. Symptom resolution will be defined as an overall rating of no symptoms on the UTISA questionnaire.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physician Choice for Decision Making when Provided Both Results4 Months• To determine which test physicians, rely upon when given the results of both traditional urine C&S vs. Guidance 4.0.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026