Skip to content

PK Sampling After IV Oxytocin and Effects on Sensory Function in Healthy Volunteers

Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Oxytocin and Effects on Sensory Function in Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03929367
Enrollment
11
Registered
2019-04-26
Start date
2019-05-10
Completion date
2020-03-01
Last updated
2021-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

The primary goal of this protocol is to model change in oxytocin concentrations in plasma after intravenous (IV) administration. Additional measurements will be performed on sensory function that could be influenced by oxytocin during later time periods when blood samples are widely separated by time. This protocol will describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous oxytocin in healthy adult men and adult,non-pregnant women. PK samples will be obtained after an injection of intravenous oxytocin 10 IU over 60 seconds. Blood will be drawn for the PK samples prior to the oxytocin administration and then 11 times after administration. There are two additional measures which will assess two different aspects of sensory function. MEASURE 1: Light Touch Frequency Threshold In order to determine the highest frequency that specific nerve fibers can respond to, a simple device that produces an oscillatory / vibratory stimulus will be used on the hand. The subject places fingertips, palm, and palm side of the wrist sequentially and the device is set to slowly decrease the frequency of vibration from 1 kHz until the subject first perceives this. This is repeated three times at each site and takes less than 5 minutes in total. This will be performed before the oxytocin administration and 6 times after the administration of IV Oxytocin. MEASURE 2: Sustained Heat The surface of the skin of the forearm or leg is heated to 113°F using a computer controlled thermode for a period of 5 minutes. This will be done before the IV Oxytocin and 4 times after the administration. A set of random thermal temperatures (98°F-122°F) will also be applied to the skin of the leg or forearm before the IV Oxytocin administration and 4 times after administration of IV Oxytocin.

Detailed description

The primary goal of this protocol is to model change in oxytocin concentrations in plasma after intravenous administration, (oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IU) the investigators will also acquire tests of sensory function that could be modulated by oxytocin during later time periods when blood samples are widely separated by time. There are two measures which will assess two different aspects of sensory function. MEASURE 1: Light Touch Frequency Threshold Light touch is subserved by a group of myelinated peripheral nerves with fast conduction in the Aβ range and which are capable of following high frequencies, being responsible for the sensation of vibration. This capability of individual nerve fibers to respond with high frequency also underlies our ability to sense a light touch moving across the body surface as in brushing. In preclinical studies investigators have shown that, following injury, these light touch fibers lose their ability to follow high frequencies and, in some cases, no longer respond to mechanical stimulation at all. Oxytocin, when perfused around the neuronal cell bodies of these Aβ nerve fibers, partially restores their function, including their response to high frequency stimulation. In order to determine the highest frequency that Aβ nerve fibers can respond to, the investigators have created a simple device that produces an oscillatory / vibratory stimulus which can be used on the hand. The subject places fingertips, palm, and volar aspect of the wrist sequentially and the device is set to slowly decrease the frequency of vibration from 1 kilohertz (kHz) until the participant first perceives this. This is repeated three times at each site and takes under 5 minutes in total. The investigators anticipate that oxytocin will have no effect on normal Aβ fibers and that this measure will not change after oxytocin administration. This will provide important data to contrast with the expected efficacy of oxytocin in the setting of injury, to be studied in subsequent protocols. MEASURE 2: Sustained Heat As part of a protocol used by the investigators in several studies, the surface of the skin of the forearm or leg is heated to 45°C using a computer-controlled thermode for a period of 5 minutes. This typically results in a slowly increasing pain experience, peaking at 5 minutes in the mild to low moderate range and has been tolerated by more than 150 subjects in studies over the past 14 years. In an interim analysis of an ongoing clinical study in volunteers, the investigators noted that spinal injection of oxytocin, 15 μg (equivalent to 9 IU), that pain from this sustained heat was dramatically reduced over the 5 minutes of stimulus presentation. In contrast, spinal oxytocin had no effect on the stimulus-response relationship of pain to noxious heat over a 42-50°C range when the stimuli were presented for only 5 seconds. These data suggest that oxytocin reduces C-fiber mediated signaling of sustained heat pain, likely through a spinal site of action. Drugs administered spinally have a much higher concentration in cerebrospinal fluid than plasma. Nonetheless, spinally administered drugs are typically absorbed to an extent and with a time course similar to that after intramuscular injection, and it is conceivable that the effect on sustained heat pain investigators are seeing in the spinal study reflect peripheral effects via systemic absorption. Thus, if the investigators see a similar reduction in response to sustained heat in this protocol of intravenous administration, the investigators will conclude that oxytocin is more likely activating peripherally than spinally.

Interventions

DRUGOxytocin

Single IV administration of oxytocin

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single intravenous administration of oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IU

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female \> 18 and \< 60 years of age, Body Mass Index (BMI) \<40. * Generally in good health as determined by the Principal Investigator based on prior medical history, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II * Normal blood pressure (systolic 90-140 mmHg; diastolic 50-90 mmHg) resting heart rate 45-100 beats per minute) without medication * Female subjects of child-bearing potential and those \< 1 year post-menopausal, must be practicing highly effective methods of birth control such as hormonal methods

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity, allergy, or significant reaction to any ingredient of Pitocin® * Any disease, diagnosis, or condition (medical or surgical) that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, would place the subject at increased risk (active gynecologic disease in which increased tone would be detrimental e.g., uterine fibroids with ongoing bleeding), compromise the subject's compliance with study procedures, or compromise the quality of the data * Women who are pregnant (positive result for serum pregnancy test at screening visit), women who are currently nursing or lactating, women that have been pregnant within 2 years * Subjects with neuropathy, chronic pain, diabetes mellitus, or taking benzodiazepines or pain medications on a daily basis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxytocin Concentration2 minutesPlasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Light Touch Frequency Threshold5 minutesThe frequency at which the vibration is perceived after intravenous oxytocin administration
Sustained Heat31 minutes0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

None. All enrolled subjects completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IU
Oxytocin 10 IU administered once per intravenous injection Oxytocin: Single IV administration of oxytocin
11
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IU
Age, Continuous38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
BMI29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Height173 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Light Touch Frequency Threshold731 Hz
STANDARD_DEVIATION 155
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
Sustained heat
Five minutes
1.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
Sustained heat
Four minutes
.82 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25
Sustained heat
One minute
.36 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.21
Sustained heat
Three minutes
.64 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29
Sustained heat
Two minutes
.68 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
Weight86 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 2 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration1047 pg/mlStandard Deviation 556
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 10 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration322 pg/mlStandard Deviation 136
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 15 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration202 pg/mlStandard Deviation 91
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration82 pg/mlStandard Deviation 40
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 45 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration41 pg/mlStandard Deviation 20
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration25 pg/mlStandard Deviation 13
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 90 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration10 pg/mlStandard Deviation 5.6
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 120 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration6.2 pg/mlStandard Deviation 3.6
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 180 minutes

Population: In 7 subjects oxytocin concentration was below the limit of detection (1 pg/ml)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration2.5 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1.6
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 240 minutes

Population: In 9 subjects oxytocin concentration was below the limit of detection (1 pg/ml)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration1.0 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1.5
Primary

Oxytocin Concentration

Plasma concentrations of oxytocin at defined times after intravenous infusion

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUOxytocin Concentration587 pg/mlStandard Deviation 257
Secondary

Light Touch Frequency Threshold

The frequency at which the vibration is perceived after intravenous oxytocin administration

Time frame: 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IULight Touch Frequency Threshold722 HzStandard Deviation 141
p-value: 0.89ANOVA
Secondary

Light Touch Frequency Threshold

The frequency at which the vibration is perceived after intravenous oxytocin administration

Time frame: 20 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IULight Touch Frequency Threshold710 HzStandard Deviation 130
Secondary

Light Touch Frequency Threshold

The frequency at which the vibration is perceived after intravenous oxytocin administration

Time frame: 180 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IULight Touch Frequency Threshold771 HzStandard Deviation 99
Secondary

Light Touch Frequency Threshold

The frequency at which the vibration is perceived after intravenous oxytocin administration

Time frame: 45 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IULight Touch Frequency Threshold732 HzStandard Deviation 128
Secondary

Light Touch Frequency Threshold

The frequency at which the vibration is perceived after intravenous oxytocin administration

Time frame: 60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IULight Touch Frequency Threshold727 HzStandard Deviation 127
Secondary

Light Touch Frequency Threshold

The frequency at which the vibration is perceived after intravenous oxytocin administration

Time frame: 120 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IULight Touch Frequency Threshold693 HzStandard Deviation 154
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 183 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 184 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 63 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 185 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 64 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 31 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat0.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 32 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
p-value: 0.014ANOVA
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 33 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 34 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 35 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 61 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 62 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 65 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 121 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 122 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 123 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 124 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 125 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 181 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Sustained Heat

0-10 verbal pain score to a 45 degree Celsius stimulus after intravenous oxytocin administration; higher score denotes worse outcome.

Time frame: 182 minutes

Population: Technical failure in one subject, leaving 10 evaluable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxytocin (Pitocin®), 10 IUSustained Heat.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026