Skip to content

Parent-Adolescent Training on Neurofeedback and Synchrony

The Dyadic Inter-Brain Signaling (DIBS) Project With Parent-Adolescent Training on Neurofeedback and Synchrony

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03929263
Enrollment
24
Registered
2019-04-26
Start date
2019-09-25
Completion date
2021-02-27
Last updated
2024-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Testing Protocol With Healthy Individuals for Feasibility

Brief summary

The study will test a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) hyperscanning neurofeedback protocol for feasibility with ten mothers and their psychiatrically healthy adolescent daughters, with the eventual goal to test this in a sample of depressed adolescents in a future study.

Detailed description

This study will utilize a rigorous multi-method, multi-informant design to examine the effects of dyadic neurofeedback (dnf) on adolescent brain activation with fMRI hyperscanning. Parents and adolescents will also report on emotion regulation, depressive symptoms, and parenting practices. Data collection procedures will take place at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), which is equipped with two identical scanners that have advanced real-time fMRI systems capable of conducting parallel fMRI hyperscanning, including the capacity for neurofeedback. Parents will complete a phone screen to determine initial eligibility. If initial study criteria are met, a 2-hour in-person lab visit will be scheduled where mothers and daughters will complete consent/assent; diagnostic interviews; surveys on emotion regulation, parenting practices, depression, and anxiety; and additional screening. Survey data will be used for preliminary exploratory analyses. Based on data collected from the screening visit, participants will be invited to participate in the full study: a 4-hour visit where mothers and daughters will complete emotion ratings, mock scanner training, and fMRI tasks individually and together using hyperscanning (scan time = 16 min resting-state \[2 runs\], 7 min structural MRI, 40 min fMRI tasks, 10 min clinical MRI scans).

Interventions

Participants will attempt to regulate own and/or their partner's brain activation in a specified brain region via real-time fMRI neurofeedback.

Sponsors

Oklahoma State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
13 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible for fMRI * Sufficient English fluency to complete tasks * BMI ≦ 40.0 * Right-handed * Biological female * Co-residing at least 4 days/week * Adult participants: Biological mother of adolescent participant * Adult participants:Primary caregiver \> 50% of child's lifespan * Adult participants:BMI ≧ 18.0 * Adolescent participants: Age 13-17 years * Adolescent participants: BMI ≧ 16.0

Exclusion criteria

* Current psychiatric diagnosis * Medications influencing fMRI * Medical conditions influencing fMRI * Alcohol or psychoactive drug on scan day * Adolescent participants: Neurodevelopmental delay * Adolescent participants: History of mood or psychotic disorder * Adolescent participants: History of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurofeedback Rating ScaleBaseline (Acquired during scan session)Rating scale of perceived effectiveness in completing the task and changing brain activation. Likert scale ranging from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating greater perceived effectiveness.
Emotion Rating ScaleBaseline (Acquired during scan session)Rating scale asking about current experience of various emotions (happy, sad, angry, etc.). Scale ranges from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating more intense emotions.
Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Signal Changes (Brain Activation)Baseline (Acquired during scan session)Activation in the brain region targeted for neurofeedback and associated regions; resting-state network activity

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback
All participants will receive neurofeedback from the target region (no sham condition). Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Participants will attempt to regulate own and/or their partner's brain activation in a specified brain region via real-time fMRI neurofeedback.
24
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReal-time fMRI Neurofeedback
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
12 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Signal Changes (Brain Activation)

Activation in the brain region targeted for neurofeedback and associated regions; resting-state network activity

Time frame: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)

Population: Only adolescents' data that passed quality control were analyzed. Values are taken from the anterior insula and averaged across scanning runs and participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real-time fMRI NeurofeedbackBlood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Signal Changes (Brain Activation)0.15 percent signal changeStandard Deviation 0.38
Primary

Emotion Rating Scale

Rating scale asking about current experience of various emotions (happy, sad, angry, etc.). Scale ranges from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating more intense emotions.

Time frame: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)

Population: Only data from participants used in the neuroimaging results were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real-time fMRI NeurofeedbackEmotion Rating Scale2.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Primary

Neurofeedback Rating Scale

Rating scale of perceived effectiveness in completing the task and changing brain activation. Likert scale ranging from 0-10, with higher numbers indicating greater perceived effectiveness.

Time frame: Baseline (Acquired during scan session)

Population: Parents who participated in at least one neurofeedback session with available data for this outcome variable

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real-time fMRI NeurofeedbackNeurofeedback Rating Scale5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026