Skip to content

Investigation of Genetic Predictors of the Response to Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRI) Treatment

Investigation of Genetic Predictors of the Response to SSRI Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03927950
Enrollment
135
Registered
2019-04-25
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2019-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depression

Keywords

Treatment efficacy, Safety

Brief summary

The antidepressant medications are among the most commonly prescribed pharmacological agents in patients with mood and anxiety disorder. Despite recent advances in antidepressant pharmacotherapy, there is a pressing need for substantial optimization and improvment of outcome of pharmacotherapy of psychiatric disorders by providing individualized and science-based treatment guidelines. Besides it is rather difficult in clinical practice to predict, which patient will response to a certain pharmacological treatment well and which one less so. Putative predictors of response to antidepressant include demographic and clinical characteristics, personality traits, biological markers and psychophysiological features. Recently the research studies shown that divergences in antidepressant efficacy may be related to genetic variations of patients. The pharmacogenetic studies have multiplied in recent decade due to the impact that such studies may have in everyday clinical practice once reliable predictors could be identified. The pharmacogenetic research using new DNA microarray-based technology can reasonably be expected to contribute to the prediction of likelihood of treatment response and risk of development of adverse side effects in individual patients in case of antidepressant treatment. By reducing costly treatment failures and the likelihood of serious adverse events, pharmacogenetic testing may help to improve the treatment possibilities for chronic diseases, reduce the burden prescription drug costs, and lower the costs of drug development. The further detailed investigation of peripheral gene expression profiles may help to identify responsible genes that underlie the process of development of affective disorders and open novel horizons for understanding molecular mechanisms of psychopharmacological treatment.

Detailed description

To participate in the study the subjects must be at least 18 years old and give a written informed consent after an oral and written explanation of the study aims and methods. The study sample will include the female and male patients with panic disorder or major depression diagnosis according to DSM-IV criteria. Patients will be recruited from the out- and inpatients services of the Psychiatric Clinic of the Tartu University Hospital. For the detailed assessment of clinical severity of specific disorder and treatment effects the disorder-specific rating scales: Montgomery-Asberg's Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) will be used. The adverse effects will be evaluated by letting the patients to fill the checklist of side-symptoms. In both patient groups (with panic disorder and major depression) an SSRI escitalopram (Cipralex) will be administrated for 12 weeks in flexible dose ranging between 10 - 20 mg/per day. At the end of week 12 the patients will defined as responders if the decrease in MADRS scores is at least 50% and score on the CGI improvement scale is 2 or less. The remitters will defined if the scores are less than 12 on the MADRS. Patients who do not meet these criteria will defined as non-responders and non-remitters respectively. Depressive patients, showing non-response to escitalopram monotherapy will given the combination of 20 mg of escitalopram and 150-300 mg of bupropion (Wellbutrin SR) for 6 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGescitalopram

escitalopram 10-20mg per day 12 weeks

DRUGbupropion

bupropion 150-300mg per day 6 weeks

Sponsors

University of Tartu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both genders * Diagnosis according to DSM-IV criteria * At severity of depression of at least moderate as indicated by a Montgomery-Asberg's Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of 22 or higher * Only secondary current comorbid anxiety disorder

Exclusion criteria

* Bipolar disorder * Psychotic disorder or features * Current eating disorders * Mental retardation * Any pervasive developmental disorder or cognitive disorder * Alcohol or drug abuse-related disorders within 12 months prior to baseline * Acute infections, neurological or any other unstable general disorders, serious suicide risk, formal behaviour therapy, or systematic psychotherapy, pregnancy or breastfeeding * A history of hypersensitivity or non-response to escitalopram or bupropion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery-Asberg's Depression Rating Scalethe results are for a single time point (12 weeks)Ten-item diagnostic questionnaire to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The lowest possible score on the scale is 0 and the highest possible score is 60. The lowest possible score on the scale represents the lack of any depressive symptoms and the highest score represents the severe depressive symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Rating Scale for DepressionThe outcome was measured at the week 1217-item diagnostic questionnaire to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The lowest possible score on the scale is 0 and the highest possible score is 52. The lowest possible score on the scale represents the lack of any depressive symptoms and the highest score represents the severe depressive symptoms.

Countries

Estonia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Department of Psychiatry

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Escitalopram
Escitalopram 10-20mg; an open-label, placebo not controlled trial in a naturalistic setting
135
Total135

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEscitalopram
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
135 Participants
Age, Continuous31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
135 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 135
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 135
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 135

Outcome results

Primary

Montgomery-Asberg's Depression Rating Scale

Ten-item diagnostic questionnaire to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The lowest possible score on the scale is 0 and the highest possible score is 60. The lowest possible score on the scale represents the lack of any depressive symptoms and the highest score represents the severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: the results are for a single time point (12 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscitalopramMontgomery-Asberg's Depression Rating Scale9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

17-item diagnostic questionnaire to measure the severity of depressive symptoms. The lowest possible score on the scale is 0 and the highest possible score is 52. The lowest possible score on the scale represents the lack of any depressive symptoms and the highest score represents the severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: The outcome was measured at the week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EscitalopramHamilton Rating Scale for Depression7.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026