Skip to content

Multiple Dose Safety and Efficacy of LKA651 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

A Randomized, Active-controlled, Patient and Investigator-masked, Multiple Dose Proof-of-concept Study of Intravitreal LKA651 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03927690
Enrollment
91
Registered
2019-04-25
Start date
2019-05-24
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2024-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Keywords

Macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), vision loss, macula damage, retina damage, dry macular degeneration, wet macular degeneration, AMD, diabetic macular edema, DME, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, nAMD, retinal vein occlusion, RVO, Diabetic Macular edema (DME), macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, LKA651, Lucentis

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LKA651 in patients with macular edema from diabetic macular edema (DME),

Detailed description

This study was a 3-arm, parallel group, randomized, patient- and investigator-masked trial planned in 90 patients with Diabetic macular edema (DME). The study consisted of a screening period of 60 days, main study (12 weeks), and an extension period (12 weeks). The study was stratified such that sentinel safety cohorts were first enrolled to test the safety of the combination of LKA651 and Lucentis before proceeding with further patient randomization. After determination of safety from Day 15 data from each sentinel cohort, patients were enrolled into 1 of 3 arms: LKA651 monotherapy, LKA651 plus Lucentis, and Lucentis monotherapy. Every patient was dosed 3 times in 4 week intervals in the treatment phase and was then followed up for an extension phase of an additional 12 weeks during which Lucentis was allowed to be administered as rescue at the discretion of the Investigator. No predefined rescue criteria were outlined as guidance.

Interventions

DRUGLucentis

Lucentis 0.3 mg (U.S. sites) or 0.5 mg (ex U.S. sites) Intravitreal injection, every 4 weeks for 12 weeks in the treatment phase

DRUGLKA651

LKA651 5 mg Intravitreal injection, every 4 weeks for 12 weeks in the treatment phase

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed. * Male and female patients age 18 to 85 years of age inclusive at screening * Presence of type I or type II diabetes mellitus * The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score in the study eye must be between 24 and 70 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40-20/320). The non-study eye (fellow eye) should be ≥34 letters or better (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/200) at screening * Presence of Diabetic macular edema (DME) in the study eye, with decrease in vision due to foveal thickening of central macular thickness ≥ 320 µm in the central subfield, as assessed on Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and confirmed by the central reading center at screening * Sufficiently clear ocular media and adequate pupil dilation in the study eye to permit fundus photographs of adequate clarity to measure diameters of retinal arteries and veins at screening

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with history of intravitreal (IVT) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in the study eye \<90 days from baseline * Patient with history of intraocular corticosteroids including dexamethasone intravitreal implants during the 6 month period prior to baseline. Any prior use of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (Iluvien) is prohibited regardless of timing * Laser photocoagulation (macular or panretinal) in the study eye during the 3-month period prior to baseline. * High risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy * Patients, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who have a hemoglobin A1C ≥ 12% at screening. * Any progressive disease of the retina in the study eye (e.g. uveitis,rod-cone dystrophy) or optic nerve * Area of macular retinal ischemia (as measured by the foveal avascular zone) ≥ 1000 μm. * Active intraocular inflammation (graded as trace or above) or active intraocular infection in either eye. * Current diagnosis of or laboratory evidence for anemia, defined as a hemoglobin \<10 g/dL for women and \<11 g/dL for men.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDays 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, 85Central subfield thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Central subfield retinal thickness was analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures. The model included treatment, visit, and the treatment by visit interaction as independent variables. An unstructured residual covariance structure was used. Log-transformed baseline central subfield retinal thickness and treatment naïve and treatment experienced variable were used as covariates. Results were back-transformed to show results as a ratio to baseline.
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDays 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, and 85BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. BCVA in study eye was analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures. The model included treatment, visit, and the treatment by visit interaction as independent variables. An unstructured residual covariance structure was used. Baseline BCVA value and treatment naïve and treatment experienced variable were used as covariates. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.
Inner Macular Thickness (Inferior)Week 12 (Day 85)Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
Inner Macular Thickness (Temporal)Week 12 (Day 85)Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
Outer Macular Thickness (Inferior)Week 12 (Day 85)Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
Outer Macular Thickness (Temporal)Week 12 (Day 85)Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
Number of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDays 29, 57, 85, End of Study (Up to Day 140)Foveal avascular zone was assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA).
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 12 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 24 weeks (approximately 168 days).An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation patient. The severity of the AEs (mild, moderate, severe) was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Number of participants in each category is reported in the table. A participant who falls multiple times in one category is counted only once.
Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeAdverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 12 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 24 weeks (approximately 168 days).An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation patient.
Number of Participants With Non-ocular Adverse Events (>=2%)Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 12 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 24 weeks (approximately 168 days).An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation patient.
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study EyeScreening, and Day 85Intraocular pressure was measured per the study site's regular practice.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Retreatment in Study Eye With Anti-VEGF After Week 12Week 12 (Day 85) up to Day 140Time to retreatment with anti VEGF (as determined by the investigator) after Week 12 during the additional 12 week extension phase (that was up to 16 weeks after the last dose) was examined with a Kaplan Meier plot.
Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 1 (0, 0.5 and 4 hrs post dose), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 (0, 0.5 and 4 hrs post dose), Day 43, Day 57 (0, 0.5 and 4 hrs post dose), Day 85PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods using the most recent version of WinNonlin Phoenix (Version 8.2). Concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were treated as 1/2 LLOQ in summary statistics.
Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - AUC0-28d of LKA651 (Serum)Day 1 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 43, Day 57 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 85Area under the curve over the dosing interval 0 to 28 days.
Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LucentisDay 1 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 43, Day 57 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 85
Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - AUC0-28d of Lucentis (Serum)Day 1 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 43, Day 57 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 85Area under the curve over the dosing interval 0 to 28 days.
Number of Participants Who Needed Retreatment With Anti-VEGF in Study Eye After Week 12Week 12 (Day 85) up to Day 140

Countries

Germany, Puerto Rico, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study population consisted of male and female patients with DME, who were 18 to 85 years of age at screening, and who were either treatment naive or experienced i.e. had been treated with anti VEGF therapy \> 90 days before baseline.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LKA651
LKA651 5 mg Intravitreal injection, every 4 weeks for a total of 3 doses in the treatment phase
28
LKA651 + Lucentis
LKA651 1 mg + Lucentis 0.3 mg (U.S. sites) or 0.5 mg (ex U.S. sites) Intravitreal injection, every 4 weeks for a total of 3 doses in the treatment phase
30
Lucentis
Lucentis 0.3 mg (U.S. sites) or 0.5 mg (ex U.S. sites) Intravitreal injection, every 4 weeks for a total of 3 doses in the treatment phase
33
Total91

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event100
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up221
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject311

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLKA651 + LucentisLucentisTotalLKA651
Age, Continuous63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.18
61.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
61.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants32 Participants82 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants10 Participants32 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants23 Participants59 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 280 / 300 / 331 / 91
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2816 / 3019 / 3355 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 284 / 301 / 338 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study Eye

BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. BCVA in study eye was analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures. The model included treatment, visit, and the treatment by visit interaction as independent variables. An unstructured residual covariance structure was used. Baseline BCVA value and treatment naïve and treatment experienced variable were used as covariates. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.

Time frame: Days 2, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, and 85

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set - Participants with a valid measure and without a protocol deviation that would have an impact on the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
LKA651Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 865.2 Scores on a scale
LKA651Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 4367.8 Scores on a scale
LKA651Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 2965.5 Scores on a scale
LKA651Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 261.5 Scores on a scale
LKA651Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 8567.8 Scores on a scale
LKA651Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 5767.6 Scores on a scale
LKA651Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 1565.9 Scores on a scale
LKA651 + LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 2968.2 Scores on a scale
LKA651 + LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 264.4 Scores on a scale
LKA651 + LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 868.6 Scores on a scale
LKA651 + LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 1568.6 Scores on a scale
LKA651 + LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 4370.4 Scores on a scale
LKA651 + LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 5771.5 Scores on a scale
LKA651 + LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 8572.5 Scores on a scale
LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 4369.1 Scores on a scale
LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 866.2 Scores on a scale
LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 8570.5 Scores on a scale
LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 5770.0 Scores on a scale
LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 2968.5 Scores on a scale
LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 1568.4 Scores on a scale
LucentisBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity Charts in Study EyeDay 264.1 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Day 2p-value: 0.88790% CI: [-6.2, 1]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 2p-value: 0.43190% CI: [-2.6, 3.2]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 8p-value: 0.64790% CI: [-5.4, 3.4]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 8p-value: 0.1390% CI: [-1.1, 6]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 15p-value: 0.81890% CI: [-6.9, 2]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 15p-value: 0.45790% CI: [-3.6, 4.1]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 29p-value: 0.90690% CI: [-6.9, 0.8]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 29p-value: 0.56690% CI: [-4.1, 3.3]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 43p-value: 0.68690% CI: [-5.6, 3.1]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 43p-value: 0.2890% CI: [-2.5, 5.2]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 57p-value: 0.84990% CI: [-6.3, 1.4]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 57p-value: 0.25490% CI: [-2.2, 5.2]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 85p-value: 0.86690% CI: [-6.6, 1.3]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 85p-value: 0.19890% CI: [-1.9, 5.8]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Primary

Inner Macular Thickness (Inferior)

Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Time frame: Week 12 (Day 85)

Population: Safety analysis set - Participants in the safety analysis set with a valid measurement for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LKA651Inner Macular Thickness (Inferior)503.06 micrometerStandard Deviation 137.235
LKA651 + LucentisInner Macular Thickness (Inferior)400.82 micrometerStandard Deviation 53.18
LucentisInner Macular Thickness (Inferior)390.48 micrometerStandard Deviation 48.097
Primary

Inner Macular Thickness (Temporal)

Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Time frame: Week 12 (Day 85)

Population: Safety analysis set - Participants in the safety analysis set with a valid measurement for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LKA651Inner Macular Thickness (Temporal)505.27 micrometerStandard Deviation 141.41
LKA651 + LucentisInner Macular Thickness (Temporal)414.64 micrometerStandard Deviation 67.032
LucentisInner Macular Thickness (Temporal)404.93 micrometerStandard Deviation 56.099
Primary

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study Eye

Intraocular pressure was measured per the study site's regular practice.

Time frame: Screening, and Day 85

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LKA651Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study EyeScreening15.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.2
LKA651Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study EyeDay 8515.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.56
LKA651 + LucentisIntraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study EyeScreening14.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.44
LKA651 + LucentisIntraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study EyeDay 8515.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.67
LucentisIntraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study EyeScreening15.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.88
LucentisIntraocular Pressure (IOP) in Study EyeDay 8515.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.79
Primary

Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study Eye

Central subfield thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Central subfield retinal thickness was analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures. The model included treatment, visit, and the treatment by visit interaction as independent variables. An unstructured residual covariance structure was used. Log-transformed baseline central subfield retinal thickness and treatment naïve and treatment experienced variable were used as covariates. Results were back-transformed to show results as a ratio to baseline.

Time frame: Days 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, 85

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set - Participants with a valid measure and without a protocol deviation that would have an impact on the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
LKA651Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 80.99 ratio
LKA651Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 150.97 ratio
LKA651Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 291.00 ratio
LKA651Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 431.04 ratio
LKA651Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 570.95 ratio
LKA651Mixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 850.97 ratio
LKA651 + LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 850.75 ratio
LKA651 + LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 80.83 ratio
LKA651 + LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 430.76 ratio
LKA651 + LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 570.75 ratio
LKA651 + LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 150.83 ratio
LKA651 + LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 290.80 ratio
LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 150.80 ratio
LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 290.82 ratio
LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 850.78 ratio
LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 430.79 ratio
LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 80.83 ratio
LucentisMixed Model Repeated Measures Analysis of Ratio to Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSFT) in the Study EyeDay 570.80 ratio
Comparison: Day 43p-value: 190% CI: [1.2, 1.46]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 8p-value: 0.99890% CI: [1.08, 1.33]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 8p-value: 0.52790% CI: [0.92, 1.09]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 15p-value: 0.99990% CI: [1.1, 1.33]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 15p-value: 0.71690% CI: [0.95, 1.12]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 29p-value: 190% CI: [1.13, 1.31]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 29p-value: 0.28190% CI: [0.91, 1.05]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 43p-value: 0.290% CI: [0.88, 1.04]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 57p-value: 190% CI: [1.09, 1.28]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 57p-value: 0.08390% CI: [0.87, 1.01]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 85p-value: 190% CI: [1.14, 1.38]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Comparison: Day 85p-value: 0.25490% CI: [0.88, 1.06]Mixed model repeated measures analysis
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation patient. The severity of the AEs (mild, moderate, severe) was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Number of participants in each category is reported in the table. A participant who falls multiple times in one category is counted only once.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 12 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 24 weeks (approximately 168 days).

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of severe intensity4 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsNon-serious AEs20 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious AEs3 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsStudy drug-related AEs2 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of mild intensity16 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs, Patients with AEs20 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsStudy-drug related AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of moderate intensity8 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of moderate intensity6 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs, Patients with AEs16 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of mild intensity15 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of severe intensity2 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsStudy drug-related AEs1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious AEs4 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsStudy-drug related AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNon-serious AEs16 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of moderate intensity3 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs, Patients with AEs19 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of mild intensity19 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNon-serious AEs19 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsStudy drug-related AEs2 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs of severe intensity1 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsStudy-drug related AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious AEs1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Non-ocular Adverse Events (>=2%)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation patient.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 12 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 24 weeks (approximately 168 days).

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LKA651Number of Participants With Non-ocular Adverse Events (>=2%)16 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Non-ocular Adverse Events (>=2%)15 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Non-ocular Adverse Events (>=2%)14 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study Eye

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g., any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation patient.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 12 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 24 weeks (approximately 168 days).

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeLenticular opacities0 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeOcular hypertension2 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDiabetic retinopathy1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeEyelids pruritus0 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeAbnormal sensation in eye0 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVitreoretinal traction syndrome0 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeEye pain1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeAnterior chamber flare0 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal detachment1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDacryostenosis acquired1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeCorneal erosion1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVisual acuity reduced3 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeCystoid macular oedema1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal haemorrhage1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal cyst1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVitreous haemorrhage1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDiabetic retinal oedema2 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyePatients with at least one ocular AE in study eye11 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDry eye0 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeConjunctival haemorrhage1 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyePunctate keratitis0 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeMacular oedema2 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal exudates1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyePunctate keratitis1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyePatients with at least one ocular AE in study eye7 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeConjunctival haemorrhage4 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDiabetic retinal oedema1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDiabetic retinopathy1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVisual acuity reduced0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVitreous haemorrhage0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDry eye1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeMacular oedema0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeOcular hypertension0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeAbnormal sensation in eye0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeAnterior chamber flare1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeCorneal erosion0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeCystoid macular oedema0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDacryostenosis acquired0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeEye pain0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeEyelids pruritus0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeLenticular opacities0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal cyst0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal detachment0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal exudates0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal haemorrhage0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVitreoretinal traction syndrome0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal exudates0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeEyelids pruritus1 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeMacular oedema0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeConjunctival haemorrhage2 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeLenticular opacities1 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDry eye1 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVitreous haemorrhage2 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyePunctate keratitis0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVisual acuity reduced0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeVitreoretinal traction syndrome1 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal cyst0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDiabetic retinopathy1 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal haemorrhage0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeCorneal erosion0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeRetinal detachment0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeCystoid macular oedema0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeAnterior chamber flare0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDiabetic retinal oedema2 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeDacryostenosis acquired0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeAbnormal sensation in eye1 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyePatients with at least one ocular AE in study eye9 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeEye pain0 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events by Preferred Term in Study EyeOcular hypertension0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study Eye

Foveal avascular zone was assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA).

Time frame: Days 29, 57, 85, End of Study (Up to Day 140)

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set - Participants with a valid measure and without a protocol deviation that would have an impact on the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LKA651Number of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 57 - NO CHANGE3 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 29 - NO CHANGE3 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 85 - NO CHANGE21 Participants
LKA651Number of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeEnd of Study (Up to Day 140) - NO CHANGE17 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeEnd of Study (Up to Day 140) - CANNOT GRADE1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 29 - NO CHANGE16 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 57 - NO CHANGE16 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 85 - NO CHANGE25 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeEnd of Study (Up to Day 140) - NO CHANGE22 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 29 - NO CHANGE11 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 57 - NO CHANGE7 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeEnd of Study (Up to Day 140) - NO CHANGE30 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants Without Changes in Foveal Avascular Zone as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in Study EyeDay 85 - NO CHANGE29 Participants
Primary

Outer Macular Thickness (Inferior)

Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Time frame: Week 12 (Day 85)

Population: Safety analysis set - Participants in the safety analysis set with a valid measurement for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LKA651Outer Macular Thickness (Inferior)388.66 micrometerStandard Deviation 88.128
LKA651 + LucentisOuter Macular Thickness (Inferior)349.39 micrometerStandard Deviation 44.538
LucentisOuter Macular Thickness (Inferior)342.88 micrometerStandard Deviation 50.612
Primary

Outer Macular Thickness (Temporal)

Macular thickness was measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Time frame: Week 12 (Day 85)

Population: Safety analysis set - Participants in the safety analysis set with a valid measurement for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LKA651Outer Macular Thickness (Temporal)404.60 micrometerStandard Deviation 103.616
LKA651 + LucentisOuter Macular Thickness (Temporal)371.83 micrometerStandard Deviation 70.124
LucentisOuter Macular Thickness (Temporal)352.24 micrometerStandard Deviation 56.793
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Needed Retreatment With Anti-VEGF in Study Eye After Week 12

Time frame: Week 12 (Day 85) up to Day 140

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set - Participants with a valid measure and without a protocol deviation that would have an impact on the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LKA651Number of Participants Who Needed Retreatment With Anti-VEGF in Study Eye After Week 1216 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisNumber of Participants Who Needed Retreatment With Anti-VEGF in Study Eye After Week 1216 Participants
LucentisNumber of Participants Who Needed Retreatment With Anti-VEGF in Study Eye After Week 1221 Participants
Secondary

Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - AUC0-28d of LKA651 (Serum)

Area under the curve over the dosing interval 0 to 28 days.

Time frame: Day 1 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 43, Day 57 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 85

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set. PK parameters could not be derived due to the limited number of LKA651 concentrations above the lower limit of quantification.

Secondary

Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - AUC0-28d of Lucentis (Serum)

Area under the curve over the dosing interval 0 to 28 days.

Time frame: Day 1 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 43, Day 57 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 85

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set. PK parameters could not be derived due to the limited number of Lucentis concentrations above the lower limit of quantification.

Secondary

Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651

PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods using the most recent version of WinNonlin Phoenix (Version 8.2). Concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were treated as 1/2 LLOQ in summary statistics.

Time frame: Day 1 (0, 0.5 and 4 hrs post dose), Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 (0, 0.5 and 4 hrs post dose), Day 43, Day 57 (0, 0.5 and 4 hrs post dose), Day 85

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set. Concentrations below the Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) are reported as zero.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 236.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 29.2
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 29 - 0.5 hrs post dose0.00 ng/mL
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 1 - 0 hrs0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 816.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 27.5
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 430.00 ng/mL
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 1 - 4 hrs post dose114 ng/mLStandard Deviation 211
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 57 - 0 hrs0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 157.24 ng/mLStandard Deviation 16.2
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 57 - 0.5 hrs post dos0.00 ng/mL
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 1 - 0.5 hrs post dose0.00 ng/mL
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 850.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 29 - 0 hrs0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 57 - 4 hrs post dose0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 57 - 0.5 hrs post dos0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 850.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 1 - 0 hrs0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 1 - 0.5 hrs post dose0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 1 - 4 hrs post dose4.43 ng/mLStandard Deviation 17.1
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 28.13 ng/mLStandard Deviation 21.6
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 82.08 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8.06
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 150.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 29 - 0 hrs0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 29 - 0.5 hrs post dose0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 29 - 4 hrs post dose7.60 ng/mLStandard Deviation 18.6
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 430.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
LKA651 + LucentisSummary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of LKA651Day 57 - 0 hrs0.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Summary Statistics of Pharmacokinetics - Serum Concentrations of Lucentis

Time frame: Day 1 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 43, Day 57 - 4 hrs post dose, Day 85

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set. PK parameters could not be derived due to the limited number of Lucentis concentrations above the lower limit of quantification.

Secondary

Time to Retreatment in Study Eye With Anti-VEGF After Week 12

Time to retreatment with anti VEGF (as determined by the investigator) after Week 12 during the additional 12 week extension phase (that was up to 16 weeks after the last dose) was examined with a Kaplan Meier plot.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day 85) up to Day 140

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set - Participants with a valid measure and without a protocol deviation that would have an impact on the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LKA651Time to Retreatment in Study Eye With Anti-VEGF After Week 1255.0 Days after Day 85 (Week 12)
LKA651 + LucentisTime to Retreatment in Study Eye With Anti-VEGF After Week 1234.0 Days after Day 85 (Week 12)
LucentisTime to Retreatment in Study Eye With Anti-VEGF After Week 1231.0 Days after Day 85 (Week 12)
Post Hoc

All Collected Deaths

On-treatment deaths are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 12 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 24 weeks (approximately 168 days). Post-treatment deaths are reported for the timeframe of greater than 30 days after last treatment, until study completion, up to approximately 168 days. All deaths refer to the sum of on-treatment and post-treatment deaths.

Time frame: On-treatment - up to 12 weeks; Post-treatment - greater than 30 days after last treatment, until study completion, up to approximately 168 days

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LKA651All Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths1 Participants
LKA651All Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
LKA651All Collected DeathsAll Deaths1 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisAll Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisAll Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
LKA651 + LucentisAll Collected DeathsAll Deaths0 Participants
LucentisAll Collected DeathsOn-Treatment Deaths0 Participants
LucentisAll Collected DeathsAll Deaths0 Participants
LucentisAll Collected DeathsPost-Treatment Deaths0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026