Adolescent, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Social Perception, Virtual Reality
Conditions
Keywords
virtual reality, perspective taking, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, functional magnetic resonance imaging, child, adolescent
Brief summary
This project will examine how virtual reality treatment that provides users with the alternate perspective of a virtual interpersonal interaction impacts psychological and neurobiological markers of social perspective taking in children with a disruptive behavior disorder. The investigators anticipate that experiencing a virtual encounter from a counterpart's point-of-view improves a child's perspective taking and alters brain function related to imagining another person's pain.
Detailed description
Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD), collectively known as disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs), involve persistent physical or verbal confrontations, antisocial behavior, and emotional outbursts. Despite a range of biological and environmental risk factors for DBD, social-cognitive impairments are a common link, and improving these deficits should be beneficial for all patients with DBD. Children and adolescents with DBD have deficits in social perspective taking that contribute significantly to these behavior problems. Perspective taking is the ability to perceive the world from another person's point of view, including making inferences about the capabilities, feelings, and expectations of others. Perspective taking requires substantial motivation and cognitive resources and can be difficult to achieve, particularly for children. A failure to understand or value another person's perspective inhibits helping behavior without clear direct benefits. Perspective taking skills are related to empathic concern, which encompasses feelings of sympathy and concern for unfortunate others, and theory of mind, the ability to accurately infer others' mental states, such as intentions. Negative attribution biases are more likely in individuals with poor theory of mind. Thus, improving children's perspective-taking skills should allow them to better understand a counterpart's thinking and intentions, increasing empathic concern, and reducing hostile attribution biases-and therefore improving the likelihood that prosocial behavior occurs. In the brain, perspective taking engages circuitry underlying empathic concern and theory of mind. In fMRI studies, imagining pain to the self or other, often in conjunction with images depicting painful scenarios, engages the brain's salience network. Dorsal ACC and bilateral anterior insula, the regions most commonly activated in response to other's pain, also show strong responses to self-perspective pain. However, in youth with DBD, there is a decreased response to other-perspective pain in dACC and anterior insula, despite no change or a heightened response to self-perspective pain. Software interventions have shown some promise to improve perspective taking. In particular, VR has exciting therapeutic potential to address perspective-taking deficits because it provides naturalistic yet controlled environments in which users can experience interactions from multiple viewpoints. VR interventions typically provide better generalization to real-world behavioral changes compared to traditional methods. VR has an advantage over traditional interventions because it provides an embodied experience that is a middle ground between therapy room settings and the real world (e.g., school, home) where problematic behaviors occur. In this investigation, the investigators will build upon a current VR design using an Oculus Quest virtual reality headset. After experiencing virtual interpersonal conflicts in a school cafeteria setting, participants will re-experience scenarios in one of two manners: an enriched perspective from the virtual counterpart's point-of-view, with internal dialogue and background information; or a control perspective, which replays the original point-of-view. During this proof-of-concept phase, the primary target is social perspective taking. The investigators will assess functional engagement of this target by quantifying (1) the ability to recognize and understand the virtual counterpart's perspective; and (2) the neural response (in pain circuitry) to pain experienced by the virtual counterpart, a common marker for perspective taking that is abnormal in DBD.
Interventions
Virtual reality system provides first-person perspective of a virtual social interaction in a school cafeteria as the subject attempts to complete a goal. A virtual counterpart interferes with this goal. In the alternate perspective condition, participants will then experience the scenario again from the counterpart's perspective, including internal thoughts of the virtual counterpart.
Virtual reality system provides first-person perspective of a virtual social interaction in a school cafeteria as the subject attempts to complete a goal. A virtual counterpart interferes with this goal. In the control perspective condition, participants will then experience the scenario again from identical perspective.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Assignment will be sealed for the experimenter until immediately prior to Visit 3 (for visit preparation, experimenter must be unblinded).
Intervention model description
This project will examine how levels of a virtual reality treatment that provides users with the alternate perspective of an interpersonal interaction impacts psychological and neurobiological markers of perspective taking. Following the initial screening visit, participants will be randomly assigned to different VR perspective conditions, stratified by sex, presence/absence of ADHD diagnosis, and ODD/CD diagnosis, via an a priori randomization chart. An equal number of youth will be randomly assigned to either the alternate perspective condition or control condition. Visits 1 and 2 will be identical for both groups. At Visit 3, the initial VR scenarios and assessments will be identical. The participant will then re-experience the VR scenarios depending on their assigned condition. Additional VR assessments and the MRI scan will be identical for both groups.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 9-12 * English-speaking * Meet DSM-5 criteria for oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), or Other Specified or Unspecified Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorder * Right-handed * Estimated full-scale IQ greater than 70
Exclusion criteria
* Bipolar disorder, any disorder involving psychosis, pervasive developmental disorders, current or past substance use disorder, or current major depressive disorder * History of neurological problems (e.g., epilepsy, traumatic brain injury) * Contraindications for MRI * Sibling who has participated in this study * Experience negative side effects during use of virtual reality (e.g., VR sickness) * In opinion of investigator, cannot complete study procedures or is inappropriate for study participation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Pre-intervention on the Virtual Reality Perspective Taking Scale | 1 Day | This scale provides a 0-100 score that indicates the degree to which participants understand the perspective of their virtual counterpart, derived from the Perspective Taking subscale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. A higher change score indicate greater improvement in perspective taking in the virtual environment. The scale will be completed twice on the same day, before and after the intervention. |
| Change From Pre-intervention on the Acknowledgement of Other Perspective Scale | 1 Day | This scale allows participants to rate the relative importance of the virtual counterpart's perspective, on a 0-100 scale, with a scenario-specific question. A higher change score indicates greater improvement in acknowledging the virtual counterpart's perspective. The scale will be completed twice on the same day, before and after the intervention. |
| Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain | The fMRI scans will be administered 0-2 weeks prior to the intervention and the day of the intervention (upon completion of the intervention). | Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will measure the blood-oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, left anterior insula, and right anterior insula while imagining pain happening to oneself or the virtual counterpart. Perspective taking and empathy are reflected by a similar BOLD response to self and other pain. This score reflects the change from baseline in the Self Pain - Other Pain contrast in each region. A lower score to Self vs. Other pain results from a stronger response to other's pain, reflecting improved perspective taking. Therefore, lower values reflect a stronger neural response to other's pain, compared to the baseline visit. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Families underwent clinical interview to establish child's psychiatric diagnoses (required disruptive behavior disorder without autism spectrum disorder or current depression for assignment to group). Participants also underwent baseline surveys, practice VR (also used to assess presence of VR sickness for exclusion criteria), and baseline MRI scan. Enrolled participants were not randomized if they did not meet inclusion criteria or discontinued participation prior to the intervention visit.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Alternate Perspective After experiencing VR scenarios, participants will experience the interactions again from the virtual counterpart's perspective within the VR system.
Virtual reality perspective taking training: Virtual reality system provides first-person perspective of a virtual social interaction in a school cafeteria as the subject attempts to complete a goal. A virtual counterpart interferes with this goal. In the alternate perspective condition, participants will then experience the scenario again from the counterpart's perspective, including internal thoughts of the virtual counterpart. | 23 |
| Control Perspective After experiencing VR scenarios, participants will experience the interactions again from the same perspective in the VR system.
Virtual reality control perspective: Virtual reality system provides first-person perspective of a virtual social interaction in a school cafeteria as the subject attempts to complete a goal. A virtual counterpart interferes with this goal. In the control perspective condition, participants will then experience the scenario again from identical perspective. | 22 |
| Total | 45 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Alternate Perspective | Control Perspective | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 23 Participants | 22 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 10.87 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 | 11.16 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03 | 11.01 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 20 Participants | 20 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 18 Participants | 16 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 23 Participants | 22 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants | 12 Participants | 27 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 24 | 0 / 24 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 24 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 24 |
Outcome results
Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will measure the blood-oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, left anterior insula, and right anterior insula while imagining pain happening to oneself or the virtual counterpart. Perspective taking and empathy are reflected by a similar BOLD response to self and other pain. This score reflects the change from baseline in the Self Pain - Other Pain contrast in each region. A lower score to Self vs. Other pain results from a stronger response to other's pain, reflecting improved perspective taking. Therefore, lower values reflect a stronger neural response to other's pain, compared to the baseline visit.
Time frame: The fMRI scans will be administered 0-2 weeks prior to the intervention and the day of the intervention (upon completion of the intervention).
Population: Children aged 9-12 with a disruptive behavior disorder
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternate Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain | Left Anterior Insula Change | 0.089 BOLD signal change (Self vs. Other Pain) | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Alternate Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain | Right Anterior Insula Change | 0.078 BOLD signal change (Self vs. Other Pain) | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Alternate Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain | Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Change | 0.10 BOLD signal change (Self vs. Other Pain) | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Control Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain | Right Anterior Insula Change | -0.128 BOLD signal change (Self vs. Other Pain) | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Control Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain | Left Anterior Insula Change | -0.070 BOLD signal change (Self vs. Other Pain) | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Control Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention in Brain Activity in Response to Self Pain vs. Other Pain | Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Change | -0.080 BOLD signal change (Self vs. Other Pain) | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
Change From Pre-intervention on the Acknowledgement of Other Perspective Scale
This scale allows participants to rate the relative importance of the virtual counterpart's perspective, on a 0-100 scale, with a scenario-specific question. A higher change score indicates greater improvement in acknowledging the virtual counterpart's perspective. The scale will be completed twice on the same day, before and after the intervention.
Time frame: 1 Day
Population: Children aged 9-12 with a disruptive behavior disorder
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternate Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention on the Acknowledgement of Other Perspective Scale | 2.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.1 |
| Control Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention on the Acknowledgement of Other Perspective Scale | -1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.5 |
Change From Pre-intervention on the Virtual Reality Perspective Taking Scale
This scale provides a 0-100 score that indicates the degree to which participants understand the perspective of their virtual counterpart, derived from the Perspective Taking subscale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. A higher change score indicate greater improvement in perspective taking in the virtual environment. The scale will be completed twice on the same day, before and after the intervention.
Time frame: 1 Day
Population: Children aged 9-12 with a disruptive behavior disorder
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternate Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention on the Virtual Reality Perspective Taking Scale | 16.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.9 |
| Control Perspective | Change From Pre-intervention on the Virtual Reality Perspective Taking Scale | -10.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.3 |