Skip to content

Ventilatory Adaptation to Concentric Versus Eccentric Exercise in Patients With Severe COPD

Ventilatory Adaptation to Concentric Versus Eccentric Exercise in Patients With Severe COPD

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03923660
Acronym
CONvEX
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-04-22
Start date
2018-09-20
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2019-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severe

Keywords

COPD, breathing pattern, exercise, concentric, eccentric

Brief summary

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) based on concentric exercise training has become an integral component in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), improving functional capacities while diminishing symptoms and improving quality of life. However, the response to concentric exercise training is heterogeneous from one COPD patient to another. The inability of some COPD patients to achieve the exercise intensities required to stress limb muscles due to severe ventilatory limitation could partially explain their poor response to training. Endurance exercise with eccentric muscle contractions could be an interesting alternative to concentric exercise because it produces greater muscle force through its lower metabolic cost. Eccentric exercise could allow patients with severe airflow limitation to perform prolonged exercise sessions with sufficient intensity to improve muscle function. Nevertheless, a recent study performed in healthy young subjects reported that eccentric exercise induced a more hyperpneic breathing pattern (i.e., lower tidal volume and higher breathing frequency) that concentric for a given minute ventilation. The main objective of CONvEX study is to compare ventilatory adaptation between two modalities of exercise performed on cycle ergometer (concentric versus eccentric) in severe COPD patients.

Detailed description

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) based on concentric exercise training has become an integral component in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), improving functional capacities while diminishing symptoms and improving quality of life. However, the response to concentric exercise training is heterogeneous from one COPD patient to another. The inability of some COPD patients to achieve the exercise intensities required to stress limb muscles due to severe ventilatory limitation could partially explain their poor response to training. Endurance exercise with eccentric muscle contractions could be an interesting alternative to concentric exercise because it produces greater muscle force through its lower metabolic cost. Eccentric exercise could allow patients with severe airflow limitation to perform prolonged exercise sessions with sufficient intensity to improve muscle function. Nevertheless, a recent study performed in healthy young subjects reported that eccentric exercise induced a more hyperpneic breathing pattern (i.e., lower tidal volume and higher breathing frequency) that concentric for a given minute ventilation. The main objective of CONvEX study is to compare ventilatory adaptation between two modalities of exercise performed on cycle ergometer (concentric versus eccentric) in severe COPD patients.

Interventions

OTHERIncremental Concentric-eccentric exercise test

Patients will perform incremental exercise test on semi recumbent eccentric ergometer

OTHERIncremental Eccentric-concentric exercise test

Patients will perform incremental exercise test on semi recumbent concentric ergometer

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe COPD (FEV1 \[forced expiratory volume in 1 second\] / FVC \[forced vital capacity\] \< 70% et FEV1 \< 50%) * Informed consent * Affiliation to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Effort oxygen therapy * Cardiovascular, neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders that can provide significant dyspnea or limit exercise * Legal incapacity * Low or no cooperation anticipated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilatory adaptationweek 1Breathing frequency/tidal volume ratio at the maximum common minute ventilation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic hyperinflationweek 1Dynamic hyperinflation will be assessed through iterative inspiratory capacity (IC) measurment during exercise. A decrease in IC \>150 mL compared to resting levels at any time point during exercise will be considered as dynamic hyperinflation.
Brachial muscle enrollmentweek 12.4 GHz electromyographic activity of biceps brachii recorded using surface electrod (Cometa Wave Plus wireless EMG)
Quadriceps muscle enrollmentweek 12.4 GHz electromyographic activity of vastus lateralis recorded using surface electrod (Cometa Wave Plus wireless EMG)
Ventilatory efficiencyweek 1Dead volume/Tidal volume ratio
Toleranceweek 1Borg modified scale \[ranging from 0 to 10\] for dyspnoea 0 indicates no dyspnoea and 10 the maximum dyspnoea

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026